Management of Baseline Measurements in Statistical Analysis of 2×2 Crossover Trials

S. Momenyan, H. Majd
{"title":"Management of Baseline Measurements in Statistical Analysis of 2×2 Crossover Trials","authors":"S. Momenyan, H. Majd","doi":"10.22037/jps.v10i1.16352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction : Crossover designs have applications in a wide range of sciences. The simplest and most common of such designs are the two-period, two-treatment (2×2) crossover. As a consequence, each subject provides a 4×1 vector of responses for data analysis in the following chronological order: baseline (period 1), post-baseline (period 1), baseline (period 2), and post-baseline (period 2). Methods : We considered three types of analytic approaches for handling the baselines:1) analysis of variance (ANOVA) method which ignores the first or both period baselines or use a change from baseline analysis 2) analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) method which uses an analysis of covariance where linear functions of one or both baselines are employed as either period-specific or period-invariant covariates 3) Joint modeling method that conducts joint modeling of a linear function of the baseline and post-baseline responses with certain mean constraints for the baseline responses. The crossover clinical trial data was analyzed, using the proposed models.  Results : Based on the results on real data among all mentioned models, the first model (direct comparison of post-treatment values) and the second model (post-treatment measurement subtracts corresponding baseline) had the lowest and the highest standard errors, respectively. With respect to Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), the fifth model (comparison of post-treatment values adjusted by all available baseline data) and the eighth model (comparison of post-treatment values adjusted by difference and sum of all available baseline data) had the lowest magnitude, and the ninth model (modeling period baseline jointly with post-treatment values) had the highest AIC for both variables which the values of AIC were 518.1, 520.9 and 1137.8, respectively. Conclusion: To sum up, it is found that baseline data of crossover trial may be used to improve the efficiency of treatment effect estimation when applied appropriately.","PeriodicalId":16663,"journal":{"name":"Journal of paramedical sciences","volume":"33 1","pages":"13-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of paramedical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22037/jps.v10i1.16352","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction : Crossover designs have applications in a wide range of sciences. The simplest and most common of such designs are the two-period, two-treatment (2×2) crossover. As a consequence, each subject provides a 4×1 vector of responses for data analysis in the following chronological order: baseline (period 1), post-baseline (period 1), baseline (period 2), and post-baseline (period 2). Methods : We considered three types of analytic approaches for handling the baselines:1) analysis of variance (ANOVA) method which ignores the first or both period baselines or use a change from baseline analysis 2) analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) method which uses an analysis of covariance where linear functions of one or both baselines are employed as either period-specific or period-invariant covariates 3) Joint modeling method that conducts joint modeling of a linear function of the baseline and post-baseline responses with certain mean constraints for the baseline responses. The crossover clinical trial data was analyzed, using the proposed models.  Results : Based on the results on real data among all mentioned models, the first model (direct comparison of post-treatment values) and the second model (post-treatment measurement subtracts corresponding baseline) had the lowest and the highest standard errors, respectively. With respect to Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), the fifth model (comparison of post-treatment values adjusted by all available baseline data) and the eighth model (comparison of post-treatment values adjusted by difference and sum of all available baseline data) had the lowest magnitude, and the ninth model (modeling period baseline jointly with post-treatment values) had the highest AIC for both variables which the values of AIC were 518.1, 520.9 and 1137.8, respectively. Conclusion: To sum up, it is found that baseline data of crossover trial may be used to improve the efficiency of treatment effect estimation when applied appropriately.
2×2交叉试验统计分析中基线测量的管理
简介:交叉设计在许多科学领域都有广泛的应用。这种设计中最简单和最常见的是两周期,两处理(2×2)交叉。因此,每个受试者按照以下时间顺序为数据分析提供了4×1响应向量:基线(第1期)、基线后(第1期)、基线后(第2期)和基线后(第2期)。我们考虑了三种处理基线的分析方法:1)方差分析(ANOVA)方法,它忽略了第一个或两个时期的基线,或使用基线变化分析;2)协方差分析(ANCOVA)方法,它使用协方差分析,其中一个或两个基线的线性函数被用作特定时期或周期不变的协变量;3)联合建模方法,对基线的线性函数进行联合建模基线后反应,对基线反应有一定的平均约束。使用提出的模型对交叉临床试验数据进行分析。结果:从实际数据的结果来看,第一种模型(直接比较处理后的值)和第二种模型(处理后的测量减去相应的基线)的标准误差最小,最高。在赤池信息准则(Akaike Information Criterion, AIC)方面,第5个模型(经所有可用基线数据调整后的处理后值的比较)和第8个模型(经所有可用基线数据的差值和调整后值的比较)的幅度最小,第9个模型(建模期基线与处理后值联合)的AIC值最高,分别为518.1、520.9和1137.8。结论:综上所述,交叉试验的基线数据如果应用得当,可以提高治疗效果估计的效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信