Left ventricular septal pacing: how deep is enough?

K. Čurila, P. Jurák, P. Waldauf, J. Halámek, P. Stros, R. Smíšek, F. Plesinger, L. Znojilova, P. Leinveber, I. Viscor, D. Heřman, P. Osmančík, F. Prinzen
{"title":"Left ventricular septal pacing: how deep is enough?","authors":"K. Čurila, P. Jurák, P. Waldauf, J. Halámek, P. Stros, R. Smíšek, F. Plesinger, L. Znojilova, P. Leinveber, I. Viscor, D. Heřman, P. Osmančík, F. Prinzen","doi":"10.1093/europace/euac053.431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Type of funding sources: Public Institution(s). Main funding source(s): Charles University Research Program When pacing in the left septal area, it is not clear where the pacing lead needs to be implanted to obtain the most physiological ventricular activation during pure myocardial pacing. To use UHF-ECG to compare ventricular activation between myocardial pacing of the left septum with and without the possibility to capture the left bundle branch by high output pacing. This was a retrospective study of patients with bradycardia and deep septal myocardial pacing close to LBB (paraLBBP) or deep septal pacing more distant from LBB (DSTP), which both produced a pseudo-right bundle branch morphology in V1. During paraLBBP, left bundle branch capture was feasible during increasing pacing output up to 5V at 0.5 ms, but during DSTP, LBB capture was not possible during high output pacing. Only patients with both paraLBBP and DSTP were analyzed. Paced QRS morphology, presence of LBBpotential, QRSduration, R wave peak time (RWPT) in V5, lead depth in the septum and UHF-ECG parameters of dyssynchrony, i.e., e-DYS as the difference between the first and last ventricular activation and local depolarization durations in precordial leads (V1-V8d) were compared between them. From 119 consecutive bradycardia patients enrolled, we identified 23 with both paraLBBP and DSTP during an implant procedure. On X-ray, a lead tip was placed shallower during DSTP than paraLBBP (12 ± 3 vs. 15 ± 3 mm, p < 0.001). A pseudo right bundle branch block morphology was present in all cases, but LBB potential was more frequently present in paraLBBP (17 of 23) than in DSTP (4 of 36; p < 0.0001). QRSd was not significantly different (146 ± 14 vs. 142 ± 14 ms, p = 0.08), but DSTP had longer V5RWPT (86 ± 11 vs. 83 ± 9 ms; p = 0.03). paraLBBP resulted in larger interventricular dyssynchrony, e-DYS (-20 ± 15 vs. -12 ± 18 ms; p = 0.046), the same V1-6d, but its local depolarization durations in V7 and V8 (V7 and V8d) were shorter compared to DSTP (-5 and -7 ms; p < 0.05). Interventricular dyssynchrony and LV lateral wall depolarization during myocardial pacing of the left septum are dependent on the relation of the leads´ tip to the LBB. Pacing positions closer to the LBB are responsible for bigger interventricular dyssynchrony and more physiological LV lateral wall depolarization.","PeriodicalId":11720,"journal":{"name":"EP Europace","volume":"123 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EP Europace","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euac053.431","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Type of funding sources: Public Institution(s). Main funding source(s): Charles University Research Program When pacing in the left septal area, it is not clear where the pacing lead needs to be implanted to obtain the most physiological ventricular activation during pure myocardial pacing. To use UHF-ECG to compare ventricular activation between myocardial pacing of the left septum with and without the possibility to capture the left bundle branch by high output pacing. This was a retrospective study of patients with bradycardia and deep septal myocardial pacing close to LBB (paraLBBP) or deep septal pacing more distant from LBB (DSTP), which both produced a pseudo-right bundle branch morphology in V1. During paraLBBP, left bundle branch capture was feasible during increasing pacing output up to 5V at 0.5 ms, but during DSTP, LBB capture was not possible during high output pacing. Only patients with both paraLBBP and DSTP were analyzed. Paced QRS morphology, presence of LBBpotential, QRSduration, R wave peak time (RWPT) in V5, lead depth in the septum and UHF-ECG parameters of dyssynchrony, i.e., e-DYS as the difference between the first and last ventricular activation and local depolarization durations in precordial leads (V1-V8d) were compared between them. From 119 consecutive bradycardia patients enrolled, we identified 23 with both paraLBBP and DSTP during an implant procedure. On X-ray, a lead tip was placed shallower during DSTP than paraLBBP (12 ± 3 vs. 15 ± 3 mm, p < 0.001). A pseudo right bundle branch block morphology was present in all cases, but LBB potential was more frequently present in paraLBBP (17 of 23) than in DSTP (4 of 36; p < 0.0001). QRSd was not significantly different (146 ± 14 vs. 142 ± 14 ms, p = 0.08), but DSTP had longer V5RWPT (86 ± 11 vs. 83 ± 9 ms; p = 0.03). paraLBBP resulted in larger interventricular dyssynchrony, e-DYS (-20 ± 15 vs. -12 ± 18 ms; p = 0.046), the same V1-6d, but its local depolarization durations in V7 and V8 (V7 and V8d) were shorter compared to DSTP (-5 and -7 ms; p < 0.05). Interventricular dyssynchrony and LV lateral wall depolarization during myocardial pacing of the left septum are dependent on the relation of the leads´ tip to the LBB. Pacing positions closer to the LBB are responsible for bigger interventricular dyssynchrony and more physiological LV lateral wall depolarization.
左室间隔起搏:多深才够?
资金来源类型:公共机构。当起搏在左间隔区域时,在纯心肌起搏时,起搏导联需要植入何处才能获得最大的生理心室激活尚不清楚。采用超高频心电图(UHF-ECG)比较高输出起搏可捕获左束支和不捕获左中隔心肌起搏时的心室激活情况。这是一项回顾性研究,心动过缓和深间隔心肌起搏靠近LBB (paraLBBP)或深间隔起搏远离LBB (DSTP)的患者,这两种情况都在V1区产生伪右束支形态。在paraLBBP期间,在0.5 ms时将起搏输出增加到5V时,左束分支捕获是可行的,但在DSTP期间,在高输出起搏时不可能捕获LBB。我们只分析了同时患有paraLBBP和DSTP的患者。比较两组间节律性QRS形态、lbbb电位存在、qr饱和度、V5区R波峰值时间(RWPT)、中隔导联深度、非同步化的UHF-ECG参数,即首末次心室激活差值e-DYS和心前导联局部去极化持续时间(V1-V8d)。从连续纳入的119例心动过缓患者中,我们确定了23例在植入过程中同时患有paraLBBP和DSTP。在x线上,DSTP期间铅头的位置比palbbp更浅(12±3比15±3 mm, p < 0.001)。所有病例均存在伪右束分支阻滞形态,但LBB电位在paraLBBP(23例中有17例)比DSTP(36例中有4例)更常见;P < 0.0001)。QRSd差异无统计学意义(146±14比142±14 ms, p = 0.08),但DSTP的V5RWPT更长(86±11比83±9 ms;P = 0.03)。副bbp导致更大的室间不同步,e-DYS(-20±15 vs -12±18 ms;p = 0.046), V1-6d相同,但V7和V8的局部去极化持续时间(V7和V8d)比DSTP短(-5和-7 ms;P < 0.05)。左中隔心肌起搏期间的室间非同步化和左室侧壁去极化取决于导联尖端与左室的关系。起搏位置越靠近LBB,室间非同步化越严重,左室侧壁去极化越生理性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信