Inpatient Urine Cultures Are Frequently Performed Without Urinalysis or Microscopy: Findings From a Large Academic Medical Center

Abigail L. Carlson, S. Munigala, A. Russo, K. McMullen, Helen Wood, R. Jackups, D. Warren
{"title":"Inpatient Urine Cultures Are Frequently Performed Without Urinalysis or Microscopy: Findings From a Large Academic Medical Center","authors":"Abigail L. Carlson, S. Munigala, A. Russo, K. McMullen, Helen Wood, R. Jackups, D. Warren","doi":"10.1017/ice.2016.311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE To describe the frequency of urine cultures performed in inpatients without additional testing for pyuria DESIGN Retrospective cohort study SETTING A 1,250-bed academic tertiary referral center PATIENTS Hospitalized adults METHODS This study included urine cultures drawn on 4 medical and 2 surgical wards from 2009 to 2013 and in the medical and surgical intensive care units (ICUs) from 2012 to 2013. Patient and laboratory data were abstracted from the hospital’s medical informatics database. We identified catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) in the ICUs by routine infection prevention surveillance. Cultures without urinalysis or urine microscopy were defined as “isolated.” The primary outcome was the proportion of isolated urine cultures obtained. We used multivariable logistic regression to assess predictors of isolated cultures. RESULTS During the study period, 14,743 urine cultures were obtained (63.5 cultures per 1,000 patient days) during 11,820 patient admissions. Of these, 2,973 cultures (20.2%) were isolated cultures. Of the 61 CAUTIs identified, 31 (50.8%) were identified by an isolated culture. Predictors for having an isolated culture included male gender (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.22; 95%; confidence interval [CI], 1.11–1.35], urinary catheterization (aOR, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.89–2.46), ICU admission (medical ICU aOR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.47–2.00; surgical ICU aOR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.51–2.19), and obtaining the urine culture ≥1 calendar day after admission (1–7 days aOR, 1.91; 95% CI. 1.71–2.12; >7 days after admission aOR, 2.81; 95% CI, 2.37–3.34). CONCLUSIONS Isolated urine cultures are common in hospitalized patients, particularly in patients with urinary catheters and those in ICUs. Interventions targeting inpatient culturing practices may improve the diagnosis of urinary tract infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:455–460","PeriodicalId":13655,"journal":{"name":"Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology","volume":"15 1","pages":"455 - 460"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2016.311","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To describe the frequency of urine cultures performed in inpatients without additional testing for pyuria DESIGN Retrospective cohort study SETTING A 1,250-bed academic tertiary referral center PATIENTS Hospitalized adults METHODS This study included urine cultures drawn on 4 medical and 2 surgical wards from 2009 to 2013 and in the medical and surgical intensive care units (ICUs) from 2012 to 2013. Patient and laboratory data were abstracted from the hospital’s medical informatics database. We identified catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) in the ICUs by routine infection prevention surveillance. Cultures without urinalysis or urine microscopy were defined as “isolated.” The primary outcome was the proportion of isolated urine cultures obtained. We used multivariable logistic regression to assess predictors of isolated cultures. RESULTS During the study period, 14,743 urine cultures were obtained (63.5 cultures per 1,000 patient days) during 11,820 patient admissions. Of these, 2,973 cultures (20.2%) were isolated cultures. Of the 61 CAUTIs identified, 31 (50.8%) were identified by an isolated culture. Predictors for having an isolated culture included male gender (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.22; 95%; confidence interval [CI], 1.11–1.35], urinary catheterization (aOR, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.89–2.46), ICU admission (medical ICU aOR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.47–2.00; surgical ICU aOR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.51–2.19), and obtaining the urine culture ≥1 calendar day after admission (1–7 days aOR, 1.91; 95% CI. 1.71–2.12; >7 days after admission aOR, 2.81; 95% CI, 2.37–3.34). CONCLUSIONS Isolated urine cultures are common in hospitalized patients, particularly in patients with urinary catheters and those in ICUs. Interventions targeting inpatient culturing practices may improve the diagnosis of urinary tract infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:455–460
住院病人尿培养经常在没有尿液分析或显微镜的情况下进行:来自一个大型学术医疗中心的发现
回顾性队列研究设置了1250个床位的三级转诊中心住院成人患者。方法本研究包括2009年至2013年4个内科和2个外科病房以及2012年至2013年内科和外科重症监护病房(icu)的尿液培养。从医院的医学信息学数据库中提取患者和实验室数据。我们通过常规感染预防监测在icu中发现导管相关性尿路感染(CAUTIs)。未经尿液分析或尿液显微镜的培养物被定义为“分离的”。主要结果是获得分离尿液培养物的比例。我们使用多变量逻辑回归来评估分离培养物的预测因子。结果:在研究期间,在11,820例入院患者中,获得了14,743例尿液培养(每1,000患者日63.5例)。其中,2973个培养物(20.2%)为分离培养物。在鉴定的61例CAUTIs中,31例(50.8%)是通过分离培养鉴定的。孤立培养的预测因素包括男性(校正优势比[aOR], 1.22;95%;置信区间[CI], 1.11-1.35],导尿(aOR, 2.15;95% CI, 1.89-2.46), ICU入院(内科ICU aOR, 1.72;95% ci, 1.47-2.00;外科ICU aOR, 1.82;95% CI, 1.51-2.19),入院后≥1个日历日进行尿培养(1 - 7天aOR, 1.91;95%可信区间。1.71 - -2.12;>入院后7天aOR为2.81;95% ci, 2.37-3.34)。结论:分离尿培养在住院患者中很常见,特别是在有导尿管的患者和icu患者中。针对住院患者培养实践的干预措施可能提高尿路感染的诊断。中华流行病学杂志,2017;38 (4):455 - 456
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信