Banking and Finance after COVID-19

M. Schillig
{"title":"Banking and Finance after COVID-19","authors":"M. Schillig","doi":"10.1080/09615768.2021.1886659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 crisis has had a major impact across all sectors of the economy. For the most part, businesses and households have been affected negatively; although some, notably online retailers and streaming platforms, have significantly increased their profits. Alongside health care and the pharmaceutical industry, banking and finance will be essential for helping the real economy to get through the crisis, and for paving the way to economic recovery and a return to a more normal life. The liquidity generated by the vast stimulus and rescue programmes launched by governments and central banks around the world has to be channelled to businesses and households. To have any chance of financial survival, businesses and households in lockdown need leniency with their existing credit arrangements; new credit should flow freely. When the pressures of the pandemic eventually subside, the ensuing recovery will have to be funded largely through the money supply provided by commercial banks. To accommodate these needs, banking and finance law had to be adjusted, affecting both minute regulatory detail and broader private law principles. Overall, this process is part of a remarkable transformation: the villain of the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) has become one of the saviours during COVID-19. Caused by the excesses of the banking and finance sector, the GFC triggered regulatory intervention on an unprecedented scale. A key element has been enhancing institutions’ resilience and ensuring that any losses are predominantly borne by the institutions themselves, their investors and management (Part II below). During COVID-19, banks are no longer the problem, but an essential part of the solution: regulatory measures brought in only recently have to be relaxed and loan losses may have to be socialised again (Part III below). However, in the long term this will not be sustainable. In the aftermath of COVID-19, a new equilibrium will have to emerge where nonviable businesses can go insolvent and distressed banks can fail with as little public","PeriodicalId":88025,"journal":{"name":"King's law journal : KLJ","volume":"65 1","pages":"49 - 59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"King's law journal : KLJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09615768.2021.1886659","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 crisis has had a major impact across all sectors of the economy. For the most part, businesses and households have been affected negatively; although some, notably online retailers and streaming platforms, have significantly increased their profits. Alongside health care and the pharmaceutical industry, banking and finance will be essential for helping the real economy to get through the crisis, and for paving the way to economic recovery and a return to a more normal life. The liquidity generated by the vast stimulus and rescue programmes launched by governments and central banks around the world has to be channelled to businesses and households. To have any chance of financial survival, businesses and households in lockdown need leniency with their existing credit arrangements; new credit should flow freely. When the pressures of the pandemic eventually subside, the ensuing recovery will have to be funded largely through the money supply provided by commercial banks. To accommodate these needs, banking and finance law had to be adjusted, affecting both minute regulatory detail and broader private law principles. Overall, this process is part of a remarkable transformation: the villain of the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) has become one of the saviours during COVID-19. Caused by the excesses of the banking and finance sector, the GFC triggered regulatory intervention on an unprecedented scale. A key element has been enhancing institutions’ resilience and ensuring that any losses are predominantly borne by the institutions themselves, their investors and management (Part II below). During COVID-19, banks are no longer the problem, but an essential part of the solution: regulatory measures brought in only recently have to be relaxed and loan losses may have to be socialised again (Part III below). However, in the long term this will not be sustainable. In the aftermath of COVID-19, a new equilibrium will have to emerge where nonviable businesses can go insolvent and distressed banks can fail with as little public
2019冠状病毒病后的银行和金融
2019冠状病毒病危机对所有经济部门都产生了重大影响。在很大程度上,企业和家庭受到了负面影响;尽管其中一些,尤其是在线零售商和流媒体平台,已经大幅增加了利润。与医疗保健和制药业一样,银行业和金融业对于帮助实体经济度过危机、为经济复苏和回归更正常的生活铺平道路至关重要。世界各国政府和央行推出的大规模刺激和纾困计划所产生的流动性,必须流向企业和家庭。为了有任何财务生存的机会,被封锁的企业和家庭需要对现有的信贷安排进行宽大处理;新的信贷应该自由流动。当大流行的压力最终消退时,随后的复苏将主要通过商业银行提供的货币供应来提供资金。为了适应这些需要,必须调整银行和金融法,影响到细微的监管细节和更广泛的私法原则。总的来说,这一进程是一个显著转变的一部分:全球金融危机(GFC)的恶棍已成为COVID-19的救世主之一。由于银行和金融业的过度行为,全球金融危机引发了规模空前的监管干预。一个关键因素是增强机构的弹性,并确保任何损失主要由机构本身、投资者和管理层承担(下文第二部分)。在2019冠状病毒病期间,银行不再是问题所在,而是解决方案的重要组成部分:最近才出台的监管措施必须放松,贷款损失可能不得不再次社会化(下文第三部分)。然而,从长远来看,这是不可持续的。在2019冠状病毒病之后,必须出现一种新的平衡,无法生存的企业可能会破产,陷入困境的银行可能会在很少公开的情况下倒闭
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信