Accuracy of CBCT and 3D Stereolithographic Model in Identifying the Anterior Loop of the Mental Nerve: A Study on Cadavers.

Ruben R Santana, J. Lozada, A. Kleinman, Aladdin J Al-Ardah, A. Herford, Jung-Wei Chen
{"title":"Accuracy of CBCT and 3D Stereolithographic Model in Identifying the Anterior Loop of the Mental Nerve: A Study on Cadavers.","authors":"Ruben R Santana, J. Lozada, A. Kleinman, Aladdin J Al-Ardah, A. Herford, Jung-Wei Chen","doi":"10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00130.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract AbstractThe objective of this ex vivo cadaver study was to determine the accuracy of cone beam computed tomography(CBCT) and 3D stereolithographic(STL) model in identifying and measuring the anterior loop length(ANLL) of the mental nerve. A total of 12 cadavers (24 mental nerve plexus) were used for this study. Standardized CBCT scans of each mandible were obtained both with and without radiographic contrast tracer injected into the mental nerve plexus. STL models of the two acquired CBCT images were made. ANLL were measured using CBCT, STL and anatomy. The measurements obtained from the CBCT images and STL models were then analyzed and compared with the direct anatomic measurements. Paired sample t-test was used. P values less than .05 was considered statistically significant. The mean difference between CBCT and anatomic measurement was 0.04mm and not statistically significant (p= .332) while the mean difference between STL and anatomic measurement was 0.4mm and statistically significant (p=.042). There was also a statistical significant difference between CBCT and STL (p=.048) with the mean difference of 0.35mm. Therefore, CBCT is an accurate and reliable method in determining and measuring the ANLL while the STL over or underestimated the ANLL by as much as 1.51mm and 1.83mm respectively.","PeriodicalId":77634,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of oral implantology : implantologist","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of oral implantology : implantologist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00130.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract AbstractThe objective of this ex vivo cadaver study was to determine the accuracy of cone beam computed tomography(CBCT) and 3D stereolithographic(STL) model in identifying and measuring the anterior loop length(ANLL) of the mental nerve. A total of 12 cadavers (24 mental nerve plexus) were used for this study. Standardized CBCT scans of each mandible were obtained both with and without radiographic contrast tracer injected into the mental nerve plexus. STL models of the two acquired CBCT images were made. ANLL were measured using CBCT, STL and anatomy. The measurements obtained from the CBCT images and STL models were then analyzed and compared with the direct anatomic measurements. Paired sample t-test was used. P values less than .05 was considered statistically significant. The mean difference between CBCT and anatomic measurement was 0.04mm and not statistically significant (p= .332) while the mean difference between STL and anatomic measurement was 0.4mm and statistically significant (p=.042). There was also a statistical significant difference between CBCT and STL (p=.048) with the mean difference of 0.35mm. Therefore, CBCT is an accurate and reliable method in determining and measuring the ANLL while the STL over or underestimated the ANLL by as much as 1.51mm and 1.83mm respectively.
CBCT和三维立体光刻模型识别精神神经前环的准确性:尸体研究。
摘要:本实验旨在探讨锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)和三维立体光刻(STL)模型在识别和测量心神经前环长度(ANLL)方面的准确性。本研究共使用12具尸体(24条精神神经丛)。每个下颌骨的标准化CBCT扫描在有或没有放射造影剂注入精神神经丛的情况下获得。对获取的两幅CBCT图像进行STL模型。采用CBCT、STL和解剖测量ANLL。然后将CBCT图像和STL模型的测量结果与直接解剖测量结果进行分析和比较。采用配对样本t检验。P值小于0.05被认为具有统计学意义。CBCT与解剖测量的平均差异为0.04mm,无统计学意义(p=. 332); STL与解剖测量的平均差异为0.4mm,有统计学意义(p=.042)。CBCT与STL之间的差异也有统计学意义(p= 0.048),平均差异为0.35mm。因此,CBCT是确定和测量ANLL的准确可靠的方法,而STL分别超过或低估了ANLL 1.51mm和1.83mm。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书