WHAT DID THUCYDIDES, SUN-TZU AND CLAUSEWITZ REALLY SAY? The issue of contradictory interpretations in the context of military strategy

IF 0.3 Q4 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Samuel Žilinčík, Ivo Pikner, Jaroslav Staněk
{"title":"WHAT DID THUCYDIDES, SUN-TZU AND CLAUSEWITZ REALLY SAY?\nThe issue of contradictory interpretations in the context of military strategy","authors":"Samuel Žilinčík, Ivo Pikner, Jaroslav Staněk","doi":"10.3849/1802-7199.22.2022.02.051-062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Classical strategic theorists constitute an important pillar of military strategy education, but their texts are often interpreted in contradictory ways. This article aims to draw attention to the problem of contrasting interpretations, focusing on the interpretations of Thucydides, Sun-Tzu and Clausewitz. The article surveys popular interpretations of these classics, identifies the main differences between them, and uses deductive logic to draw out the implications of this state of affairs for the study of military strategy.","PeriodicalId":40204,"journal":{"name":"Obrana a Strategie-Defence & Strategy","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obrana a Strategie-Defence & Strategy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3849/1802-7199.22.2022.02.051-062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Classical strategic theorists constitute an important pillar of military strategy education, but their texts are often interpreted in contradictory ways. This article aims to draw attention to the problem of contrasting interpretations, focusing on the interpretations of Thucydides, Sun-Tzu and Clausewitz. The article surveys popular interpretations of these classics, identifies the main differences between them, and uses deductive logic to draw out the implications of this state of affairs for the study of military strategy.
修昔底德、孙子和克劳塞维茨到底说了什么?军事战略背景下的矛盾解释问题
经典战略理论家是军事战略教育的重要支柱,但对其文本的解读往往相互矛盾。本文以修昔底德、孙子和克劳塞维茨的诠释为重点,探讨诠释的对比问题。本文考察了对这些经典的流行解释,确定了它们之间的主要差异,并使用演绎逻辑来得出这种情况对军事战略研究的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
50.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信