Victor O. Omondi, Geoffrey O. Bosire, J. Onyari, M. N. Getahun
{"title":"A Comparative Investigation of Volatile Organic Compounds of Cattle Rumen Metabolites using HS-SPME and PoraPak-Q Odor Trapping Methods","authors":"Victor O. Omondi, Geoffrey O. Bosire, J. Onyari, M. N. Getahun","doi":"10.1080/22297928.2022.2100276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In the rapidly increasing field of metabolomic research, fast and accurate trapping of volatile odor compounds from biological samples is critical. Here a comparative evaluation of HS-SPME and PoraPak-Q adsorbent odor trapping methods followed by GC-MS analysis were used to determine volatile compounds in cattle rumen. Compared to the PoraPak-Q adsorbent, the HS-SPME method was more effective in trapping diverse metabolites including low molecular weight and highly volatile compounds such as carbon dioxide, acetic and butyric acid. Additionally, using the HS-SPME method, shorter trapping times were achieved (30 minutes) whilst the PoraPak-Q adsorbent required longer time extending beyond 1 hour for effective volatile trapping. In the context of metabolomics analysis from biological samples, the two different methods vary in determination of chemo-diversities, qualitatively and abundance of shared odor, and time required to trap odors, which are critical in such studies. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT","PeriodicalId":7793,"journal":{"name":"Analytical Chemistry Letters","volume":"21 1","pages":"451 - 459"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical Chemistry Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/22297928.2022.2100276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Abstract In the rapidly increasing field of metabolomic research, fast and accurate trapping of volatile odor compounds from biological samples is critical. Here a comparative evaluation of HS-SPME and PoraPak-Q adsorbent odor trapping methods followed by GC-MS analysis were used to determine volatile compounds in cattle rumen. Compared to the PoraPak-Q adsorbent, the HS-SPME method was more effective in trapping diverse metabolites including low molecular weight and highly volatile compounds such as carbon dioxide, acetic and butyric acid. Additionally, using the HS-SPME method, shorter trapping times were achieved (30 minutes) whilst the PoraPak-Q adsorbent required longer time extending beyond 1 hour for effective volatile trapping. In the context of metabolomics analysis from biological samples, the two different methods vary in determination of chemo-diversities, qualitatively and abundance of shared odor, and time required to trap odors, which are critical in such studies. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT