Conquest of Mexico and Peru

IF 0.1 4区 历史学 Q3 HISTORY
S. Doebler, Matthew Restall
{"title":"Conquest of Mexico and Peru","authors":"S. Doebler, Matthew Restall","doi":"10.1093/obo/9780199791279-0193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The traditional, master narrative of the momentous collision of worlds in 16th-century Mexico and Peru centers on small bands of Spaniards, who quickly overwhelmed indigenous peoples in the Western Hemisphere with their superior technology and leadership. That narrative, rooted in the accounts and perspectives of the Spanish conquistadors themselves, has until very recently dominated the historiography of “the Conquest,” as it has long been known. The years since the 1970s have seen monumental shifts in how scholars approach the period of “the Conquest,” stemming from two distinct historiographic currents, which together have driven complex revisions to the master narrative of “the Conquest.” The first is New Military History (NMH), which emphasizes the study of war and society. New military historians focus on social, cultural, and gendered aspects of war, as opposed to the set-piece tactical battle histories, unit histories, and biographies of famous generals. Though still interested in battle itself, the NMH came to emphasize larger implications of war. While the NMH hardly engaged directly with the Conquests of Mexico and Peru, its development widened the pool of scholars considered “military” historians, made the study of warfare widely accepted, increased the field’s diversity, and pushed military historians to be more theoretical. As NMH blurred the lines between military, social, and cultural history, a second shift took place, known as the New Conquest History (NCH). The NCH developed primarily within colonial Latin American history. During the last quarter of the 20th century, scholarship focusing on Latin America increasingly studied indigenous peoples, African slaves and their descendants, and non-elite Spaniards, whose experiences in the Conquest period were largely ignored. The NCH gives indigenous-language sources particular attention, but also stresses newly found sources or the reinterpretation of familiar ones—be they written in Spanish or a native tongue, or a nontextual visual source—in order to reveal new protagonists and multiple perspectives on contact phenomena and Conquest moments. “The Conquest” is now seen as a protracted series of wars of invasion, resulting in slow and incomplete conquests of indigenous societies. Spanish-language literature published in Latin America is too vast to be included here. Instead we focus on English-language books and articles, which themselves will lead researchers into Spanish-language primary and secondary sources.","PeriodicalId":44755,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF MILITARY HISTORY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF MILITARY HISTORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199791279-0193","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The traditional, master narrative of the momentous collision of worlds in 16th-century Mexico and Peru centers on small bands of Spaniards, who quickly overwhelmed indigenous peoples in the Western Hemisphere with their superior technology and leadership. That narrative, rooted in the accounts and perspectives of the Spanish conquistadors themselves, has until very recently dominated the historiography of “the Conquest,” as it has long been known. The years since the 1970s have seen monumental shifts in how scholars approach the period of “the Conquest,” stemming from two distinct historiographic currents, which together have driven complex revisions to the master narrative of “the Conquest.” The first is New Military History (NMH), which emphasizes the study of war and society. New military historians focus on social, cultural, and gendered aspects of war, as opposed to the set-piece tactical battle histories, unit histories, and biographies of famous generals. Though still interested in battle itself, the NMH came to emphasize larger implications of war. While the NMH hardly engaged directly with the Conquests of Mexico and Peru, its development widened the pool of scholars considered “military” historians, made the study of warfare widely accepted, increased the field’s diversity, and pushed military historians to be more theoretical. As NMH blurred the lines between military, social, and cultural history, a second shift took place, known as the New Conquest History (NCH). The NCH developed primarily within colonial Latin American history. During the last quarter of the 20th century, scholarship focusing on Latin America increasingly studied indigenous peoples, African slaves and their descendants, and non-elite Spaniards, whose experiences in the Conquest period were largely ignored. The NCH gives indigenous-language sources particular attention, but also stresses newly found sources or the reinterpretation of familiar ones—be they written in Spanish or a native tongue, or a nontextual visual source—in order to reveal new protagonists and multiple perspectives on contact phenomena and Conquest moments. “The Conquest” is now seen as a protracted series of wars of invasion, resulting in slow and incomplete conquests of indigenous societies. Spanish-language literature published in Latin America is too vast to be included here. Instead we focus on English-language books and articles, which themselves will lead researchers into Spanish-language primary and secondary sources.
征服墨西哥和秘鲁
关于16世纪墨西哥和秘鲁发生的重大世界碰撞,传统的主流叙事集中在一小群西班牙人身上,他们以优越的技术和领导能力迅速压倒了西半球的土著民族。这种根植于西班牙征服者自己的叙述和观点的叙述,直到最近才主导了“征服”的历史编纂,因为它早已为人所知。自20世纪70年代以来,学者们在研究“征服”时期的方式上发生了巨大的变化,这源于两种截然不同的史学潮流,它们共同推动了对“征服”主要叙事的复杂修订。第一个是新军事史(NMH),它强调对战争和社会的研究。新的军事史学家关注战争的社会、文化和性别方面,而不是固定的战术战史、部队历史和著名将军的传记。虽然仍然对战争本身感兴趣,但新民族主义开始强调战争的更大含义。虽然NMH几乎没有直接参与墨西哥和秘鲁的征服,但它的发展扩大了被认为是“军事”历史学家的学者群体,使战争研究得到广泛接受,增加了该领域的多样性,并推动军事历史学家更加理论化。随着NMH模糊了军事、社会和文化历史之间的界限,第二次转变发生了,被称为新征服史(NCH)。NCH主要是在拉丁美洲殖民历史中发展起来的。在20世纪的最后25年里,关注拉丁美洲的学者越来越多地研究土著人民、非洲奴隶及其后裔,以及非精英西班牙人,他们在征服时期的经历在很大程度上被忽视了。NCH特别关注土著语言来源,但也强调新发现的来源或对熟悉的来源的重新解释-无论是用西班牙语还是母语写的,还是非文本的视觉来源-为了揭示新的主角和接触现象和征服时刻的多重视角。“征服”现在被视为一系列旷日持久的侵略战争,导致对土著社会缓慢而不完整的征服。在拉丁美洲出版的西班牙语文学作品太多,不能包括在这里。相反,我们专注于英语书籍和文章,这些书籍和文章本身将引导研究人员进入西班牙语的主要和次要来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信