A comparative study of propofol and isoflurane for the maintenance of anesthesia in spine surgery using the bispectral index monitor: a randomized control study

Manisha, Babita, T. Lall, Bhupendra K. Singh, K. Sharma, Rajat Dadhich
{"title":"A comparative study of propofol and isoflurane for the maintenance of anesthesia in spine surgery using the bispectral index monitor: a randomized control study","authors":"Manisha, Babita, T. Lall, Bhupendra K. Singh, K. Sharma, Rajat Dadhich","doi":"10.4103/1687-7934.198249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Early awakening is required in spine surgery to perform neurological examination in the early postoperative period. Bispectral index (BIS) monitoring allows reduction in the total amount of anesthetic drugs and decreases the time for emergence and recovery. Thus, BIS monitor helps in reducing the incidence of awareness. Kinetics of propofol allows both induction and continuous intravenous maintenance of anesthesia with rapid recovery of consciousness that aids in performing neurological examination in the early postoperative period. This study was conducted to compare propofol and isoflurane in the maintenance of anesthesia during spine surgery using the BIS monitor. Patients and methods A total of 50 patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists grades I and II) scheduled for spine surgeries were divided into two groups (25 each). Group A received an infusion of propofol 5 mg/kg/h and group B received isoflurane 1% vol. for maintenance to keep the BIS value between 40 and 60. The groups were compared as regards pulse rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial blood pressure, surgeons’ satisfaction, time to recovery, extubation time, and side effects. Results Both groups were well matched for their demographic data and preoperative vital data. There was no significant difference in hemodynamic parameter between the two groups. The mean recovery time was significantly different (P<0.001) between groups, with earlier recovery in the propofol group (8.14±0.805 min) compared with the isoflurane group (9.06±0.766 min). Values for BIS were similar between the two groups during surgery (P>0.05). Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was 35% lower in group A compared with group B. The quality of surgical field was acceptable in both groups but slightly better in the propofol group. No other major complications were noted in our study. Conclusion Propofol-based anesthesia provides early and better recovery with clear headedness for early neurological assessment for spine surgery.","PeriodicalId":7492,"journal":{"name":"Ain-Shams Journal of Anaesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ain-Shams Journal of Anaesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/1687-7934.198249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background Early awakening is required in spine surgery to perform neurological examination in the early postoperative period. Bispectral index (BIS) monitoring allows reduction in the total amount of anesthetic drugs and decreases the time for emergence and recovery. Thus, BIS monitor helps in reducing the incidence of awareness. Kinetics of propofol allows both induction and continuous intravenous maintenance of anesthesia with rapid recovery of consciousness that aids in performing neurological examination in the early postoperative period. This study was conducted to compare propofol and isoflurane in the maintenance of anesthesia during spine surgery using the BIS monitor. Patients and methods A total of 50 patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists grades I and II) scheduled for spine surgeries were divided into two groups (25 each). Group A received an infusion of propofol 5 mg/kg/h and group B received isoflurane 1% vol. for maintenance to keep the BIS value between 40 and 60. The groups were compared as regards pulse rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial blood pressure, surgeons’ satisfaction, time to recovery, extubation time, and side effects. Results Both groups were well matched for their demographic data and preoperative vital data. There was no significant difference in hemodynamic parameter between the two groups. The mean recovery time was significantly different (P<0.001) between groups, with earlier recovery in the propofol group (8.14±0.805 min) compared with the isoflurane group (9.06±0.766 min). Values for BIS were similar between the two groups during surgery (P>0.05). Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was 35% lower in group A compared with group B. The quality of surgical field was acceptable in both groups but slightly better in the propofol group. No other major complications were noted in our study. Conclusion Propofol-based anesthesia provides early and better recovery with clear headedness for early neurological assessment for spine surgery.
异丙酚和异氟醚在脊柱外科双谱指数监测中维持麻醉的比较研究:一项随机对照研究
背景脊柱外科术后早期进行神经学检查需要早醒。双谱指数(BIS)监测可以减少麻醉药物的总量,减少出现和恢复的时间。因此,BIS监测器有助于减少意识的发生率。异丙酚的动力学可以诱导和持续静脉维持麻醉,并迅速恢复意识,有助于术后早期进行神经学检查。本研究比较了异丙酚和异氟醚在脊柱手术期间使用BIS监护仪维持麻醉的效果。患者和方法将50例拟行脊柱外科手术的患者(美国麻醉医师学会I级和II级)分为两组,每组25例。A组给予异丙酚5 mg/kg/h输注,B组给予异氟烷1%体积维持,使BIS值保持在40 ~ 60之间。比较两组患者的脉搏率、收缩压、舒张压、平均动脉压、外科医生满意度、恢复时间、拔管时间和副作用。结果两组患者的人口学资料和术前生命体征资料吻合良好。两组间血流动力学参数无显著差异。平均恢复时间差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。A组术后恶心呕吐发生率比b组低35%,两组手术野质量均可接受,异丙酚组稍好。本研究未发现其他主要并发症。结论异丙酚麻醉对脊柱外科早期神经学评估有较好的早期恢复和清醒的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信