Contribution of maternal mosaicism to false-positive chromosome X loss associated with noninvasive prenatal testing

Junhui Wan, Ru Li, Fa-tao Li, Qiuxia Yu, Dan Wang, Xiuhong Sun, Yong-ling Zhang, X. Jing, Xuewei Tang, Gui-lan Chen, F. Jiang, Fucheng Li, F. Fu, Yan Li, Lina Zhang, C. Yi, Jian Li, Dongzhi Li, C. Liao
{"title":"Contribution of maternal mosaicism to false-positive chromosome X loss associated with noninvasive prenatal testing","authors":"Junhui Wan, Ru Li, Fa-tao Li, Qiuxia Yu, Dan Wang, Xiuhong Sun, Yong-ling Zhang, X. Jing, Xuewei Tang, Gui-lan Chen, F. Jiang, Fucheng Li, F. Fu, Yan Li, Lina Zhang, C. Yi, Jian Li, Dongzhi Li, C. Liao","doi":"10.1080/14767058.2022.2050362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective To report the frequency of maternal mosaicism contributing to false-positive chromosome X loss associated with noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) at a single center. Methods Pregnancies undergone NIPT using massively parallel sequencing at Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Center between February 2015 and May 2020 were included in this study. Fetal karyotyping, quantitative fluorescence PCR (QF-PCR) or microarray analysis was provided to patients with abnormal sex chromosomal aneuploidy (SCA) results for confirmatory testing, and QF-PCR was also employed to detect maternal sex chromosome status. Results cffDNA testing of 40682 pregnancies revealed 86 cases with NIPT results positive for chromosome X loss (0.21%). Among the 86 high-risk cases, 73 women had undergone confirmatory testing in our center, whereas 13 declined. Of the 73 women verified by invasive prenatal diagnosis, 27.4% (20/73) were true positive cases including six cases of monosomy X, two cases of microdeletion of Xp22.33, one case of deletion Xq27.2q28, one case of 47, XXX and ten cases with fetal sex chromosome mosaicism. Of the remaining 53 patients with fetal normal results, 30 cases had undergone QF-PCR analysis of maternal white blood cells. QF-PCR indicated that 36.7% (11/30) patients had an altered or mosaic maternal sex chromosome status. Statistical analysis indicated that cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) concentration estimated by chromosome X in maternal mosaic cases was significantly higher than that in the non-maternal mosaicism group (p < .05) and was related to maternal mosaicism rate (r = 0.88, p < .05). Conclusions Our findings indicated that maternal mosaicism of sex chromosome was not uncommon in false-positive NIPT chromosome X loss cases. We recommend that this information should be disclosed to pregnancies during clinical counseling and maternal sex chromosome status should be confirmed for the cases with NIPT chromosome X loss.","PeriodicalId":22921,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2022.2050362","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Objective To report the frequency of maternal mosaicism contributing to false-positive chromosome X loss associated with noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) at a single center. Methods Pregnancies undergone NIPT using massively parallel sequencing at Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Center between February 2015 and May 2020 were included in this study. Fetal karyotyping, quantitative fluorescence PCR (QF-PCR) or microarray analysis was provided to patients with abnormal sex chromosomal aneuploidy (SCA) results for confirmatory testing, and QF-PCR was also employed to detect maternal sex chromosome status. Results cffDNA testing of 40682 pregnancies revealed 86 cases with NIPT results positive for chromosome X loss (0.21%). Among the 86 high-risk cases, 73 women had undergone confirmatory testing in our center, whereas 13 declined. Of the 73 women verified by invasive prenatal diagnosis, 27.4% (20/73) were true positive cases including six cases of monosomy X, two cases of microdeletion of Xp22.33, one case of deletion Xq27.2q28, one case of 47, XXX and ten cases with fetal sex chromosome mosaicism. Of the remaining 53 patients with fetal normal results, 30 cases had undergone QF-PCR analysis of maternal white blood cells. QF-PCR indicated that 36.7% (11/30) patients had an altered or mosaic maternal sex chromosome status. Statistical analysis indicated that cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) concentration estimated by chromosome X in maternal mosaic cases was significantly higher than that in the non-maternal mosaicism group (p < .05) and was related to maternal mosaicism rate (r = 0.88, p < .05). Conclusions Our findings indicated that maternal mosaicism of sex chromosome was not uncommon in false-positive NIPT chromosome X loss cases. We recommend that this information should be disclosed to pregnancies during clinical counseling and maternal sex chromosome status should be confirmed for the cases with NIPT chromosome X loss.
与无创产前检测相关的母体嵌合体对假阳性X染色体丢失的贡献
摘要目的报道单中心无创产前检查(NIPT)中母体嵌合体导致X染色体假阳性缺失的频率。方法纳入2015年2月至2020年5月在广州市妇女儿童医疗中心采用大规模平行测序技术进行NIPT的孕妇。对性染色体非整倍体(SCA)结果异常的患者进行胎儿核型、定量荧光PCR (QF-PCR)或微阵列分析进行确证检测,并采用QF-PCR检测母体性染色体状态。结果对40682例妊娠进行cffDNA检测,NIPT结果为X染色体缺失阳性86例(0.21%)。86例高危病例中,73例在本中心接受了确诊性检测,13例谢绝。有创产前诊断证实的73例产妇中,真阳性占27.4%(20/73),其中X染色体单体6例,Xp22.33微缺失2例,Xq27.2q28缺失1例,47、XXX缺失1例,胎儿性染色体嵌合体10例。在其余53例胎儿结果正常的患者中,30例对母体白细胞进行了QF-PCR分析。QF-PCR结果显示,36.7%(11/30)的患者存在母体性染色体改变或嵌合状态。统计分析表明,母体镶嵌组X染色体测定的游离胎儿DNA (cffDNA)浓度显著高于非母体镶嵌组(p < 0.05),并与母体镶嵌率相关(r = 0.88, p < 0.05)。结论在假阳性的NIPT X染色体缺失病例中,母体性染色体嵌合现象并不少见。我们建议在临床咨询时向孕妇透露这些信息,并对NIPT X染色体丢失的病例确认母体性染色体状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信