Uncertainty: qualitative and quantitative aspects

E. Kolesnikov
{"title":"Uncertainty: qualitative and quantitative aspects","authors":"E. Kolesnikov","doi":"10.26896/1028-6861-2023-89-7-78-86","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The analysis the concept of uncertainty, its origin, interpretation in various scientific fields, sources of uncertainty, qualitative and quantitative aspects of this concept, as well as approaches to quantifying uncertainty are presented. Methods of historical and comparative analysis were used in the study. The main conclusion is the necessity of taking into account the presence of uncertainty and quantification of uncertainty of the results of mathematical modeling of objects and phenomena of the surrounding world in the same way as we do when assessing measurement uncertainty of experimental data. In is shown that the interval approach to estimating uncertainty of modeling results currently seems to be the most promising. The concept of uncertainty first proposed at the beginning of the last century refers to epistemic situations involving imperfect or unknown information. This concept had only a qualitative aspect for a long time. In the second half of the twentieth century, almost simultaneously with the development of a risk-based approach in the field of technological security, there was an interest in understanding uncertainty, its origin and typification. We are indebted to metrology for giving uncertainty a quantitative aspect, in which, instead of the measurement error paradigm, a measurement uncertainty paradigm was developed, and approaches (partly controversial) to its quantitative assessment were proposed. Uncertainty is an attribute of any data obtained both experimentally or theoretically (currently, usually by mathematical modeling). In the field of experimental research, specifying the uncertainty interval of the result has long been a scientific standard and routine. The time has come to make it mandatory for the results of theoretical research. To date, three alternative methods of quantitative estimation of uncertainty have been developed: probabilistic, fuzzy and interval methods. Methods for leveling the negative features of its initial «naive» version have been proposed in modern interval analysis. It seems to be the most promising method of quantifying uncertainty of the results of mathematical modeling today.","PeriodicalId":13559,"journal":{"name":"Industrial laboratory. Diagnostics of materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial laboratory. Diagnostics of materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26896/1028-6861-2023-89-7-78-86","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The analysis the concept of uncertainty, its origin, interpretation in various scientific fields, sources of uncertainty, qualitative and quantitative aspects of this concept, as well as approaches to quantifying uncertainty are presented. Methods of historical and comparative analysis were used in the study. The main conclusion is the necessity of taking into account the presence of uncertainty and quantification of uncertainty of the results of mathematical modeling of objects and phenomena of the surrounding world in the same way as we do when assessing measurement uncertainty of experimental data. In is shown that the interval approach to estimating uncertainty of modeling results currently seems to be the most promising. The concept of uncertainty first proposed at the beginning of the last century refers to epistemic situations involving imperfect or unknown information. This concept had only a qualitative aspect for a long time. In the second half of the twentieth century, almost simultaneously with the development of a risk-based approach in the field of technological security, there was an interest in understanding uncertainty, its origin and typification. We are indebted to metrology for giving uncertainty a quantitative aspect, in which, instead of the measurement error paradigm, a measurement uncertainty paradigm was developed, and approaches (partly controversial) to its quantitative assessment were proposed. Uncertainty is an attribute of any data obtained both experimentally or theoretically (currently, usually by mathematical modeling). In the field of experimental research, specifying the uncertainty interval of the result has long been a scientific standard and routine. The time has come to make it mandatory for the results of theoretical research. To date, three alternative methods of quantitative estimation of uncertainty have been developed: probabilistic, fuzzy and interval methods. Methods for leveling the negative features of its initial «naive» version have been proposed in modern interval analysis. It seems to be the most promising method of quantifying uncertainty of the results of mathematical modeling today.
不确定性:定性和定量方面
本文分析了不确定性的概念,它的起源,在各个科学领域的解释,不确定性的来源,这个概念的定性和定量方面,以及量化不确定性的方法。采用历史分析和比较分析相结合的方法进行研究。主要结论是,必须像评估实验数据的测量不确定度一样,考虑物体和周围世界现象的数学建模结果的不确定度的存在和不确定度的量化。研究表明,区间法估计建模结果的不确定性是目前最有前途的方法。不确定性的概念在上世纪初首次提出,指的是涉及不完善或未知信息的认知情况。在很长一段时间里,这个概念只有一个定性的方面。在二十世纪下半叶,几乎与技术安全领域中基于风险的方法的发展同时,人们对了解不确定性、其起源和类型产生了兴趣。我们感谢计量学为不确定度提供了一个定量的方面,其中,测量不确定度范式取代了测量误差范式,并提出了定量评估的方法(部分有争议)。不确定性是实验或理论(目前通常通过数学建模)获得的任何数据的属性。在实验研究领域,确定实验结果的不确定区间早已成为一种科学标准和惯例。现在是强制要求理论研究结果的时候了。到目前为止,已经发展了三种定量估计不确定性的方法:概率法、模糊法和区间法。在现代区间分析中,提出了对其初始“朴素”版本的负特征进行调平的方法。这似乎是最具前景的量化数学建模结果不确定性的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信