Financial Derivatives, Hedge Accounting and Tax Aggressiveness in Brazil

Tax eJournal Pub Date : 2019-06-19 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3406683
Antonio Martinez, José Enrique Teixeira Reinoso, R. Antônio, Rogiene Batista dos Santos
{"title":"Financial Derivatives, Hedge Accounting and Tax Aggressiveness in Brazil","authors":"Antonio Martinez, José Enrique Teixeira Reinoso, R. Antônio, Rogiene Batista dos Santos","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3406683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigated the relationship between the use of financial derivatives by non-financial corporations and tax aggressiveness in Brazil. In research on the American market, evidence was identified that non-financial entity users of financial derivatives were more tax aggressive. However, there is no reason to assume that this behavior is replicated in the Brazilian market, since tax legislation does not offer the same economic incentives, i.e., since it imposes limits on the tax deductibility of losses with these financial instruments, except in derivatives’ well-documented and proven use as a hedge tool. To verify this point, companies were classified into users and non-users of first-generation financial derivatives, and associated this classification with tax aggression metrics. The study focus was 384 non-financial companies listed on the B3 in the period from 2005 to 2015. The results of regression analysis using a probit estimate have pointed, in a distinctly different way than the American reality, that the most tax aggressive companies tend to use fewer financial derivatives. Nevertheless, when the use of derivative instruments as a hedge was controlled, it was found that when a company adopts hedge accounting, it is more likely it will be more tax aggressive. The result is presumably explained by the Brazilian tax treatment that authorizes the deductibility of losses, regardless of earnings, when using the derivative as a hedge.","PeriodicalId":22313,"journal":{"name":"Tax eJournal","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tax eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3406683","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study investigated the relationship between the use of financial derivatives by non-financial corporations and tax aggressiveness in Brazil. In research on the American market, evidence was identified that non-financial entity users of financial derivatives were more tax aggressive. However, there is no reason to assume that this behavior is replicated in the Brazilian market, since tax legislation does not offer the same economic incentives, i.e., since it imposes limits on the tax deductibility of losses with these financial instruments, except in derivatives’ well-documented and proven use as a hedge tool. To verify this point, companies were classified into users and non-users of first-generation financial derivatives, and associated this classification with tax aggression metrics. The study focus was 384 non-financial companies listed on the B3 in the period from 2005 to 2015. The results of regression analysis using a probit estimate have pointed, in a distinctly different way than the American reality, that the most tax aggressive companies tend to use fewer financial derivatives. Nevertheless, when the use of derivative instruments as a hedge was controlled, it was found that when a company adopts hedge accounting, it is more likely it will be more tax aggressive. The result is presumably explained by the Brazilian tax treatment that authorizes the deductibility of losses, regardless of earnings, when using the derivative as a hedge.
巴西的金融衍生品、对冲会计和税收侵略性
本研究调查了巴西非金融公司使用金融衍生品与税收侵略性之间的关系。在对美国市场的研究中,有证据表明,金融衍生品的非金融实体使用者更具税收侵略性。然而,没有理由假设这种行为在巴西市场被复制,因为税收立法并没有提供相同的经济激励,也就是说,因为它对这些金融工具的损失的税收抵扣施加了限制,但衍生品作为对冲工具的充分记录和证明用途除外。为了验证这一点,将公司分为第一代金融衍生品的使用者和非使用者,并将这种分类与税收侵略指标联系起来。研究重点是2005年至2015年期间在B3指数上市的384家非金融公司。使用概率估计进行回归分析的结果表明,与美国的实际情况截然不同的是,最具税收侵略性的公司往往较少使用金融衍生品。然而,当衍生工具作为套期保值的使用受到控制时,我们发现,当一家公司采用套期会计时,它更有可能更具税收侵略性。这一结果大概可以用巴西的税收待遇来解释,巴西的税收待遇允许在使用衍生品作为对冲工具时,不论收益如何,都可以扣除损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信