Dose-to-medium vs. dose-to-water: Dosimetric evaluation of head and neck VMAT cases using Monaco treatment planning system

S. K. Gopal, P. Dash
{"title":"Dose-to-medium vs. dose-to-water: Dosimetric evaluation of head and neck VMAT cases using Monaco treatment planning system","authors":"S. K. Gopal, P. Dash","doi":"10.14319/IJCTO.44.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: In this paper, we evaluate the dosimetric differences between absorbed dose to water and absorbed dose to medium in Monte Carlo (MC)-based calculations used for radiation therapy treatment plans. Methods: Thirty-four treated Head and Neck simultaneously integrated boost cases were analyzed retrospectively. All of them were planned by Monaco treatment planning system (TPS), calculated and reviewed on absorbed dose to medium (D m ) calculations and treated in Elekta Versa HD LINAC. Absorbed dose to medium D m was converted to absorbed dose to water D w in Monaco treatment planning system using the procedure based on stopping power ratios and the Bragg-Gray cavity theory. Dosimetric parameters were then compared and analyzed with respect to absorbed dose to medium (D m ) calculations for multiple planning target volumes (PTVs) and critical organs such as brainstem, spinal cord, left and right lens, left and right parotids, larynx, left and right middle ear and lips. Results: It was found that mean and minimum D w (i.e. D w mean and D w min ) of organs at risk did not differ much (hardly differing by 0.8-2%) with respect to those of the absorbed dose to medium. However maximum D w (i.e. D w max ) in case of lips, left and right middle ear were found to differ more than 4% with respect to D m max . For serial organs brainstem and spinal cord, maximum dose D w max were found to vary around 1% and 2%, respectively, with respect to absorbed dose to medium dose calculation. In case of PTVs, the mean percentages variation of D w min and D w mean were found to be less than 1 %, although the variation of maximum D w was found to be high around 5-7% with respect to that of D m . Conclusion: The comparative analysis of dosimetric parameters in the present study shows that the selection of either D m or D w in Monaco planning system is less likely to produce any significant clinical effect in tumor control and to the damage of organs at risk.","PeriodicalId":13931,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cancer Therapy and Oncology","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cancer Therapy and Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14319/IJCTO.44.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose: In this paper, we evaluate the dosimetric differences between absorbed dose to water and absorbed dose to medium in Monte Carlo (MC)-based calculations used for radiation therapy treatment plans. Methods: Thirty-four treated Head and Neck simultaneously integrated boost cases were analyzed retrospectively. All of them were planned by Monaco treatment planning system (TPS), calculated and reviewed on absorbed dose to medium (D m ) calculations and treated in Elekta Versa HD LINAC. Absorbed dose to medium D m was converted to absorbed dose to water D w in Monaco treatment planning system using the procedure based on stopping power ratios and the Bragg-Gray cavity theory. Dosimetric parameters were then compared and analyzed with respect to absorbed dose to medium (D m ) calculations for multiple planning target volumes (PTVs) and critical organs such as brainstem, spinal cord, left and right lens, left and right parotids, larynx, left and right middle ear and lips. Results: It was found that mean and minimum D w (i.e. D w mean and D w min ) of organs at risk did not differ much (hardly differing by 0.8-2%) with respect to those of the absorbed dose to medium. However maximum D w (i.e. D w max ) in case of lips, left and right middle ear were found to differ more than 4% with respect to D m max . For serial organs brainstem and spinal cord, maximum dose D w max were found to vary around 1% and 2%, respectively, with respect to absorbed dose to medium dose calculation. In case of PTVs, the mean percentages variation of D w min and D w mean were found to be less than 1 %, although the variation of maximum D w was found to be high around 5-7% with respect to that of D m . Conclusion: The comparative analysis of dosimetric parameters in the present study shows that the selection of either D m or D w in Monaco planning system is less likely to produce any significant clinical effect in tumor control and to the damage of organs at risk.
剂量-介质vs.剂量-水:使用摩纳哥治疗计划系统对头颈部VMAT病例进行剂量学评价
目的:在本文中,我们评估了基于蒙特卡罗(MC)计算的放射治疗计划中对水吸收剂量和对介质吸收剂量的剂量学差异。方法:回顾性分析34例头颈部同时整合式提升术病例。所有患者均采用摩纳哥治疗计划系统(TPS)计划,进行吸收剂量对介质(D m)计算和复习,并在Elekta Versa HD LINAC中处理。采用基于停止功率比和Bragg-Gray空腔理论的程序,将摩纳哥处理计划系统中对介质的吸收剂量D m转换为对水的吸收剂量D w。然后比较和分析剂量学参数与多计划靶体积(pvs)和关键器官(如脑干、脊髓、左右晶状体、左右腮腺、喉部、左右中耳和嘴唇)的吸收剂量对介质(D m)计算。结果:危险器官的平均和最小dw(即dw均值和dw min)与吸收剂量对介质的差异不大(相差0.8-2%)。然而,唇部、左中耳和右中耳的最大dw(即dw max)相对于dm max的差异大于4%。对于系列器官,脑干和脊髓,相对于吸收剂量与中剂量的计算,最大剂量dw max分别变化约1%和2%。在ptv中,dw min和dw mean的平均百分比变化小于1%,但最大dw相对于dm的变化高达5-7%左右。结论:本研究剂量学参数的比较分析表明,在摩纳哥计划系统中,选择D - m或D - w对肿瘤控制和危及器官损害的临床效果较差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书