Developing inductions to support mental health and wellbeing in doctoral researchers: findings from a qualitative co-design study with doctoral researchers and university stakeholders

IF 2.6 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
P. Jackman, Rebecca Sanderson, Lisalyn R. Jacobs
{"title":"Developing inductions to support mental health and wellbeing in doctoral researchers: findings from a qualitative co-design study with doctoral researchers and university stakeholders","authors":"P. Jackman, Rebecca Sanderson, Lisalyn R. Jacobs","doi":"10.1080/21568235.2021.1992293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Concerns about mental health and wellbeing in doctoral researchers have grown in recent years. To address these concerns, preventative strategies that seek to mitigate the onset of poor mental health and wellbeing could be valuable. This article outlines the co-design approach adopted to generate evidence that could inform the design of inductions to support mental health and wellbeing in doctoral researchers. Over a 9-month period, we collaborated with 47 doctoral researchers from 24 institutions and 13 stakeholders from one university, collecting qualitative data via focus groups and follow-up surveys. After analysing our data thematically and making refinements based on feedback from participants, actionable strategies that could be considered in the design of induction programmes for doctoral researchers were generated and captured by five themes: peer connections; supervisor relationships; information and resources; student services advice and support; and training and development. Feedback on the co-design process suggested participants felt positive about their involvement, with the doctoral researchers valuing the opportunity to contribute to the development of the co-designed evidence. Further research is required to examine the efficacy of the identified strategies, but we suggest that co-design shows promise for developing inductions to support mental health and wellbeing in doctoral researchers.","PeriodicalId":37345,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Higher Education","volume":"13 1","pages":"62 - 79"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2021.1992293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

ABSTRACT Concerns about mental health and wellbeing in doctoral researchers have grown in recent years. To address these concerns, preventative strategies that seek to mitigate the onset of poor mental health and wellbeing could be valuable. This article outlines the co-design approach adopted to generate evidence that could inform the design of inductions to support mental health and wellbeing in doctoral researchers. Over a 9-month period, we collaborated with 47 doctoral researchers from 24 institutions and 13 stakeholders from one university, collecting qualitative data via focus groups and follow-up surveys. After analysing our data thematically and making refinements based on feedback from participants, actionable strategies that could be considered in the design of induction programmes for doctoral researchers were generated and captured by five themes: peer connections; supervisor relationships; information and resources; student services advice and support; and training and development. Feedback on the co-design process suggested participants felt positive about their involvement, with the doctoral researchers valuing the opportunity to contribute to the development of the co-designed evidence. Further research is required to examine the efficacy of the identified strategies, but we suggest that co-design shows promise for developing inductions to support mental health and wellbeing in doctoral researchers.
发展诱导以支持博士研究人员的心理健康和福祉:来自与博士研究人员和大学利益相关者的定性共同设计研究的结果
近年来,人们越来越关注博士研究人员的心理健康和福祉。为了解决这些问题,寻求缓解不良心理健康和福祉的预防战略可能是有价值的。本文概述了采用共同设计方法来产生证据,这些证据可以为支持博士研究人员心理健康和福祉的诱导设计提供信息。在9个月的时间里,我们与来自24个机构的47名博士研究员和来自一所大学的13名利益相关者合作,通过焦点小组和随访调查收集定性数据。在对我们的数据进行主题分析并根据参与者的反馈进行改进后,我们生成了可在博士研究人员入门课程设计中考虑的可操作策略,并通过五个主题进行了捕获:同行联系;上下级关系;信息和资源;学生服务建议及支援;培训和发展。对共同设计过程的反馈表明,参与者对他们的参与感到积极,博士研究人员重视为共同设计证据的发展做出贡献的机会。需要进一步的研究来检验确定的策略的有效性,但我们认为,共同设计显示出开发支持博士研究人员心理健康和福祉的诱导的希望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Higher Education
European Journal of Higher Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Higher Education (EJHE) aims to offer comprehensive coverage of theoretical and methodological approaches to the study of higher education, analyses of European and national higher education reforms and processes, and European comparative studies or comparisons between European and non-European higher education systems and institutions. Building on the successful legacy of its predecessor, Higher Education in Europe, EJHE is establishing itself as one of the flagship journals in the study of higher education and specifically in study of European higher education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信