The Self-Possessed Girl in Golden Age Girls’ Books

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Barnboken Pub Date : 2022-10-06 DOI:10.14811/clr.v45.715
Julie Pfeiffer, Darla Y. Schumm
{"title":"The Self-Possessed Girl in Golden Age Girls’ Books","authors":"Julie Pfeiffer, Darla Y. Schumm","doi":"10.14811/clr.v45.715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the meanings of girls’ silence in three popular late nineteenth-/early twentieth-century novels: Susan Coolidge’s What Katy Did (1872), Johanna Spyri’s Heidis Lehr- und Wanderjahre (Heidi, 1880), and L.M. Montgomery’s Anne of Green Gables (1908). These three classics of girls’ fiction are international bestsellers; all three novels are available in Nordic languages as well as their original English or German. Often read as taming narratives in which wild girls are forcibly shaped into compliant young women, these texts allow us to see how the girls’ book has struggled with conformity and agency since its beginnings. As influential early girls’ books, these novels help us disentangle the patterns early examples of the genre offer us as twenty-first-century readers and critics. Though a girl’s silence can indicate trauma and social repression (as we see in What Katy Did and Heidi), withholding speech can be a voluntary decision that girls make for themselves (as in Anne of Green Gables). In this article, we draw on disability theory to propose a model for thinking about the distinction between silence and silencing. While silence can be a form of repression, paralyzing the thoughts as physical injury paralyzes the body, it is also linked to prayer and the concept of self-possession. Silence is not always a marker of the loss of voice or physical autonomy; by appealing to the idea of self-possession, we can move beyond a dichotomy of speech as positive and silence as negative.","PeriodicalId":52259,"journal":{"name":"Barnboken","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Barnboken","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14811/clr.v45.715","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explores the meanings of girls’ silence in three popular late nineteenth-/early twentieth-century novels: Susan Coolidge’s What Katy Did (1872), Johanna Spyri’s Heidis Lehr- und Wanderjahre (Heidi, 1880), and L.M. Montgomery’s Anne of Green Gables (1908). These three classics of girls’ fiction are international bestsellers; all three novels are available in Nordic languages as well as their original English or German. Often read as taming narratives in which wild girls are forcibly shaped into compliant young women, these texts allow us to see how the girls’ book has struggled with conformity and agency since its beginnings. As influential early girls’ books, these novels help us disentangle the patterns early examples of the genre offer us as twenty-first-century readers and critics. Though a girl’s silence can indicate trauma and social repression (as we see in What Katy Did and Heidi), withholding speech can be a voluntary decision that girls make for themselves (as in Anne of Green Gables). In this article, we draw on disability theory to propose a model for thinking about the distinction between silence and silencing. While silence can be a form of repression, paralyzing the thoughts as physical injury paralyzes the body, it is also linked to prayer and the concept of self-possession. Silence is not always a marker of the loss of voice or physical autonomy; by appealing to the idea of self-possession, we can move beyond a dichotomy of speech as positive and silence as negative.
黄金时代少女书中的沉着女孩
本文探讨了19世纪末20世纪初三部流行小说中女孩沉默的含义:苏珊·柯立芝的《凯蒂做了什么》(1872),约翰娜·斯皮里的《海蒂》(1880)和L.M.蒙哥马利的《绿山墙的安妮》(1908)。这三部经典的少女小说都是国际畅销书;这三部小说除了原版的英语或德语外,还有北欧语言版本。这些文本通常被解读为驯服的叙事,在这些叙事中,狂野的女孩被强行塑造成顺从的年轻女性,这些文本让我们看到了女孩们的书从一开始就在顺从和能动性之间挣扎。作为有影响力的早期女孩书籍,这些小说帮助我们理清了早期类型的例子为我们提供的模式,作为21世纪的读者和评论家。虽然女孩的沉默可能表明创伤和社会压抑(就像我们在《凯蒂做了什么》和《海蒂》中看到的那样),但不说话可能是女孩为自己做出的自愿决定(就像在《绿山墙的安妮》中那样)。在本文中,我们借鉴残疾理论,提出了一个思考沉默与沉默之间区别的模型。虽然沉默可能是一种压抑的形式,使思想瘫痪,就像身体受伤使身体瘫痪一样,但它也与祈祷和自我占有的概念有关。沉默并不总是失去声音或身体自主权的标志;通过求助于自我占有的观念,我们可以超越“说话是积极的,沉默是消极的”的二分法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Barnboken
Barnboken Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信