Undergraduate Perceptions of the Three Branches of the Arts and Sciences: An Empirical Study of Both Stated and Revealed Preferences

Q4 Social Sciences
Davis Gammon, Nina Namaste, Alexa Darby, S. Giovanello
{"title":"Undergraduate Perceptions of the Three Branches of the Arts and Sciences: An Empirical Study of Both Stated and Revealed Preferences","authors":"Davis Gammon, Nina Namaste, Alexa Darby, S. Giovanello","doi":"10.5325/jgeneeduc.70.1-2.0111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:Exploration of the breadth of the Arts and Sciences lies at the core of liberal arts education and gets prominently featured in most undergraduate general education programs. The authors of this study investigated student perceptions of the three branches of the Arts and Sciences using cohorts of high-achieving first-year college students enrolled in an innovative 3-week course designed to increase interest, familiarity, and research competency within each of the three branches. Stated and revealed preferences of these students were measured through student surveys and course work. The data often showed a retreat to pre-existing disciplinary preferences, particularly the data on revealed preferences. Students became more familiar with all three branches during the course, but their interest in Arts and Humanities and STEM decreased unless they were majoring in the branch. Also, despite the course's emphasis on crossdisciplinarity, students informally sorted themselves into two groups: STEM students (who avoided Arts and Humanities), and non-STEM students (who avoided STEM). Faculty and administrators of general education programs will therefore need to think carefully about how to structure disciplinary and interdisciplinary coursework, especially when it comes to bridging the perceived divide between the STEM and non-STEM disciplines.","PeriodicalId":39912,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of General Education","volume":"95 1","pages":"111 - 132"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of General Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/jgeneeduc.70.1-2.0111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

abstract:Exploration of the breadth of the Arts and Sciences lies at the core of liberal arts education and gets prominently featured in most undergraduate general education programs. The authors of this study investigated student perceptions of the three branches of the Arts and Sciences using cohorts of high-achieving first-year college students enrolled in an innovative 3-week course designed to increase interest, familiarity, and research competency within each of the three branches. Stated and revealed preferences of these students were measured through student surveys and course work. The data often showed a retreat to pre-existing disciplinary preferences, particularly the data on revealed preferences. Students became more familiar with all three branches during the course, but their interest in Arts and Humanities and STEM decreased unless they were majoring in the branch. Also, despite the course's emphasis on crossdisciplinarity, students informally sorted themselves into two groups: STEM students (who avoided Arts and Humanities), and non-STEM students (who avoided STEM). Faculty and administrators of general education programs will therefore need to think carefully about how to structure disciplinary and interdisciplinary coursework, especially when it comes to bridging the perceived divide between the STEM and non-STEM disciplines.
本科生对艺术和科学三个分支的感知:一项关于陈述偏好和显示偏好的实证研究
探索文科和理科的广度是文科教育的核心,在大多数本科通识教育课程中占有突出地位。本研究的作者调查了学生对艺术和科学三个分支的看法,他们采用了一组成绩优异的大一学生,他们参加了一个为期三周的创新课程,旨在提高对三个分支的兴趣、熟悉程度和研究能力。通过学生调查和课程作业来衡量这些学生陈述和透露的偏好。这些数据经常显示出对先前存在的学科偏好的退缩,特别是关于显示偏好的数据。在课程中,学生们对所有三个分支都更加熟悉,但他们对艺术与人文和STEM的兴趣下降了,除非他们主修该分支。此外,尽管这门课程强调跨学科,但学生们非正式地将自己分为两组:STEM学生(避开艺术和人文学科)和非STEM学生(避开STEM)。因此,通识教育项目的教师和管理者需要仔细考虑如何构建学科和跨学科课程,特别是在弥合STEM和非STEM学科之间的鸿沟方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The Journal of General Education
The Journal of General Education Social Sciences-Education
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信