Comparison of Electrons and Photons Treatment Plans in Medulloblastoma Patients

M. U. Ghani, Aasia Razzaq, N. Amjad, Ismat Fatima
{"title":"Comparison of Electrons and Photons Treatment Plans in Medulloblastoma Patients","authors":"M. U. Ghani, Aasia Razzaq, N. Amjad, Ismat Fatima","doi":"10.33371/ijoc.v17i1.949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The treatment of medulloblastoma involves surgery, radiotherapy, and adjuvant chemotherapy. In radiotherapy, craniospinal irradiation (CSI) is prescribed, where two lateral cranial fields and one or two spinal beams are applied in CSI. Different multi-field techniques (coplanar and/or noncoplanar) are used to register the prescribed dose. The purpose of this study was to assess plan quality in terms of dose coverage of the spine with both photon and electron beam therapy and the sparing of organs at risks (OARs).Methods: Ten pediatric patients (ages 6 to 10 years) were immobilized in the prone position for simulation. The Clinical Target Volume (CTV) of the organ under treatment, Planning Target volume (PTV) of the organ under treatment, and OARs were contoured. Prowess Panther (v4.71) was used for dose computations. Two lateral parallel-opposed 6 MV photon cranial fields with the spinal beam(s) (either 6 Photons or 21 MeV electrons) were used in planning. Electron beams were added posteriorly on the spine with parallel-opposed cranial fields. The treatment plans were computed for 3600 c Gy in 21 fractions.Results: For comparable conformity number of electron versus photons beam plans (0.68 ± 0.41 versus 0.66 ± 0.47, is not significantly different at p < 0.05) and homogeneity index (1.22 ± 0.03 versus 1.25 ± 0.04, is significantly different at p < 0.05), the photon doses were higher for underlying OARs (heart, liver, and thyroid) and were lower for partially in-field organs (lungs and kidneys) compared to electrons.Conclusions: The underlying organs i.e., thyroid, heart, and liver receive a lesser dose in case of electrons, while partially in-field organs are exposed more compared to photons mainly due to the ballooning effect in electrons. The study shows that both electrons and photons can be used for CSI. However, the electron may be preferred due to its better sparing of underlying structures.","PeriodicalId":13489,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of Cancer","volume":"119 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33371/ijoc.v17i1.949","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The treatment of medulloblastoma involves surgery, radiotherapy, and adjuvant chemotherapy. In radiotherapy, craniospinal irradiation (CSI) is prescribed, where two lateral cranial fields and one or two spinal beams are applied in CSI. Different multi-field techniques (coplanar and/or noncoplanar) are used to register the prescribed dose. The purpose of this study was to assess plan quality in terms of dose coverage of the spine with both photon and electron beam therapy and the sparing of organs at risks (OARs).Methods: Ten pediatric patients (ages 6 to 10 years) were immobilized in the prone position for simulation. The Clinical Target Volume (CTV) of the organ under treatment, Planning Target volume (PTV) of the organ under treatment, and OARs were contoured. Prowess Panther (v4.71) was used for dose computations. Two lateral parallel-opposed 6 MV photon cranial fields with the spinal beam(s) (either 6 Photons or 21 MeV electrons) were used in planning. Electron beams were added posteriorly on the spine with parallel-opposed cranial fields. The treatment plans were computed for 3600 c Gy in 21 fractions.Results: For comparable conformity number of electron versus photons beam plans (0.68 ± 0.41 versus 0.66 ± 0.47, is not significantly different at p < 0.05) and homogeneity index (1.22 ± 0.03 versus 1.25 ± 0.04, is significantly different at p < 0.05), the photon doses were higher for underlying OARs (heart, liver, and thyroid) and were lower for partially in-field organs (lungs and kidneys) compared to electrons.Conclusions: The underlying organs i.e., thyroid, heart, and liver receive a lesser dose in case of electrons, while partially in-field organs are exposed more compared to photons mainly due to the ballooning effect in electrons. The study shows that both electrons and photons can be used for CSI. However, the electron may be preferred due to its better sparing of underlying structures.
电子与光子治疗髓母细胞瘤的比较
背景:髓母细胞瘤的治疗包括手术、放疗和辅助化疗。在放射治疗中,规定了颅脊髓照射(CSI),其中两个侧颅野和一个或两个脊柱束在CSI中应用。使用不同的多场技术(共面和/或非共面)来登记规定剂量。本研究的目的是根据光子和电子束治疗对脊柱的剂量覆盖和对危险器官的保护来评估计划质量。方法:将10例6 ~ 10岁儿童患者固定于俯卧位进行模拟。绘制待治疗器官的临床靶体积(CTV)、待治疗器官的计划靶体积(PTV)和OARs轮廓。威力豹(v4.71)用于剂量计算。两个横向平行的6毫伏光子颅脑场与脊髓束(6光子或21 MeV电子)被用于规划。在脊柱后方以平行对置的颅脑场加电子束。计算了3600 cgy的21个分量的治疗方案。结果:电子束与光子束计划的一致性数(0.68±0.41 vs 0.66±0.47,差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05))和均匀性指数(1.22±0.03 vs 1.25±0.04,差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05),与电子相比,光子剂量对潜在的OARs(心脏、肝脏和甲状腺)较高,对部分场内器官(肺和肾脏)较低。结论:甲状腺、心脏和肝脏等底层器官在电子照射下接受的剂量较小,而部分场内器官暴露于光子较多,主要是由于电子的气球效应。研究表明,电子和光子都可以用于CSI。然而,电子可能是优选的,因为它更好地节省了底层结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信