Prevalence of MAFLD-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma

yi hau lu
{"title":"Prevalence of MAFLD-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma","authors":"yi hau lu","doi":"10.14744/ejmo.2022.77974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We read with great interest the article by Vitale et al.,[1] who examined 6882 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in Italy to estimate the prevalence of metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD).[1] They found the prevalence of MAFLD to be increasing rapidly among such patients in Italy. They also found that patients with MAFLD-related HCC were at a lower risk of HCC-related death than patients with other HCC subtypes. We applaud the investigators for providing important insights into the prevalence of MAFLD-related HCC. However, we wish to draw attention to some points to place their findings in perspective. Vitale et al. reported that they diagnosed patients with MAFLD if they were overweight or obese, defined as a body mass index > 25 kg/m2, or had type 2 diabetes mellitus, or showed evidence of metabolic disorders.[1] This is not entirely consistent with international consensus guidelines, according to which MAFLD should be diagnosed based on the presence of fatty liver as well as one of the following: overweight/obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, or lean/normal weight with evidence of metabolic disorders.[2] In addition, Vitale et al. apparently did not assess waist circumference, insulin resistance, or levels of C-reactive protein, which should also be taken into account when diagnosing MAFLD. Even if the prevalence reported by Vitale et al. can be taken to reflect bona fide MAFLD, we are concerned about whether it can be extrapolated to the larger population of HCC patients in Italy or elsewhere. Among the 6882 patients whom Vitale et al. enrolled consecutively from January 2002 to December 2019, 17.1% had single-etiology MAFLD and 51.2% had mixed-etiology MAFLD, while 31.6% did not have MAFLD. These proportions differed significantly from the corresponding proportions of 10.9%, 30.1%, and 59.0% from another sample of Italian HCC patients[3] (p<0.001, Fig. 1a) despite the fact that the enrollment window of the second sample lay within that of the sample of Vitale et al., and some patients in both samples came from the same medical center. Vitale et al. combined the prevalences of singleand mixed-etiology MAFLD to give an overall prevalence of MAFLD-related HCC of 68.3%,[1] which is significantly higher than the 12.8%[4] or 19.8%[5] in Mainland China or 38.8% in Taiwan[6] (both p<0.001, Fig. 1a). The latter two prevalences seem more reasonable to us given recent estimates of the global prevalence of MAFLD as 39.2% in the general Yu-Xian Teng,1 Hao-Tian Liu,1 Zhu-Jian Deng,1 Jia-Yong Su,1 Yi-Hua Lu,1 Jian-Hong Zhong1,2","PeriodicalId":11831,"journal":{"name":"Eurasian Journal of Medicine and Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurasian Journal of Medicine and Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/ejmo.2022.77974","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

We read with great interest the article by Vitale et al.,[1] who examined 6882 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in Italy to estimate the prevalence of metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD).[1] They found the prevalence of MAFLD to be increasing rapidly among such patients in Italy. They also found that patients with MAFLD-related HCC were at a lower risk of HCC-related death than patients with other HCC subtypes. We applaud the investigators for providing important insights into the prevalence of MAFLD-related HCC. However, we wish to draw attention to some points to place their findings in perspective. Vitale et al. reported that they diagnosed patients with MAFLD if they were overweight or obese, defined as a body mass index > 25 kg/m2, or had type 2 diabetes mellitus, or showed evidence of metabolic disorders.[1] This is not entirely consistent with international consensus guidelines, according to which MAFLD should be diagnosed based on the presence of fatty liver as well as one of the following: overweight/obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, or lean/normal weight with evidence of metabolic disorders.[2] In addition, Vitale et al. apparently did not assess waist circumference, insulin resistance, or levels of C-reactive protein, which should also be taken into account when diagnosing MAFLD. Even if the prevalence reported by Vitale et al. can be taken to reflect bona fide MAFLD, we are concerned about whether it can be extrapolated to the larger population of HCC patients in Italy or elsewhere. Among the 6882 patients whom Vitale et al. enrolled consecutively from January 2002 to December 2019, 17.1% had single-etiology MAFLD and 51.2% had mixed-etiology MAFLD, while 31.6% did not have MAFLD. These proportions differed significantly from the corresponding proportions of 10.9%, 30.1%, and 59.0% from another sample of Italian HCC patients[3] (p<0.001, Fig. 1a) despite the fact that the enrollment window of the second sample lay within that of the sample of Vitale et al., and some patients in both samples came from the same medical center. Vitale et al. combined the prevalences of singleand mixed-etiology MAFLD to give an overall prevalence of MAFLD-related HCC of 68.3%,[1] which is significantly higher than the 12.8%[4] or 19.8%[5] in Mainland China or 38.8% in Taiwan[6] (both p<0.001, Fig. 1a). The latter two prevalences seem more reasonable to us given recent estimates of the global prevalence of MAFLD as 39.2% in the general Yu-Xian Teng,1 Hao-Tian Liu,1 Zhu-Jian Deng,1 Jia-Yong Su,1 Yi-Hua Lu,1 Jian-Hong Zhong1,2
mafld相关肝细胞癌的患病率
我们饶有兴趣地阅读了Vitale等人的文章[1],他们在意大利检查了6882例肝细胞癌(HCC)患者,以估计代谢相关脂肪性肝病(MAFLD)的患病率[1]。他们发现,在意大利的这类患者中,MAFLD的患病率正在迅速上升。他们还发现,与其他HCC亚型相比,mafld相关HCC患者发生HCC相关死亡的风险较低。我们赞赏研究人员对mafld相关HCC患病率提供的重要见解。然而,我们希望提请注意一些要点,以便正确地看待他们的调查结果。Vitale等人报道,如果患者超重或肥胖,即体重指数> 25 kg/m2,或患有2型糖尿病,或有代谢紊乱的迹象,则诊断为MAFLD。[1]这与国际共识指南并不完全一致,根据国际共识指南,MAFLD的诊断应基于脂肪肝的存在以及以下情况之一:超重/肥胖、2型糖尿病或瘦/正常体重并伴有代谢紊乱的证据。[2]此外,Vitale等人显然没有评估腰围、胰岛素抵抗或c反应蛋白水平,这些在诊断MAFLD时也应考虑在内。即使Vitale等人报告的患病率可以反映真正的mald,我们也担心它是否可以外推到意大利或其他地方更大的HCC患者群体。在Vitale等人于2002年1月至2019年12月连续入组的6882例患者中,17.1%为单一病因性MAFLD, 51.2%为混合病因性MAFLD, 31.6%为无MAFLD。这些比例与另一个意大利HCC患者样本的10.9%、30.1%和59.0%的相应比例有显著差异[3](p<0.001,图1a),尽管第二个样本的入组窗口与Vitale等人的样本相同,而且两个样本中的一些患者来自同一医疗中心。Vitale等人结合单一病因和混合病因的MAFLD患病率,得出MAFLD相关HCC的总体患病率为68.3%[1],显著高于中国大陆的12.8%[4]、19.8%[5]和台湾的38.8% [6](p均<0.001,图1a)。后两种流行对我们来说似乎更合理,因为最近估计,在一般人群中,滕育贤、刘浩天、邓祝建、苏家勇、陆义华、钟建红1,2的全球患病率为39.2%
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信