Self-deliberation and the Strategy of the Pseudo-dialogue

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
C. Tindale
{"title":"Self-deliberation and the Strategy of the Pseudo-dialogue","authors":"C. Tindale","doi":"10.17230/co-herencia.17.32.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"* Ph.D. in Philosophy from the University of Waterloo. Director, Centre for Research in Reasoning, Argumentation and Rhetoric, & Professor, Department of Philosophy University of Windsor, Canada. orcid: 0000-00022820-1416 Abstract The New Rhetoric identifies the self-deliberator as one of three main types of audience. But such a turn toward the self is at odds with studies of contemporary argumentation, particularly social argumentation. Argumentation takes place “out there”, modifying the environments in which audiences operate. Equally interesting is the use of self-deliberation as a rhetorical strategy. Arguing with oneself, especially when that self is distanced in some way from the individual involved, employs self-deliberation beyond the ends that Perelman assigned to it. In this paper, my goal is to explore the nature of the self-deliberator as an audience and selfdeliberation as a rhetorical strategy employed in argumentation.","PeriodicalId":41856,"journal":{"name":"Co-herencia","volume":"46 1","pages":"159-178"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Co-herencia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17230/co-herencia.17.32.6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

* Ph.D. in Philosophy from the University of Waterloo. Director, Centre for Research in Reasoning, Argumentation and Rhetoric, & Professor, Department of Philosophy University of Windsor, Canada. orcid: 0000-00022820-1416 Abstract The New Rhetoric identifies the self-deliberator as one of three main types of audience. But such a turn toward the self is at odds with studies of contemporary argumentation, particularly social argumentation. Argumentation takes place “out there”, modifying the environments in which audiences operate. Equally interesting is the use of self-deliberation as a rhetorical strategy. Arguing with oneself, especially when that self is distanced in some way from the individual involved, employs self-deliberation beyond the ends that Perelman assigned to it. In this paper, my goal is to explore the nature of the self-deliberator as an audience and selfdeliberation as a rhetorical strategy employed in argumentation.
自我思考与伪对话策略
滑铁卢大学哲学博士。推理、论证与修辞研究中心主任,加拿大温莎大学哲学系教授。摘要《新修辞学》将自我反思者视为三种主要受众类型之一。但这种对自我的转向与当代论证的研究,尤其是社会论证的研究是不一致的。辩论发生在“外面”,改变了听众的操作环境。同样有趣的是将自我思考作为一种修辞策略。与自己争论,尤其是当这个自我在某种程度上与所涉及的个人保持距离时,会使自我深思熟虑超出佩雷尔曼赋予它的目的。在本文中,我的目标是探讨作为听众的自我审议的本质和自我审议作为一种修辞策略在辩论中使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Co-herencia
Co-herencia HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信