"Public Health Is Purchasable".

H. Markel
{"title":"\"Public Health Is Purchasable\".","authors":"H. Markel","doi":"10.1111/1468-0009.12202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A s I write these words in the early weeks of summer, the Ebola fever panic of 2014 has long since receded into our collective rearview mirror and the number of Zika virus cases, along with the discovery of more and more babies with Zika-induced microcephaly, is steadily increasing. By the time you read this column, swarms of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus mosquitoes carrying the virus will have likely traveled from South America to points north, east, and west, accompanied by the predictable media hoopla that characterizes every American epidemic. Sadly, the interregna between the many contagious crises of the still young 21st century have been characterized by a global amnesia. As the “epi curve” of each scourge descends, public health officials, elected leaders, and the population at large turn their attention to other issues at the expense of planning for the next newly emerging infectious disease. And just as predictably, the appearance of each new pandemic or epidemic inspires a situation in which our public health officials must waste valuable time and energy securing adequate government funding to fight and contain the new threat. Ironically, in 1983, the US Congress established a public health emergency fund, much like the one for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) uses to rapidly respond to natural disasters. Yet the balance of that federal public health emergency fund, as of June 2, 2016, was a mere $57,000! This sorry situation serves to remind us of, perhaps, the savviest paragraph on public health ever composed; it is one I will quote in 2 parts as this essay progresses. Let’s begin with the opening lines of what ought to be memorized as public health gospel:","PeriodicalId":78777,"journal":{"name":"The Milbank Memorial Fund quarterly","volume":"32 1","pages":"441-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Milbank Memorial Fund quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

A s I write these words in the early weeks of summer, the Ebola fever panic of 2014 has long since receded into our collective rearview mirror and the number of Zika virus cases, along with the discovery of more and more babies with Zika-induced microcephaly, is steadily increasing. By the time you read this column, swarms of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus mosquitoes carrying the virus will have likely traveled from South America to points north, east, and west, accompanied by the predictable media hoopla that characterizes every American epidemic. Sadly, the interregna between the many contagious crises of the still young 21st century have been characterized by a global amnesia. As the “epi curve” of each scourge descends, public health officials, elected leaders, and the population at large turn their attention to other issues at the expense of planning for the next newly emerging infectious disease. And just as predictably, the appearance of each new pandemic or epidemic inspires a situation in which our public health officials must waste valuable time and energy securing adequate government funding to fight and contain the new threat. Ironically, in 1983, the US Congress established a public health emergency fund, much like the one for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) uses to rapidly respond to natural disasters. Yet the balance of that federal public health emergency fund, as of June 2, 2016, was a mere $57,000! This sorry situation serves to remind us of, perhaps, the savviest paragraph on public health ever composed; it is one I will quote in 2 parts as this essay progresses. Let’s begin with the opening lines of what ought to be memorized as public health gospel:
“公共卫生是可以购买的”。
当我在初夏的几周写下这些话时,2014年的埃博拉热恐慌早已从我们的集体后脑镜中退去,而寨卡病毒病例的数量,以及越来越多患有寨卡病毒引起的小头畸形的婴儿的发现,正在稳步增加。当你读到这篇专栏的时候,携带病毒的成群埃及伊蚊和白纹伊蚊很可能已经从南美向北、东、西传播,伴随着每次美国流行病所特有的可预见的媒体喧嚣。可悲的是,在21世纪还很年轻的时候,许多具有传染性的危机之间的间歇期以一种全球性的健忘症为特征。随着每种祸害的“扩大免疫曲线”下降,公共卫生官员、民选领导人和广大民众将注意力转向其他问题,而牺牲了对下一个新出现的传染病的规划。正如可以预见的那样,每次新的流行病或流行病的出现都会引发一种局面,即我们的公共卫生官员必须浪费宝贵的时间和精力来确保政府提供足够的资金来抗击和控制新的威胁。具有讽刺意味的是,1983年,美国国会设立了一个公共卫生应急基金,很像联邦紧急事务管理局(FEMA)用来快速应对自然灾害的基金。然而,截至2016年6月2日,联邦公共卫生应急基金的余额仅为57,000美元!这种令人遗憾的情况提醒我们,也许是有史以来关于公共卫生的最明智的一段;我将在接下来的两部分中引用这句话。让我们从应该记住的公共卫生福音的开场白开始:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信