Stimulus control of eye orientations: Shaping S+ only versus shaping S- only

M. Elizabeth Stella , Barbara C. Etzel
{"title":"Stimulus control of eye orientations: Shaping S+ only versus shaping S- only","authors":"M. Elizabeth Stella ,&nbsp;Barbara C. Etzel","doi":"10.1016/0270-4684(86)90011-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To determine how stimulus control of eye orientation was established and how that process affected learning, an analysis of normal preschool children's eye orientations and pointing responses to each of two simultaneously presented stimuli (S+ and S-) was conducted. Using a probe design to test for acquisition, each subject was trained on two tasks. In one task, S+ (selections of this stimulus produced reinforcement) was held constant at the final criterion level while S- (selections of this stimulus never produced reinforcement) was manipulated using stimulus shaping procedures. The second task was programmed with the opposite method (S+ shaped while S- held constant). Results showed that more pointing response errors, more occurences of eye orientations, and longer durations of eye orientations characterized conditions where S+ was held constant and S- was shaped. The individual analysis of the eye orientation data indicated that differences in eye orientation to stimuli under the two programs were largely due to relatively higher frequency of orientation to the S- stimulus under program condtions that shaped S- and held S+ constant.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100080,"journal":{"name":"Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0270-4684(86)90011-X","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/027046848690011X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

To determine how stimulus control of eye orientation was established and how that process affected learning, an analysis of normal preschool children's eye orientations and pointing responses to each of two simultaneously presented stimuli (S+ and S-) was conducted. Using a probe design to test for acquisition, each subject was trained on two tasks. In one task, S+ (selections of this stimulus produced reinforcement) was held constant at the final criterion level while S- (selections of this stimulus never produced reinforcement) was manipulated using stimulus shaping procedures. The second task was programmed with the opposite method (S+ shaped while S- held constant). Results showed that more pointing response errors, more occurences of eye orientations, and longer durations of eye orientations characterized conditions where S+ was held constant and S- was shaped. The individual analysis of the eye orientation data indicated that differences in eye orientation to stimuli under the two programs were largely due to relatively higher frequency of orientation to the S- stimulus under program condtions that shaped S- and held S+ constant.

眼睛方向的刺激控制:仅成形S+与仅成形S-
为了确定刺激对眼睛定向的控制是如何建立的,以及这一过程是如何影响学习的,我们分析了正常学龄前儿童对同时呈现的两种刺激(S+和S-)的眼睛定向和指向反应。使用探针设计来测试获取,每个受试者接受两项任务的训练。在一项任务中,S+(选择该刺激会产生强化)在最终标准水平保持不变,而S-(选择该刺激不会产生强化)通过刺激成形程序进行操纵。第二个任务用相反的方法编程(S+形而S-保持不变)。结果表明,当S+保持不变,S-成形时,指向响应误差增大,眼睛定向发生次数增多,眼睛定向持续时间延长。对眼睛定向数据的个体分析表明,在两种方案下,眼睛对刺激的定向差异主要是由于在形成S-并保持S+不变的方案条件下,对S-刺激的定向频率相对较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信