Comparison of Survival Outcomes between Early Breast Cancer Patients who Underwent Mastectomy and Patients Treated by Breast Conserving Therapy: A Meta Analysis

Astère Manirakiza, Laurent Irakoze, S. Manirakiza
{"title":"Comparison of Survival Outcomes between Early Breast Cancer Patients who Underwent Mastectomy and Patients Treated by Breast Conserving Therapy: A Meta Analysis","authors":"Astère Manirakiza, Laurent Irakoze, S. Manirakiza","doi":"10.24248/eahrj.v6i1.672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Early stage of breast cancer requires mastectomy or breast conserving therapy. However, there are disagreements regarding the outcome of these two types of therapies in term of overall survivals. Objectives: The first aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the overall survival between patients who underwent mastectomy and those treated by breast conserving therapy. The second was to evaluate the influence of the follow up period on overall survival between the patients who benefited mastectomy and those who under went breast conservative therapy. Methods: We systematically searched on PubMed and Cochrane library all published randomized trials comparing mastectomy with breast conserving therapy and assessing overall survival. Results: Using dichotomous data, there was not a significant difference between mastectomy and BCT (OR:0.99; 95% CI:0.93-1.06; P:0.86). This was the same in subgroup analysis based on period of follow up. Their ORs and CI were (OR:0.97; 95% CI:0.81-1.18; P:0.79), (OR:1.01; 95% CI:0.90-1.13; P:0.87) and (OR:1.04; 95% CI:0.93-1.16; P:0.46) respectively for up to 5 years or less, between 5 and 10 years and more than 10 years of follow up. Using generic inverse variance, there was no significant difference between mastectomy and BCT, (HR:1.01; 95% CI:0.98-1.04; P:0.71). In subgroup analysis based on period of follow up, there was no significant difference between mastectomy and BCT. Their HRs, CI and P-value were (HR:1.01; 95% CI:0.951-1.07; P:0.79), (HR:0.98; 95% CI:0.92-1.04; P:0.51) and (HR:1.02; 95% CI:0.97-1.07; P:0.40) respectively for up to 5 years or less, between 5 and 10 years and more than 10 years of follow up. Conclusion: This meta-analysis demonstrated that there was no significant difference between patients with early stage breast cancer when they are treated by mastectomy or breast consevative therapy in term of overall survival. Additionnally, the follow up period had no any influence on the both types of surgery in term of overall survival. Therefore, we suggest that breast conservative therapy or mastectomy should be discussed between the care team and the patient, taking into account the financial means available to the patient, especially in low-income countries, the benefits of the surgery and the patient's choices.","PeriodicalId":74991,"journal":{"name":"The East African health research journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The East African health research journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24248/eahrj.v6i1.672","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Early stage of breast cancer requires mastectomy or breast conserving therapy. However, there are disagreements regarding the outcome of these two types of therapies in term of overall survivals. Objectives: The first aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the overall survival between patients who underwent mastectomy and those treated by breast conserving therapy. The second was to evaluate the influence of the follow up period on overall survival between the patients who benefited mastectomy and those who under went breast conservative therapy. Methods: We systematically searched on PubMed and Cochrane library all published randomized trials comparing mastectomy with breast conserving therapy and assessing overall survival. Results: Using dichotomous data, there was not a significant difference between mastectomy and BCT (OR:0.99; 95% CI:0.93-1.06; P:0.86). This was the same in subgroup analysis based on period of follow up. Their ORs and CI were (OR:0.97; 95% CI:0.81-1.18; P:0.79), (OR:1.01; 95% CI:0.90-1.13; P:0.87) and (OR:1.04; 95% CI:0.93-1.16; P:0.46) respectively for up to 5 years or less, between 5 and 10 years and more than 10 years of follow up. Using generic inverse variance, there was no significant difference between mastectomy and BCT, (HR:1.01; 95% CI:0.98-1.04; P:0.71). In subgroup analysis based on period of follow up, there was no significant difference between mastectomy and BCT. Their HRs, CI and P-value were (HR:1.01; 95% CI:0.951-1.07; P:0.79), (HR:0.98; 95% CI:0.92-1.04; P:0.51) and (HR:1.02; 95% CI:0.97-1.07; P:0.40) respectively for up to 5 years or less, between 5 and 10 years and more than 10 years of follow up. Conclusion: This meta-analysis demonstrated that there was no significant difference between patients with early stage breast cancer when they are treated by mastectomy or breast consevative therapy in term of overall survival. Additionnally, the follow up period had no any influence on the both types of surgery in term of overall survival. Therefore, we suggest that breast conservative therapy or mastectomy should be discussed between the care team and the patient, taking into account the financial means available to the patient, especially in low-income countries, the benefits of the surgery and the patient's choices.
早期乳腺癌患者行乳房切除术和保乳治疗的生存结果比较:一项Meta分析
背景:早期乳腺癌需要乳房切除术或保乳治疗。然而,就总生存率而言,这两种治疗方法的结果存在分歧。目的:本荟萃分析的第一个目的是评估接受乳房切除术和保乳治疗的患者的总生存率。第二个是评估随访期对接受乳房切除术的患者和接受乳房保守治疗的患者总生存率的影响。方法:我们系统地检索PubMed和Cochrane文库中所有已发表的比较乳房切除术和保乳治疗以及评估总生存率的随机试验。结果:使用二分类数据,乳房切除术与BCT之间无显著差异(OR:0.99;95%置信区间:0.93—-1.06;P: 0.86)。在基于随访时间的亚组分析中也是如此。他们的OR和CI分别为(OR:0.97;95%置信区间:0.81—-1.18;P: 0.79),(或:1.01;95%置信区间:0.90—-1.13;P:0.87)和(OR:1.04;95%置信区间:0.93—-1.16;P:0.46)分别为5年以下、5 - 10年及10年以上随访。采用通用反方差分析,乳房切除术与BCT之间无显著差异(HR:1.01;95%置信区间:0.98—-1.04;P: 0.71)。在随访时间的亚组分析中,乳房切除术与BCT无显著性差异。其HR、CI和p值分别为(HR:1.01;95%置信区间:0.951—-1.07;P: 0.79),(人力资源:0.98;95%置信区间:0.92—-1.04;P:0.51)和(HR:1.02;95%置信区间:0.97—-1.07;P:0.40)分别为5年或以下,5至10年和10年以上的随访。结论:本荟萃分析显示,早期乳腺癌患者在接受乳房切除术或乳房保守治疗时的总生存期无显著差异。此外,随访时间对两种手术的总生存率没有任何影响。因此,我们建议应在护理团队和患者之间讨论乳房保守治疗或乳房切除术,考虑到患者可用的经济手段,特别是在低收入国家,手术的好处和患者的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信