Antibiotic resistance rates among bacterial isolates from infected patients of intensive care unit over the period (2011-2016) in Bursa, Turkey

Sanem Karadag Gecgel, Necmiye Demircan
{"title":"Antibiotic resistance rates among bacterial isolates from infected patients of intensive care unit over the period (2011-2016) in Bursa, Turkey","authors":"Sanem Karadag Gecgel, Necmiye Demircan","doi":"10.3823/0809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The aims of this study were to evaluate the microbiological data for effective infection control and specific antimicrobial stewardship, and to report the epidemiology of intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired infections and the local antimicrobial resistance of pathogens Methods: Data were collected between January 2011 and October 2016 from the cardiology and cardiovascular surgery patients. The identification and antimicrobial susceptibility analyses of clinical pathogenic isolates were determined by the automatic device system. Results: Klebsiella pneumoniae was detected increasingly and significantly (p=0.048) resistant to imipenem (IMP). Acinetobacter baumanii was found increasingly and significantly (p=0.045, p=0.030, p=0.006, p=0.027) resistant to amikacin (AN), gentamicin (GN), trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole (SXT) and tetracycline (TE), respectively. There was a significantly decrease in the resistant rates of IMP, piperacillin-tazobactam (TPZ), meropenem (MEM) and ciprofloxacin (CIP) for Pseudomonas spp. (p=0.048). All gram-negative bacteria isolates showed significantly increasing resistance rates to cefepime (CEP) (p=0.015). Also, all gram-positive bacteria demonstrated significantly decreasing resistance rates to teicoplanin (TEC) (p=0.034). Conclusion: This study suggets that inadequacy of infection control measures such as hand hygiene and patient isolation may have contributed to increasing the rates of carbapenem-resistant K. pnemoniae (CR-KP) isolates in recent years. Antibiotic resistance rates among bacterial isolates from infected patients of intensive care unit over the period (2011-2016) in Bursa, Turkey Sanem Karadag Gecgel1, Necmiye Demircan2 1 Departments of Microbiology and Clinical Microbiology, University of Health Sciences, Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital, Bursa, Turkey. 2 Departments of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, University of Health Sciences, Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital, Bursa, Turkey. Contact information: Sanem Karadag Gecgel.  sanemkaradag@yahoo.com","PeriodicalId":22518,"journal":{"name":"The International Arabic Journal of Antimicrobial Agents","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Arabic Journal of Antimicrobial Agents","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3823/0809","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The aims of this study were to evaluate the microbiological data for effective infection control and specific antimicrobial stewardship, and to report the epidemiology of intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired infections and the local antimicrobial resistance of pathogens Methods: Data were collected between January 2011 and October 2016 from the cardiology and cardiovascular surgery patients. The identification and antimicrobial susceptibility analyses of clinical pathogenic isolates were determined by the automatic device system. Results: Klebsiella pneumoniae was detected increasingly and significantly (p=0.048) resistant to imipenem (IMP). Acinetobacter baumanii was found increasingly and significantly (p=0.045, p=0.030, p=0.006, p=0.027) resistant to amikacin (AN), gentamicin (GN), trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole (SXT) and tetracycline (TE), respectively. There was a significantly decrease in the resistant rates of IMP, piperacillin-tazobactam (TPZ), meropenem (MEM) and ciprofloxacin (CIP) for Pseudomonas spp. (p=0.048). All gram-negative bacteria isolates showed significantly increasing resistance rates to cefepime (CEP) (p=0.015). Also, all gram-positive bacteria demonstrated significantly decreasing resistance rates to teicoplanin (TEC) (p=0.034). Conclusion: This study suggets that inadequacy of infection control measures such as hand hygiene and patient isolation may have contributed to increasing the rates of carbapenem-resistant K. pnemoniae (CR-KP) isolates in recent years. Antibiotic resistance rates among bacterial isolates from infected patients of intensive care unit over the period (2011-2016) in Bursa, Turkey Sanem Karadag Gecgel1, Necmiye Demircan2 1 Departments of Microbiology and Clinical Microbiology, University of Health Sciences, Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital, Bursa, Turkey. 2 Departments of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, University of Health Sciences, Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital, Bursa, Turkey. Contact information: Sanem Karadag Gecgel.  sanemkaradag@yahoo.com
2011-2016年期间土耳其布尔萨重症监护病房感染患者分离细菌的抗生素耐药率
背景:本研究的目的是评估微生物学数据,为有效的感染控制和特异性抗菌药物管理提供依据,并报告重症监护病房(ICU)获得性感染的流行病学和病原菌的局部耐药情况。方法:收集2011年1月至2016年10月心内科和心血管外科患者的数据。临床病原菌鉴定及药敏分析采用自动装置系统进行。结果:肺炎克雷伯菌对亚胺培南(IMP)耐药呈明显上升趋势(p=0.048)。鲍曼不动杆菌对阿米卡星(AN)、庆大霉素(GN)、甲氧基磺胺甲恶唑(SXT)和四环素(TE)的耐药呈显著性增加趋势(p=0.045, p=0.030, p=0.006, p=0.027)。假单胞菌对IMP、哌拉西林-他唑巴坦(TPZ)、美罗培南(MEM)和环丙沙星(CIP)的耐药率显著降低(p=0.048)。革兰氏阴性菌对头孢吡肟(CEP)的耐药率均显著升高(p=0.015)。所有革兰氏阳性菌对替柯planin (TEC)的耐药率均显著降低(p=0.034)。结论:本研究提示,近年来,手卫生和患者隔离等感染控制措施的不足可能是导致耐碳青霉烯肺炎克雷伯菌(CR-KP)分离株感染率上升的原因。2011-2016年期间土耳其布尔萨重症监护病房感染患者分离细菌的抗生素耐药率分析Sanem Karadag Gecgel1, Necmiye Demircan2 1土耳其布尔萨Yuksek Ihtisas培训和研究医院卫生科学大学微生物学和临床微生物学系2土耳其布尔萨Yuksek Ihtisas培训和研究医院卫生科学大学传染病和临床微生物学系联系方式:Sanem Karadag Gecgel。sanemkaradag@yahoo.com
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信