R. Hediger, D. Wyatt, F. White, P. Ward, S. Donaldson, Matthew Kineen, P. Hays, Stacey Guill, L. Godfrey, T. Bevilacqua, Iñaki Sagarna, Lesley C. Pleasant
{"title":"Abbreviations For the Works of Ernest Hemingway","authors":"R. Hediger, D. Wyatt, F. White, P. Ward, S. Donaldson, Matthew Kineen, P. Hays, Stacey Guill, L. Godfrey, T. Bevilacqua, Iñaki Sagarna, Lesley C. Pleasant","doi":"10.1353/hem.2021.0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:This essay reads Hemingway’s short story “The Snows of Kilimanjaro” as an allegory of the Anthropocene. The story presents an effort to rethink how to live, a concern that animated much of Hemingway’s writing and thinking. This rethinking involves dramatically exposing the faults of the narrator, who, read allegorically—in a general, not strict, way—evokes many of the values and systems of production that led to the Anthropocene. Thus, the narrator’s self-critique can also be read as a cultural critique, one sharpened and fitted to Anthropocene temporalities by the story’s “telescoping” technique.","PeriodicalId":22434,"journal":{"name":"The Hemingway Review","volume":"311 1","pages":"100 - 101 - 105 - 106 - 107 - 108 - 110 - 111 - 113 - 114 - 117 - 117 - 119 - 27 - 28 - 42 - 43 - 6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Hemingway Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/hem.2021.0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACT:This essay reads Hemingway’s short story “The Snows of Kilimanjaro” as an allegory of the Anthropocene. The story presents an effort to rethink how to live, a concern that animated much of Hemingway’s writing and thinking. This rethinking involves dramatically exposing the faults of the narrator, who, read allegorically—in a general, not strict, way—evokes many of the values and systems of production that led to the Anthropocene. Thus, the narrator’s self-critique can also be read as a cultural critique, one sharpened and fitted to Anthropocene temporalities by the story’s “telescoping” technique.