More than Just Eye-Catching: Evaluating Graphic Quality in Middle School English Language Learners’ Science Textbooks

Katherine Landau Wright, Erin M. McTigue, Zohreh R. Eslami, Dudley Reynolds
{"title":"More than Just Eye-Catching: Evaluating Graphic Quality in Middle School English Language Learners’ Science Textbooks","authors":"Katherine Landau Wright, Erin M. McTigue, Zohreh R. Eslami, Dudley Reynolds","doi":"10.3776/JOCI.%Y.V8I2P89-109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Second language (L2) instructors frequently use visual stimuli to support learning, particularly content-specific learning; however, not all visuals are effective in supporting curriculum.  Previous research has demonstrated that while graphics may make texts visually appealing, middle grade students, even native English speakers, are not consistently skilled in interpreting science diagrams and integrating textual and visual information simultaneously.  This study used the Graphics Analysis Protocol (GAP; Slough & McTigue, 2013), which has been used to assess U.S. science textbooks to evaluate how well graphics in scientific readings support both content knowledge and second language acquisition.  Our sample included 118 graphics from 54 readings used to teach science in English to 7 th and 8 th grade English language learners (ELL) in Qatar.  Our findings indicate that not only does poor integration of text and graphics fail to support student learning, but it also may hinder overall reading comprehension.  Results suggest that individuals selecting instructional materials for ELL need to evaluate visuals as part of the selection process, particularly with technical classes such as science.  Recommendations for practitioners are provided.Second language (L2) instructors frequently use visual stimuli to support learning, particularly content-specific learning; however, not all visuals are effective in supporting curriculum. Previous research has demonstrated that while graphics may make texts visually appealing, middle grade students, even native English speakers, are not consistently skilled in interpreting science diagrams and integrating textual and visual information simultaneously. This study used the Graphics Analysis Protocol (GAP; Slough & McTigue, 2013), which has been used to assess U.S. science textbooks to evaluate how well graphics in scientific readings support both content knowledge and second language acquisition. Our sample included 118 graphics from 54 readings used to teach science in English to 7 th and 8 th  grade English language learners (ELL) in Qatar. Our findings indicate that not only does poor integration of text and graphics fail to support student learning, but it also may hinder overall reading comprehension. Results suggest that individuals selecting instructional materials for ELL need to evaluate visuals as part of the selection process, particularly with technical classes such as science. Recommendations for practitioners are provided.","PeriodicalId":31424,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction","volume":"36 1","pages":"89-109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3776/JOCI.%Y.V8I2P89-109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Second language (L2) instructors frequently use visual stimuli to support learning, particularly content-specific learning; however, not all visuals are effective in supporting curriculum.  Previous research has demonstrated that while graphics may make texts visually appealing, middle grade students, even native English speakers, are not consistently skilled in interpreting science diagrams and integrating textual and visual information simultaneously.  This study used the Graphics Analysis Protocol (GAP; Slough & McTigue, 2013), which has been used to assess U.S. science textbooks to evaluate how well graphics in scientific readings support both content knowledge and second language acquisition.  Our sample included 118 graphics from 54 readings used to teach science in English to 7 th and 8 th grade English language learners (ELL) in Qatar.  Our findings indicate that not only does poor integration of text and graphics fail to support student learning, but it also may hinder overall reading comprehension.  Results suggest that individuals selecting instructional materials for ELL need to evaluate visuals as part of the selection process, particularly with technical classes such as science.  Recommendations for practitioners are provided.Second language (L2) instructors frequently use visual stimuli to support learning, particularly content-specific learning; however, not all visuals are effective in supporting curriculum. Previous research has demonstrated that while graphics may make texts visually appealing, middle grade students, even native English speakers, are not consistently skilled in interpreting science diagrams and integrating textual and visual information simultaneously. This study used the Graphics Analysis Protocol (GAP; Slough & McTigue, 2013), which has been used to assess U.S. science textbooks to evaluate how well graphics in scientific readings support both content knowledge and second language acquisition. Our sample included 118 graphics from 54 readings used to teach science in English to 7 th and 8 th  grade English language learners (ELL) in Qatar. Our findings indicate that not only does poor integration of text and graphics fail to support student learning, but it also may hinder overall reading comprehension. Results suggest that individuals selecting instructional materials for ELL need to evaluate visuals as part of the selection process, particularly with technical classes such as science. Recommendations for practitioners are provided.
不仅仅是引人注目:评价中学英语学习者科学教科书中的图形质量
第二语言(L2)教师经常使用视觉刺激来支持学习,特别是特定内容的学习;然而,并不是所有的视觉效果都能有效地支持课程。先前的研究表明,虽然图形可以使文本具有视觉吸引力,但初中学生,即使是以英语为母语的人,也不能始终熟练地解释科学图表并同时整合文本和视觉信息。本研究采用图形分析协议(GAP;Slough & McTigue, 2013),该研究已被用于评估美国科学教科书,以评估科学阅读中的图形对内容知识和第二语言习得的支持程度。我们的样本包括来自54个阅读材料的118个图形,这些阅读材料用于卡塔尔七年级和八年级英语学习者(ELL)的英语科学教学。我们的研究结果表明,文字和图形的整合不佳不仅不能支持学生的学习,而且还可能阻碍整体阅读理解。结果表明,个人在选择ELL教学材料时需要评估视觉效果,这是选择过程的一部分,特别是在科学等技术类课程中。为从业人员提供了建议。第二语言(L2)教师经常使用视觉刺激来支持学习,特别是特定内容的学习;然而,并不是所有的视觉效果都能有效地支持课程。先前的研究表明,虽然图形可以使文本具有视觉吸引力,但初中学生,即使是以英语为母语的人,也不能始终熟练地解释科学图表并同时整合文本和视觉信息。本研究采用图形分析协议(GAP;Slough & McTigue, 2013),该研究已被用于评估美国科学教科书,以评估科学阅读中的图形对内容知识和第二语言习得的支持程度。我们的样本包括来自54个阅读材料的118个图形,这些阅读材料用于卡塔尔七年级和八年级英语学习者(ELL)的英语科学教学。我们的研究结果表明,文字和图形的整合不佳不仅不能支持学生的学习,而且还可能阻碍整体阅读理解。结果表明,个人在选择ELL教学材料时需要评估视觉效果,这是选择过程的一部分,特别是在科学等技术类课程中。为从业人员提供了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信