{"title":"Every Contact Leaves a Trace: Wharton's Critique of the Forensic Imagination in The House of Mirth","authors":"M. Marchand","doi":"10.5325/EDITWHARREVI.34.2.0167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article examines how the forensic \"scene\" was invented by a new science, which revealed that objects contain records of past activities and developed an array of technologies and protocols for harvesting these records. It also explores how Edith Wharton's 1905 novel The House of Mirth took up this forensic imagination, which is, above all else, attuned to the communicative capacity of objects. This capacity is enacted in the final chapter of the novel, where Selden's attitude toward Lily's body and his systematic survey and interrogation of the objects in her room suggest that the literary influence of forensic science was felt far beyond the genre of detective fiction. Wharton represents objects as providing more voluble, candid, and persuasive testimony than humans, even as she underscores the disturbing lessons about the elusiveness of evidence and forensic detachment that emerged from the most famous trial in the history of France. In revisiting this history, we see into the origins of our own object-oriented juridical culture, which has replaced people with physical evidence as the most reliable witnesses to an event.","PeriodicalId":40904,"journal":{"name":"Edith Wharton Review","volume":"5 1","pages":"167 - 188"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Edith Wharton Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/EDITWHARREVI.34.2.0167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AMERICAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract:This article examines how the forensic "scene" was invented by a new science, which revealed that objects contain records of past activities and developed an array of technologies and protocols for harvesting these records. It also explores how Edith Wharton's 1905 novel The House of Mirth took up this forensic imagination, which is, above all else, attuned to the communicative capacity of objects. This capacity is enacted in the final chapter of the novel, where Selden's attitude toward Lily's body and his systematic survey and interrogation of the objects in her room suggest that the literary influence of forensic science was felt far beyond the genre of detective fiction. Wharton represents objects as providing more voluble, candid, and persuasive testimony than humans, even as she underscores the disturbing lessons about the elusiveness of evidence and forensic detachment that emerged from the most famous trial in the history of France. In revisiting this history, we see into the origins of our own object-oriented juridical culture, which has replaced people with physical evidence as the most reliable witnesses to an event.
摘要:本文探讨了法医“现场”是如何被一门新科学发明的,它揭示了物体包含过去活动的记录,并开发了一系列获取这些记录的技术和协议。它还探讨了伊迪丝·沃顿(Edith Wharton) 1905年的小说《欢乐之家》(The House of欢笑)是如何运用这种法医想象力的,这种想象力最重要的是与物体的交流能力相协调。这种能力在小说的最后一章得到了体现,塞尔登对莉莉尸体的态度以及他对她房间里物品的系统调查和审讯表明,法医学的文学影响远远超出了侦探小说的范畴。沃顿认为,物品提供的证词比人类更健谈、更坦率、更有说服力,尽管她强调了法国历史上最著名的审判中出现的证据难以捉摸和法医超然的令人不安的教训。在回顾这段历史时,我们看到了我们自己的面向对象的司法文化的起源,这种文化已经用实物证据取代了人,成为事件最可靠的证人。