Evaluation of Efficacy of Rapid Antigen Test against RT-PCR and its Correlation with Cycle Threshold (CT) values: an Institutional Experience

Uma Shankar Saha, Minakshi Gupta, M. Mishra, Rajan Chaudhry, S. Rai
{"title":"Evaluation of Efficacy of Rapid Antigen Test against RT-PCR and its Correlation with Cycle Threshold (CT) values: an Institutional Experience","authors":"Uma Shankar Saha, Minakshi Gupta, M. Mishra, Rajan Chaudhry, S. Rai","doi":"10.46798/ijam.2021.v23i01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rapidly increasing COVID-19 or SARS-CoV-2 in whole world caused a tremendous pressure on existing diagnostic setup to give accurate diagnosis on time by gold standard RT-PCR technique forcing scientist to think beyond RT-PCR which ultimately ended with invent of Rapid antigen test which can give about 100% specific and rapid result but may miss many case due to low sensitivity.\nSo we wanted to evaluate the Rapid antigen test against RT-PCR for its diagnostic accuracy. We followed standard procedure for sample collection, Rapid antigen test and RT-PCR test. \nIn about one and half month span we collected 554 antigen negative samples in our hospital. About 13% sample (74/554) turned out as positive by RT-PCR test. About 40 % (30/74) positive samples had low Ct value (<25) indicating higher viral load present in those patients. Above findings indicate that only antigen test will miss a significant portion of positive cases with higher viral load which may complicate the pandemic by unknowingly spreading the virus within the society. So we should try to improve our infrastructure to carry out more RTPCR test so we can detect more cases to identify and isolate them from others to prevent or slowdown the transmission chain.\n","PeriodicalId":13518,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Applied Microbiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Applied Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46798/ijam.2021.v23i01.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rapidly increasing COVID-19 or SARS-CoV-2 in whole world caused a tremendous pressure on existing diagnostic setup to give accurate diagnosis on time by gold standard RT-PCR technique forcing scientist to think beyond RT-PCR which ultimately ended with invent of Rapid antigen test which can give about 100% specific and rapid result but may miss many case due to low sensitivity. So we wanted to evaluate the Rapid antigen test against RT-PCR for its diagnostic accuracy. We followed standard procedure for sample collection, Rapid antigen test and RT-PCR test. In about one and half month span we collected 554 antigen negative samples in our hospital. About 13% sample (74/554) turned out as positive by RT-PCR test. About 40 % (30/74) positive samples had low Ct value (<25) indicating higher viral load present in those patients. Above findings indicate that only antigen test will miss a significant portion of positive cases with higher viral load which may complicate the pandemic by unknowingly spreading the virus within the society. So we should try to improve our infrastructure to carry out more RTPCR test so we can detect more cases to identify and isolate them from others to prevent or slowdown the transmission chain.
快速抗原检测对RT-PCR的疗效评价及其与周期阈值(CT)值的相关性:一个机构经验
全球快速增加的COVID-19或SARS-CoV-2给现有的诊断设置带来了巨大的压力,迫使科学家们通过金标准RT-PCR技术及时给出准确的诊断,迫使科学家们超越RT-PCR,最终发明了快速抗原测试,该测试可以给出大约100%的特异性和快速结果,但由于灵敏度低,可能会错过许多病例。因此,我们想评估快速抗原试验与RT-PCR的诊断准确性。标本采集、快速抗原检测、RT-PCR检测均按标准程序进行。在1个半月的时间里,共采集抗原阴性样本554份。约13%的样本(74/554)经RT-PCR检测呈阳性。约40%(30/74)阳性样本的Ct值较低(<25),表明这些患者存在较高的病毒载量。以上结果表明,单纯的抗原检测会遗漏相当一部分病毒载量较高的阳性病例,这可能会在不知情的情况下在社会中传播病毒,使大流行复杂化。因此,我们应该努力改善我们的基础设施,开展更多的RTPCR检测,这样我们就可以发现更多的病例,以识别和隔离他们,以防止或减缓传播链。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信