S. Gibson
{"title":"Art Into science/science into art","authors":"S. Gibson","doi":"10.15173/JPC.V3I2.152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hybrid artist-scientists are now fairly common. It wasn’t always thus. Certainly music has a relatively long history of cross-fertilization with science, not least because of its obvious mathematical qualities, but also because of the medium-term relationship between music and technology. In formal music studies though, the medium of music was generally considered indivisible from itself, even as mathematical models were used to justify certain theories. Film also has a similar, if somewhat less precisely formalized history, as evidenced by the long history of montage film and visual music. Other fine arts have had less clear relationships with science. This can no longer be said to be the case. Artists are collaborating with biologists, computer scientists, geographers and researchers from other far-flung disciplines. Similarly scientists are learning the value that artists can bring to a project in terms of creativity and “ways of seeing” (Berger, 1972, 1). On-going discipline-centric resistance based on adherence to traditional barriers between the (subjective) arts and the (objective) sciences continues to be prevalent; however, it is fair to say that the gulf between art and science that has widened since the Enlightenment has now been widely challenged by a body of scholars, artists and scientists. ©Journal of Professional Communication, all rights reserved.","PeriodicalId":41240,"journal":{"name":"Fachsprache-Journal of Professional and Scientific Communication","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fachsprache-Journal of Professional and Scientific Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15173/JPC.V3I2.152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
把科学变成艺术
艺术家和科学家的混血儿现在相当普遍。事情并不总是这样。当然,音乐与科学的交叉发展有着相对悠久的历史,不仅因为其明显的数学特性,还因为音乐与技术之间的中期关系。然而,在正式的音乐研究中,音乐的媒介通常被认为是不可分割的,即使数学模型被用来证明某些理论。电影也有类似的,如果不那么精确的形式化的历史,证明了蒙太奇电影和视觉音乐的悠久历史。其他美术与科学的关系就不那么明确了。现在不能再这样说了。艺术家们正在与生物学家、计算机科学家、地理学家和来自其他遥远学科的研究人员合作。同样,科学家们也在学习艺术家在创造力和“观察方式”方面可以为项目带来的价值(Berger, 1972, 1)。基于(主观)艺术和(客观)科学之间传统壁垒的坚持,以学科为中心的抵抗仍然普遍存在;然而,公平地说,自启蒙运动以来,艺术与科学之间的鸿沟已经扩大,现在已经受到学者、艺术家和科学家的广泛挑战。©Journal of Professional Communication,版权所有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。