Efficiency and quality of soil sampling according to a sampling tool

J. V. M. Nicoletti, Marcello R. A. Franchi, A. V. A. Motomiya, Wagner R. Motomiya, J. Molin
{"title":"Efficiency and quality of soil sampling according to a sampling tool","authors":"J. V. M. Nicoletti, Marcello R. A. Franchi, A. V. A. Motomiya, Wagner R. Motomiya, J. Molin","doi":"10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v27n6p480-486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Soil sampling is a fundamental stage for recommending agricultural correctives and fertilizers, estimating the nutritional demands of plants, and consequently maximizing productivity. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the performance of three soil samplers in different management systems in terms of sample quality and operational efficiency. A completely randomized experimental design was used in a factorial scheme. Three samplers and two sampling depths (3 × 2) were used with four replicates. At each sampling location, eight single samples were taken at a varying sampling depth of 0.0-0.2 and 0.2-0.4 m, and the collection time was recorded. Samples were analyzed for chemical attributes and granulometry. Statistically significant differences were observed for specific attributes (organic matter, K, Ca, CEC, pH, and S). In terms of operational efficiency, the hydraulic sampler was more efficient than the other samplers, being three times faster than the combustion drill and six times faster than the manual probe. Thus, it is suitable and reliable for soil sampling purposes.","PeriodicalId":21302,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v27n6p480-486","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Soil sampling is a fundamental stage for recommending agricultural correctives and fertilizers, estimating the nutritional demands of plants, and consequently maximizing productivity. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the performance of three soil samplers in different management systems in terms of sample quality and operational efficiency. A completely randomized experimental design was used in a factorial scheme. Three samplers and two sampling depths (3 × 2) were used with four replicates. At each sampling location, eight single samples were taken at a varying sampling depth of 0.0-0.2 and 0.2-0.4 m, and the collection time was recorded. Samples were analyzed for chemical attributes and granulometry. Statistically significant differences were observed for specific attributes (organic matter, K, Ca, CEC, pH, and S). In terms of operational efficiency, the hydraulic sampler was more efficient than the other samplers, being three times faster than the combustion drill and six times faster than the manual probe. Thus, it is suitable and reliable for soil sampling purposes.
根据采样工具进行土壤采样的效率和质量
土壤取样是推荐农业改良剂和肥料,估计植物营养需求,从而最大限度地提高生产力的基本阶段。因此,本研究旨在评估不同管理制度下三种土壤采样器在样品质量和操作效率方面的表现。在析因方案中采用完全随机试验设计。3个采样器,2个采样深度(3 × 2), 4个重复。在每个采样点,分别在0.0-0.2和0.2-0.4 m的不同采样深度采集8个单样本,并记录采集时间。对样品进行化学性质和粒度分析。在特定属性(有机物、K、Ca、CEC、pH和S)上观察到统计学上的显著差异。在操作效率方面,液压取样器比其他取样器效率更高,比燃烧钻快3倍,比手动探针快6倍。因此,它适合和可靠的土壤采样目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信