{"title":"Research Notes: Toward a History of the Suburban Driveway","authors":"David Salomon","doi":"10.5749/BUILDLAND.24.2.0085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Driveways are everywhere. Like traffic signs and signals, pavement markings, telephone poles, and street lamps, they belong to a category of highly legislated and highly engineered elements found especially in the suburban domestic landscape. Like these other elements of American infra structure, driveways are ubiquitous almost to the point of invisibility. However, they do have an aesthetic presence and identity. They also have a history. In the context of single-family homes, driveways have gone from being the picturesque private paths described by Andrew Jackson Downing in the 1840s to the nondescript parking pads being built in suburbia today, with many steps taken between these two extremes. No matter the form they take, driveways simultaneously perform utilitarian and representational functions. They help establish where one can go, what one does, and how one feels. However, because driveways are designed and deployed primarily for practical reasons, their experiential and rhetorical aspects are often overlooked. What does paying closer attention to these almost invisible elements of the suburban landscape reveal? These notes focus on the formal aspects of the suburban driveway and outline the different shapes, sizes, uses, and interpretations driveways have taken on over time. The goal is not to show how one type of driveway is better than another or to argue that the aesthetic aspects of driveways preclude the functional ones. Rather, these notes draw attention to the physical qualities of the driveway as a means of beginning to understand its changing cultural significance within the vernacular cultural landscape from the mid-nineteenth century to the present. This essay focuses on the driveway’s presence in a number of well-known polemical texts, design proposals, and built projects over a 150-year time frame. While the current study documents the general changes made to the suburban driveway, it is hoped that future investigations will be able to build on some of its points by examining how local legislators, builders, and owners have adapted the driveway to meet the cultural needs of specific times and places.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5749/BUILDLAND.24.2.0085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Driveways are everywhere. Like traffic signs and signals, pavement markings, telephone poles, and street lamps, they belong to a category of highly legislated and highly engineered elements found especially in the suburban domestic landscape. Like these other elements of American infra structure, driveways are ubiquitous almost to the point of invisibility. However, they do have an aesthetic presence and identity. They also have a history. In the context of single-family homes, driveways have gone from being the picturesque private paths described by Andrew Jackson Downing in the 1840s to the nondescript parking pads being built in suburbia today, with many steps taken between these two extremes. No matter the form they take, driveways simultaneously perform utilitarian and representational functions. They help establish where one can go, what one does, and how one feels. However, because driveways are designed and deployed primarily for practical reasons, their experiential and rhetorical aspects are often overlooked. What does paying closer attention to these almost invisible elements of the suburban landscape reveal? These notes focus on the formal aspects of the suburban driveway and outline the different shapes, sizes, uses, and interpretations driveways have taken on over time. The goal is not to show how one type of driveway is better than another or to argue that the aesthetic aspects of driveways preclude the functional ones. Rather, these notes draw attention to the physical qualities of the driveway as a means of beginning to understand its changing cultural significance within the vernacular cultural landscape from the mid-nineteenth century to the present. This essay focuses on the driveway’s presence in a number of well-known polemical texts, design proposals, and built projects over a 150-year time frame. While the current study documents the general changes made to the suburban driveway, it is hoped that future investigations will be able to build on some of its points by examining how local legislators, builders, and owners have adapted the driveway to meet the cultural needs of specific times and places.
车道无处不在。像交通标志和信号、人行道标线、电线杆和路灯一样,它们属于高度立法和高度设计的元素,尤其是在郊区的家庭景观中。就像美国基础设施的其他要素一样,车道无处不在,几乎到了看不见的地步。然而,它们确实有一种审美存在和身份。他们也有一段历史。在独户住宅的背景下,车道已经从19世纪40年代安德鲁·杰克逊·唐宁(Andrew Jackson Downing)所描述的风景如画的私人小路,变成了今天在郊区建造的不起眼的停车场,在这两个极端之间采取了许多步骤。无论采用何种形式,车道都同时具有实用和表征功能。他们帮助确定一个人可以去哪里,做什么,以及如何感受。然而,由于车道的设计和部署主要是出于实际原因,它们的经验和修辞方面经常被忽视。密切关注这些郊区景观中几乎看不见的元素会揭示什么?这些笔记侧重于郊区车道的正式方面,并概述了随着时间的推移,车道的不同形状、大小、用途和解释。我们的目的并不是要证明一种车道比另一种车道好,也不是要论证车道的美学方面妨碍了其功能。更确切地说,这些笔记将注意力吸引到车道的物理特性上,作为一种开始理解它在19世纪中期到现在的本土文化景观中不断变化的文化意义的手段。这篇文章的重点是在150年的时间框架内,车道在许多著名的争论文本、设计方案和建筑项目中的存在。虽然目前的研究记录了郊区车道的总体变化,但希望未来的调查能够通过检查当地立法者,建筑商和业主如何调整车道以满足特定时间和地点的文化需求,从而能够建立在其中的一些要点上。