Comparative study on the performance of face recognition algorithms

Q3 Engineering
Truong Van Nguyen, Tuan Duc Chu
{"title":"Comparative study on the performance of face recognition algorithms","authors":"Truong Van Nguyen, Tuan Duc Chu","doi":"10.21303/2461-4262.2023.002831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Facial and object recognition are more and more applied in our life. Therefore, this field has become important to both academicians and practitioners. Face recognition systems are complex systems using features of the face to recognize. Current face recognition systems may be used to increase work efficiency in various methods, including smart homes, online banking, traffic, sports, robots, and others. With various applications like this, the number of facial recognition methods has been increasing in recent years. However, the performance of face recognition systems can be significantly affected by various factors such as lighting conditions, and different types of masks (sunglasses, scarves, hats, etc.). In this paper, a detailed comparison between face recognition techniques is exposed by listing the structure of each model, the advantages and disadvantages as well as performing experiments to demonstrate the robustness, accuracy, and complexity of each algorithm. To be detailed, let’s give a performance comparison of three methods for measuring the efficacy of face recognition systems including a support vector machine (SVM), a visual geometry group with 16 layers (VGG-16), and a residual network with 50 layers (ResNet-50) in real-life settings. The efficiency of algorithms is evaluated in various environments such as normal light indoors, backlit indoors, low light indoors, natural light outdoors, and backlit outdoors. In addition, this paper also evaluates faces with hats and glasses to examine the accuracy of the methods. The experimental results indicate that the ResNet-50 has the highest accuracy to identify faces. The time to recognize is ranging from 1.1s to 1.2s in the normal environment","PeriodicalId":11804,"journal":{"name":"EUREKA: Physics and Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EUREKA: Physics and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21303/2461-4262.2023.002831","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Facial and object recognition are more and more applied in our life. Therefore, this field has become important to both academicians and practitioners. Face recognition systems are complex systems using features of the face to recognize. Current face recognition systems may be used to increase work efficiency in various methods, including smart homes, online banking, traffic, sports, robots, and others. With various applications like this, the number of facial recognition methods has been increasing in recent years. However, the performance of face recognition systems can be significantly affected by various factors such as lighting conditions, and different types of masks (sunglasses, scarves, hats, etc.). In this paper, a detailed comparison between face recognition techniques is exposed by listing the structure of each model, the advantages and disadvantages as well as performing experiments to demonstrate the robustness, accuracy, and complexity of each algorithm. To be detailed, let’s give a performance comparison of three methods for measuring the efficacy of face recognition systems including a support vector machine (SVM), a visual geometry group with 16 layers (VGG-16), and a residual network with 50 layers (ResNet-50) in real-life settings. The efficiency of algorithms is evaluated in various environments such as normal light indoors, backlit indoors, low light indoors, natural light outdoors, and backlit outdoors. In addition, this paper also evaluates faces with hats and glasses to examine the accuracy of the methods. The experimental results indicate that the ResNet-50 has the highest accuracy to identify faces. The time to recognize is ranging from 1.1s to 1.2s in the normal environment
人脸识别算法性能的比较研究
人脸识别和物体识别在我们的生活中得到越来越多的应用。因此,这一领域对学术界和实践者来说都很重要。人脸识别系统是利用人脸特征进行识别的复杂系统。目前的人脸识别系统可以通过各种方式提高工作效率,包括智能家居、网上银行、交通、体育、机器人等。随着这样的各种应用,近年来面部识别方法的数量不断增加。然而,人脸识别系统的性能会受到各种因素的显著影响,例如照明条件和不同类型的面具(太阳镜、围巾、帽子等)。在本文中,通过列出每种模型的结构、优缺点,并通过实验来展示每种算法的鲁棒性、准确性和复杂性,对人脸识别技术进行了详细的比较。为了详细说明,让我们在现实环境中对三种测量人脸识别系统有效性的方法进行性能比较,包括支持向量机(SVM)、16层视觉几何组(VGG-16)和50层残差网络(ResNet-50)。算法在室内正常光照、室内背光、室内弱光、室外自然光和室外背光等环境下的效率进行了评估。此外,本文还对戴着帽子和眼镜的人脸进行了评估,以检验方法的准确性。实验结果表明,ResNet-50具有最高的人脸识别准确率。正常环境下的识别时间在1.1s到1.2s之间
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
EUREKA: Physics and Engineering
EUREKA: Physics and Engineering Engineering-Engineering (all)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
78
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信