Moving the needle on qualitative approaches to studying HRD

IF 2.3 Q3 MANAGEMENT
R. Grenier, P. Williams, Yonjoo Cho
{"title":"Moving the needle on qualitative approaches to studying HRD","authors":"R. Grenier, P. Williams, Yonjoo Cho","doi":"10.1108/ejtd-02-2022-0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to conclude this special issue on innovation in qualitative research by addressing the preceding papers in relation to the work of Human Resource Development (HRD) scholars and scholar-practitioners, consider the implications to the field of HRD and point to additional directions for innovative qualitative approaches. The authors use the term “innovative” to mean either an approach (or technique) that is newly conceived or one that is new to HRD (or little used).\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe authors reviewed the papers in the special issue, identified other innovative qualitative approaches from the HRD literature and described briefly additional innovative approaches from other fields to suggest future directions for HRD professionals.\n\n\nFindings\nIn this review, the authors noted the relatively few approaches to qualitative research that have been used regularly in HRD literature and suggested further innovative approaches that could deepen the understanding of organizations, including narrative, visual and indigenous methods, among others.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis paper provides for HRD scholars an overview of a few qualitative research methodologies that are new to HRD and identifies additional approaches and epistemological challenges that could be valuable for future inquiry into complex organizations by HRD scholars and practitioners.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe authors suggest various feasible approaches and tools for HRD professionals to inquire into their practice in organizations to identify needs, evaluate outcomes and inquire into socially complex issues.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study’s intent is to encourage the use of various innovative qualitative inquiry approaches when appropriate to understand and transform organizations. In particular, this study encourages the approaches that center the voices and experiences of those being studied and emphasizes the ways of listening to voices from the margins that may have been ignored previously.\n","PeriodicalId":46786,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Training and Development","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Training and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ejtd-02-2022-0019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to conclude this special issue on innovation in qualitative research by addressing the preceding papers in relation to the work of Human Resource Development (HRD) scholars and scholar-practitioners, consider the implications to the field of HRD and point to additional directions for innovative qualitative approaches. The authors use the term “innovative” to mean either an approach (or technique) that is newly conceived or one that is new to HRD (or little used). Design/methodology/approach The authors reviewed the papers in the special issue, identified other innovative qualitative approaches from the HRD literature and described briefly additional innovative approaches from other fields to suggest future directions for HRD professionals. Findings In this review, the authors noted the relatively few approaches to qualitative research that have been used regularly in HRD literature and suggested further innovative approaches that could deepen the understanding of organizations, including narrative, visual and indigenous methods, among others. Research limitations/implications This paper provides for HRD scholars an overview of a few qualitative research methodologies that are new to HRD and identifies additional approaches and epistemological challenges that could be valuable for future inquiry into complex organizations by HRD scholars and practitioners. Practical implications The authors suggest various feasible approaches and tools for HRD professionals to inquire into their practice in organizations to identify needs, evaluate outcomes and inquire into socially complex issues. Originality/value This study’s intent is to encourage the use of various innovative qualitative inquiry approaches when appropriate to understand and transform organizations. In particular, this study encourages the approaches that center the voices and experiences of those being studied and emphasizes the ways of listening to voices from the margins that may have been ignored previously.
在研究人力资源开发的定性方法上取得进展
本文的目的是通过处理与人力资源开发(HRD)学者和学者实践者的工作相关的先前论文来总结这一关于定性研究创新的特殊问题,考虑对人力资源开发领域的影响,并指出创新定性方法的其他方向。作者使用“创新”一词来表示新构思的方法(或技术)或对HRD来说是新的(或很少使用的)。设计/方法/方法作者回顾了特刊中的论文,从人力资源开发文献中确定了其他创新的定性方法,并简要描述了其他领域的其他创新方法,以建议人力资源开发专业人员的未来方向。在本综述中,作者注意到在人力资源开发文献中经常使用的定性研究方法相对较少,并提出了进一步的创新方法,可以加深对组织的理解,包括叙述、视觉和土著方法等。本文为人力资源开发学者提供了一些定性研究方法的概述,这些方法对人力资源开发来说是新的,并确定了其他方法和认识论挑战,这些方法和认识论挑战可能对人力资源开发学者和实践者未来对复杂组织的研究有价值。实践意义作者为人力资源开发专业人员提供了各种可行的方法和工具,以调查他们在组织中的实践,以确定需求,评估结果和调查社会复杂问题。原创性/价值本研究的目的是鼓励在适当的时候使用各种创新的定性调查方法来理解和改造组织。尤其值得一提的是,这项研究鼓励以被研究对象的声音和经历为中心的方法,并强调倾听以前可能被忽视的边缘声音的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
13.60%
发文量
53
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信