Who’s to blame for the spread of COVID-19 in New Zealand? Applying attribution theory to understand public stigma

IF 1.2 Q3 COMMUNICATION
T. Nguyen, S. Croucher, A. Diers-Lawson, Elena Maydell
{"title":"Who’s to blame for the spread of COVID-19 in New Zealand? Applying attribution theory to understand public stigma","authors":"T. Nguyen, S. Croucher, A. Diers-Lawson, Elena Maydell","doi":"10.1080/22041451.2021.1958635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The COVID-19 pandemic has brought increased discrimination, stigma, and racism toward individuals of Asian descent. Little research has concentrated on public perceptions regarding who is to blame for the spread of the virus. This study extends integrated threat and attribution theories by examining the extent to which prejudice against Asians is related to blame attribution in New Zealand. The paper employs a mixed-method approach (n = 330). The findings suggest that to understand public stigma in ambiguous crises/events, it is significant to look beyond theoretic frameworks. Particularly, this research provides better understanding of how blame attribution has developed and linked with threats in the pandemic. First, fear of contact with COVID-19 is positively related to symbolic and realistic threats. Second, the more people believe COVID-19 is a public health risk, the more symbolic and realistic threats they have. Third, realistic threat is linked to blame attribution.","PeriodicalId":10644,"journal":{"name":"Communication Research and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2021.1958635","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

ABSTRACT The COVID-19 pandemic has brought increased discrimination, stigma, and racism toward individuals of Asian descent. Little research has concentrated on public perceptions regarding who is to blame for the spread of the virus. This study extends integrated threat and attribution theories by examining the extent to which prejudice against Asians is related to blame attribution in New Zealand. The paper employs a mixed-method approach (n = 330). The findings suggest that to understand public stigma in ambiguous crises/events, it is significant to look beyond theoretic frameworks. Particularly, this research provides better understanding of how blame attribution has developed and linked with threats in the pandemic. First, fear of contact with COVID-19 is positively related to symbolic and realistic threats. Second, the more people believe COVID-19 is a public health risk, the more symbolic and realistic threats they have. Third, realistic threat is linked to blame attribution.
谁应该为COVID-19在新西兰的传播负责?运用归因理论理解公众耻辱感
2019冠状病毒病大流行增加了对亚裔的歧视、污名和种族主义。很少有研究集中在公众对谁应该为病毒的传播负责的看法上。这项研究扩展了综合威胁和归因理论,研究了新西兰对亚洲人的偏见在多大程度上与指责归因有关。本文采用混合方法(n = 330)。研究结果表明,要理解模棱两可的危机/事件中的公众污名,重要的是要超越理论框架。特别是,这项研究更好地了解了责任归因是如何发展起来的,以及如何与大流行中的威胁联系起来的。首先,对接触COVID-19的恐惧与象征性和现实威胁呈正相关。其次,人们越认为COVID-19是一种公共卫生风险,他们面临的象征性和现实性威胁就越大。第三,现实威胁与归因有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信