M. Elagra, H. Alzaid, Mai Alsabeh, Nada Altoub, Sahar Binhowaimel
{"title":"Caries-related treatment decisions of general dental practitioners in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia","authors":"M. Elagra, H. Alzaid, Mai Alsabeh, Nada Altoub, Sahar Binhowaimel","doi":"10.4103/sjos.sjoralsci_63_19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: For decades, caries management strategies followed G. V. Black's concept, which has been considered an invasive approach since the development of operative care. Several studies showed a wide variation in restorative treatment decisions even among dentists within the same country. Aim: The aim of this study is to investigate treatment decisions for carious lesions in relation to the patients' caries risk among general practitioners. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study using a self-administered paper-based questionnaire was conducted among general dental practitioners in Riyadh city. The demographic characteristics of the practitioners were obtained. The questionnaire included five clinical scenarios aided by photographs; each scenario involved either a high- or a low-caries risk condition, and the scenarios were presented alternately. The recall interval was recorded. Occlusal and proximal caries thresholds were also explored. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 21 software. Chi-square and logistic regression analyses were conducted, and values of P ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: A total of 340 participants were included in the analysis. The treatment decisions of the general dental practitioners for the International Caries Detection and Assessment System code 2 scenarios were mostly preventive. Proximal carious lesions extending to the dentinoenamel junction were the principal indication for operative treatment. Most participants preferred to recall patients after 6 months. Conclusion: There was vast discordance between knowledge and practice in restorative treatment decisions for occlusal carious lesions. The general dentists tended to opt for restorative treatment in high-risk patients three times more often than in low-risk patients. Clinical Significance: A low level of clinical implementation of evidence-based information was observed in this study regarding occlusal caries.","PeriodicalId":32335,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Journal of Oral Sciences","volume":"31 1","pages":"174 - 180"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Journal of Oral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sjos.sjoralsci_63_19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Introduction: For decades, caries management strategies followed G. V. Black's concept, which has been considered an invasive approach since the development of operative care. Several studies showed a wide variation in restorative treatment decisions even among dentists within the same country. Aim: The aim of this study is to investigate treatment decisions for carious lesions in relation to the patients' caries risk among general practitioners. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study using a self-administered paper-based questionnaire was conducted among general dental practitioners in Riyadh city. The demographic characteristics of the practitioners were obtained. The questionnaire included five clinical scenarios aided by photographs; each scenario involved either a high- or a low-caries risk condition, and the scenarios were presented alternately. The recall interval was recorded. Occlusal and proximal caries thresholds were also explored. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 21 software. Chi-square and logistic regression analyses were conducted, and values of P ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: A total of 340 participants were included in the analysis. The treatment decisions of the general dental practitioners for the International Caries Detection and Assessment System code 2 scenarios were mostly preventive. Proximal carious lesions extending to the dentinoenamel junction were the principal indication for operative treatment. Most participants preferred to recall patients after 6 months. Conclusion: There was vast discordance between knowledge and practice in restorative treatment decisions for occlusal carious lesions. The general dentists tended to opt for restorative treatment in high-risk patients three times more often than in low-risk patients. Clinical Significance: A low level of clinical implementation of evidence-based information was observed in this study regarding occlusal caries.
导论:几十年来,龋齿管理策略遵循G. V. Black的概念,自手术护理发展以来,该概念一直被认为是一种侵入性方法。几项研究表明,即使在同一个国家的牙医之间,在修复治疗决策上也存在很大差异。目的:本研究的目的是调查全科医生对龋齿病变的治疗决策与患者龋齿风险的关系。材料和方法:在利雅得市的普通牙科医生中进行了一项横断面研究,使用自我管理的纸质问卷。获得了从业人员的人口学特征。问卷包括五个临床场景,并辅以照片;每个场景包括高或低龋风险条件,并且场景交替呈现。记录召回间隔。还探讨了咬合和近端龋阈值。数据分析采用SPSS 21版软件。进行卡方回归和逻辑回归分析,P≤0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果:共有340名参与者被纳入分析。全科牙医在国际龋齿检测和评估系统代码2情景下的治疗决策大多是预防性的。近端龋齿损害延伸到牙本质-牙釉质交界处是手术治疗的主要指征。大多数参与者倾向于在6个月后回忆患者。结论:牙合龋齿的修复治疗决策存在着知识与实践的巨大差异。一般牙医倾向于选择恢复性治疗的高危患者比低危患者三倍多。临床意义:在本研究中观察到关于牙合龋齿的循证信息的临床执行水平较低。