Understanding categories of postpartum care use among privately insured patients in the United States: a cluster-analytic approach.

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 Q4 SOCIAL ISSUES
Revija Za Socijalnu Politiku Pub Date : 2023-06-20 eCollection Date: 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1093/haschl/qxad020
Julia D Interrante, Caitlin Carroll, Katy B Kozhimannil
{"title":"Understanding categories of postpartum care use among privately insured patients in the United States: a cluster-analytic approach.","authors":"Julia D Interrante, Caitlin Carroll, Katy B Kozhimannil","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxad020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The postpartum period is critical for the health and well-being of birthing people, yet little is known about the range of health care services and supports needed during this time. Maternity care patients are often targeted for clinical interventions based on \"low risk\" or \"high risk\" designations, but dichotomized measures can be imprecise and may not reflect meaningful groups for understanding needed postpartum care. Using claims data from privately insured patients with childbirths between 2016 and 2018, this study identifies categories and predictors of postpartum care utilization, including the use of maternal care and other, nonmaternal, care (eg, respiratory, digestive). We then compare identified utilization-based categories with typical high- and low-risk designations. Among 269 992 patients, 5 categories were identified: (1) low use (55% of births); (2) moderate maternal care use, low other care use (25%); (3) moderate maternal, high other (8%); (4) high maternal, moderate other (7%); and (5) high maternal, high other (5%). Utilization-based categories were better at differentiating postpartum care use and were more consistent across patient profiles, compared with high- and low-risk dichotomies. Identifying categories of postpartum care need beyond a simple risk dichotomy is warranted and can assist in maternal health services research, policymaking, and clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":53979,"journal":{"name":"Revija Za Socijalnu Politiku","volume":"1 1","pages":"qxad020"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11103737/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revija Za Socijalnu Politiku","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxad020","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The postpartum period is critical for the health and well-being of birthing people, yet little is known about the range of health care services and supports needed during this time. Maternity care patients are often targeted for clinical interventions based on "low risk" or "high risk" designations, but dichotomized measures can be imprecise and may not reflect meaningful groups for understanding needed postpartum care. Using claims data from privately insured patients with childbirths between 2016 and 2018, this study identifies categories and predictors of postpartum care utilization, including the use of maternal care and other, nonmaternal, care (eg, respiratory, digestive). We then compare identified utilization-based categories with typical high- and low-risk designations. Among 269 992 patients, 5 categories were identified: (1) low use (55% of births); (2) moderate maternal care use, low other care use (25%); (3) moderate maternal, high other (8%); (4) high maternal, moderate other (7%); and (5) high maternal, high other (5%). Utilization-based categories were better at differentiating postpartum care use and were more consistent across patient profiles, compared with high- and low-risk dichotomies. Identifying categories of postpartum care need beyond a simple risk dichotomy is warranted and can assist in maternal health services research, policymaking, and clinical practice.

了解美国私人投保患者使用产后护理的类别:一种聚类分析方法。
产后时期对分娩者的健康和福祉至关重要,但人们对这一时期所需的一系列医疗保健服务和支持却知之甚少。孕产妇护理患者通常是根据 "低风险 "或 "高风险 "的指定来确定临床干预的目标,但二分法的衡量标准可能并不精确,而且可能无法反映出有意义的群体,从而无法了解所需的产后护理。本研究利用 2016 年至 2018 年期间私人投保的分娩患者的理赔数据,确定了产后护理利用的类别和预测因素,包括产妇护理和其他非产妇护理(如呼吸道、消化道)的使用。然后,我们将确定的基于使用情况的类别与典型的高风险和低风险指定进行比较。在 269 992 名患者中,确定了 5 个类别:(1)使用率低(占出生率的 55%);(2)产妇护理使用率中等,其他护理使用率低(25%);(3)产妇护理使用率中等,其他护理使用率高(8%);(4)产妇护理使用率高,其他护理使用率中等(7%);以及(5)产妇护理使用率高,其他护理使用率高(5%)。与高风险和低风险的二分法相比,基于使用情况的分类更能区分产后护理的使用情况,而且在不同患者的情况中更为一致。除了简单的风险二分法之外,还需要确定产后护理需求的类别,这有助于孕产妇健康服务研究、政策制定和临床实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
33 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信