Biofeedback as complementary treatment in patients with epilepsy – an underestimated therapeutic option? Review, results, discussion

C. Uhlmann, W. Fröscher
{"title":"Biofeedback as complementary treatment in patients with epilepsy – an underestimated therapeutic option? Review, results, discussion","authors":"C. Uhlmann, W. Fröscher","doi":"10.1515/JOEPI-2016-0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary Background Biofeedback methods represent side effect free complementary options in the treatment of epilepsy. In this paper we review the current status of these methods in terms of clinical study results and their evaluation by systematic review papers. Possible mechanisms of action in biofeedback methods are discussed. Aim To present the current status of biofeedback methods applied to patients with epilepsy. Material and Methods With a literature search up to 10/2016 we screened publications containing the search terms “biofeedback”, “neurofeedback” or “neurotherapy” and “epilepsy” or “seizure” for intervention and population search terms respectively. Results Four different techniques of biofeedback were used to improve seizure frequency in patients with epilepsy. Three of these techniques, measuring EEG (slow cortical potentials and sensory motor rhythm) or electrodermal activity (galvanic skin response, GSR) seem to be promising methods for successful seizure control. Nevertheless, methodological standards in the conducted trials were too low for assured empirical evidence in their efficacy. Conclusions Biofeedback methods could be applied to patients to a greater extent. Probably due to the missing empirical evidence of efficacy and the high demand on patients’ and therapists’ time and commitment and therefore low cost effectiveness, these methods are hardly offered. Especially the relatively new approach of GSR biofeedback represents a promising option here.","PeriodicalId":15683,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Epileptology","volume":"100 1","pages":"173 - 180"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Epileptology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/JOEPI-2016-0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Summary Background Biofeedback methods represent side effect free complementary options in the treatment of epilepsy. In this paper we review the current status of these methods in terms of clinical study results and their evaluation by systematic review papers. Possible mechanisms of action in biofeedback methods are discussed. Aim To present the current status of biofeedback methods applied to patients with epilepsy. Material and Methods With a literature search up to 10/2016 we screened publications containing the search terms “biofeedback”, “neurofeedback” or “neurotherapy” and “epilepsy” or “seizure” for intervention and population search terms respectively. Results Four different techniques of biofeedback were used to improve seizure frequency in patients with epilepsy. Three of these techniques, measuring EEG (slow cortical potentials and sensory motor rhythm) or electrodermal activity (galvanic skin response, GSR) seem to be promising methods for successful seizure control. Nevertheless, methodological standards in the conducted trials were too low for assured empirical evidence in their efficacy. Conclusions Biofeedback methods could be applied to patients to a greater extent. Probably due to the missing empirical evidence of efficacy and the high demand on patients’ and therapists’ time and commitment and therefore low cost effectiveness, these methods are hardly offered. Especially the relatively new approach of GSR biofeedback represents a promising option here.
生物反馈作为癫痫患者的补充治疗——一种被低估的治疗选择?回顾,结果,讨论
背景生物反馈方法是治疗癫痫无副作用的补充选择。本文从临床研究结果和系统评价两方面综述了这些方法的研究现状。讨论了生物反馈方法中可能的作用机制。目的介绍生物反馈方法在癫痫患者中的应用现状。材料和方法通过文献检索,我们筛选了包含“生物反馈”、“神经反馈”或“神经疗法”和“癫痫”或“癫痫发作”的出版物,分别用于干预和人群搜索词。结果采用四种不同的生物反馈技术改善癫痫患者的发作频率。其中三种技术,测量脑电图(慢皮层电位和感觉运动节律)或皮电活动(皮肤电反应,GSR)似乎是成功控制癫痫发作的有希望的方法。然而,所进行的试验的方法标准太低,无法确定其有效性的经验证据。结论生物反馈方法可在更大程度上应用于患者。可能由于缺乏疗效的经验证据,对患者和治疗师的时间和承诺的要求很高,因此成本效益低,这些方法很少提供。特别是相对较新的GSR生物反馈方法在这里代表了一个有希望的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信