Children and Law in the Shadows: Legal Ideologies and Personal Strategies in Response to Parental Abductions in Japan

IF 0.4 4区 社会学 0 ASIAN STUDIES
A. Alexy
{"title":"Children and Law in the Shadows: Legal Ideologies and Personal Strategies in Response to Parental Abductions in Japan","authors":"A. Alexy","doi":"10.1215/10679847-8978334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:In contemporary Japan, police and law enforcement are often reluctant to assist in family conflicts. In practice, law enforcement and the family law system offer little assistance for people struggling with family conflicts in particular, following the logic that “law does not belong in families.” This article examines the informal, familial, financial, and social means people use to solve what might be called “family problems” when formal legal assistance is foreclosed. Operating as alternatives to the legal system, these strategies nevertheless are structured directly in response to the formal legal system, what it supports and allows. The article uses theorizations of legal consciousness, law’s “shadows,” and “order without law” to compare strategies and reactions of Japanese citizens and foreigners engaging the legal system in Japan. It argues that the written and unwritten rules surrounding Japanese family law reward those who seek solutions outside of formal channels, thereby co-constructing the legal system as unable to solve family conflicts. Linking individual strategies with outcomes, it concludes that family members who expect less assistance from the formal legal system often end up winning more.","PeriodicalId":44356,"journal":{"name":"Positions-Asia Critique","volume":"35 1","pages":"523 - 549"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Positions-Asia Critique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/10679847-8978334","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:In contemporary Japan, police and law enforcement are often reluctant to assist in family conflicts. In practice, law enforcement and the family law system offer little assistance for people struggling with family conflicts in particular, following the logic that “law does not belong in families.” This article examines the informal, familial, financial, and social means people use to solve what might be called “family problems” when formal legal assistance is foreclosed. Operating as alternatives to the legal system, these strategies nevertheless are structured directly in response to the formal legal system, what it supports and allows. The article uses theorizations of legal consciousness, law’s “shadows,” and “order without law” to compare strategies and reactions of Japanese citizens and foreigners engaging the legal system in Japan. It argues that the written and unwritten rules surrounding Japanese family law reward those who seek solutions outside of formal channels, thereby co-constructing the legal system as unable to solve family conflicts. Linking individual strategies with outcomes, it concludes that family members who expect less assistance from the formal legal system often end up winning more.
阴影中的儿童与法律:日本应对父母诱拐的法律思想与个人策略
摘要:在当代日本,警察和执法部门往往不愿协助处理家庭冲突。在实践中,执法部门和家事法体系遵循“法律不属于家庭”的逻辑,对那些在家庭冲突中挣扎的人提供的帮助尤其少。这篇文章探讨了当正式的法律援助被取消时,人们用来解决所谓的“家庭问题”的非正式的、家庭的、经济的和社会的手段。然而,作为法律制度的替代方案,这些战略的结构直接响应正式法律制度及其支持和允许的内容。本文运用法律意识理论、法律的“阴影”理论和“无法秩序”理论来比较日本公民和外国人参与日本法律制度的策略和反应。它认为,围绕日本家庭法的成文和不成文规则奖励那些在正式渠道之外寻求解决方案的人,从而共同构建了无法解决家庭冲突的法律体系。将个人策略与结果联系起来,得出的结论是,对正式法律体系援助期望较低的家庭成员往往最终赢得更多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Positions-Asia Critique
Positions-Asia Critique ASIAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信