X-Ray Dose Audit and Potential Local Diagnostic Reference Levels in Select Hospitals In Kaduna State, Nigeria

Abeabe, Christopher Ishiekwen, A. Aliyu, Maduakonam Simon Nwafor
{"title":"X-Ray Dose Audit and Potential Local Diagnostic Reference Levels in Select Hospitals In Kaduna State, Nigeria","authors":"Abeabe, Christopher Ishiekwen, A. Aliyu, Maduakonam Simon Nwafor","doi":"10.48153/jrrs.v32i1.223075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"  \n \n \n \n \nBackground: Dosimetry in diagnostic radiology is fundamental to providing information to practitioners regarding the level of their doses and to ensure adequate optimization of the protection of patients presenting for radiological examinations. The introduction and implementation of diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) in diagnostic radiology has proven to be a potent tool for quality control and dose reduction. This has not been comprehensively addressed in Nigeria. \nObjective: To carryout dose audit of patients presenting for common radiographic projections in select hospitals in Kaduna State, Nigeria. \nMethodology: Thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) were used to measure entrance surface dose (ESD) on 420 randomly selected adult patients presenting for x-ray examination of the chest PA/Lateral, skull PA/Lateral, lumbar spine AP/Lateral, abdomen and pelvic AP, respectively. Results were compared with existing literature. \nResults: The range of the mean ESD determined for the study population on various x-ray examinations were: chest PA (0.44 – 0.9 mGy), and  lateral (0.9 – 1.5 mGy); skull PA (2.0 – 4.7 mGy), and lateral (1.7 – 3.4 mGy); lumbar spine AP (3.4 -7.8 mGy), and lateral (6.8 –11.3 mGy); abdomen AP (3.6 – 6.2 mGy); and pelvic AP (2.4 – 6.9 mGy). Comparison showed dose levels were below IAEA recommendations. \nConclusion: In the absence of arbitrary high doses, practice is generally safe and will not result in unwarranted hazards to the patients. \n \n \n \n \n ","PeriodicalId":16919,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radiography and Radiation Sciences","volume":"71 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radiography and Radiation Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48153/jrrs.v32i1.223075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

  Background: Dosimetry in diagnostic radiology is fundamental to providing information to practitioners regarding the level of their doses and to ensure adequate optimization of the protection of patients presenting for radiological examinations. The introduction and implementation of diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) in diagnostic radiology has proven to be a potent tool for quality control and dose reduction. This has not been comprehensively addressed in Nigeria. Objective: To carryout dose audit of patients presenting for common radiographic projections in select hospitals in Kaduna State, Nigeria. Methodology: Thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) were used to measure entrance surface dose (ESD) on 420 randomly selected adult patients presenting for x-ray examination of the chest PA/Lateral, skull PA/Lateral, lumbar spine AP/Lateral, abdomen and pelvic AP, respectively. Results were compared with existing literature. Results: The range of the mean ESD determined for the study population on various x-ray examinations were: chest PA (0.44 – 0.9 mGy), and  lateral (0.9 – 1.5 mGy); skull PA (2.0 – 4.7 mGy), and lateral (1.7 – 3.4 mGy); lumbar spine AP (3.4 -7.8 mGy), and lateral (6.8 –11.3 mGy); abdomen AP (3.6 – 6.2 mGy); and pelvic AP (2.4 – 6.9 mGy). Comparison showed dose levels were below IAEA recommendations. Conclusion: In the absence of arbitrary high doses, practice is generally safe and will not result in unwarranted hazards to the patients.  
尼日利亚卡杜纳州选定医院的x射线剂量审计和潜在的当地诊断参考水平
背景:放射诊断学中的剂量学是向从业人员提供有关剂量水平的信息的基础,并确保充分优化对前来放射检查的患者的保护。在诊断放射学中引入和实施诊断参考水平(DRLs)已被证明是质量控制和减少剂量的有力工具。这一问题在尼日利亚尚未得到全面解决。目的:对在尼日利亚卡杜纳州选定医院就诊的普通x线投射患者进行剂量审计。方法:采用热释光剂量计(TLDs)对随机选择的420例成人患者分别进行胸部PA/侧位、颅骨PA/侧位、腰椎AP/侧位、腹部和骨盆AP的x线检查,测量其入口表面剂量(ESD)。结果与已有文献进行比较。结果:研究人群在各种x线检查中确定的平均ESD范围为:胸部PA (0.44 - 0.9 mGy)和侧面(0.9 - 1.5 mGy);颅骨PA (2.0 - 4.7 mGy)和外侧PA (1.7 - 3.4 mGy);腰椎AP (3.4 -7.8 mGy)和侧位AP (6.8 -11.3 mGy);腹部AP (3.6 - 6.2 mGy);盆腔AP (2.4 - 6.9 mGy)。比较表明,剂量水平低于原子能机构的建议。结论:在没有任意高剂量的情况下,实践通常是安全的,不会对患者造成不必要的危害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信