How pronounced is the U-curve? Revisiting income inequality in the United States, 1917-1960

Vincent J. Geloso, Phillip W. Magness, J. Moore, Philip Schlosser
{"title":"How pronounced is the U-curve? Revisiting income inequality in the United States, 1917-1960","authors":"Vincent J. Geloso, Phillip W. Magness, J. Moore, Philip Schlosser","doi":"10.1093/ej/ueac020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Piketty and Saez (2003) found a pronounced U-curve pattern of American income inequality since 1917, displaying a precipitous decline during World War II to a level that would hold until 1980. We offer revisions to their income inequality estimates prior to 1960 with three important findings. First, Piketty and Saez overstate inequality levels in this period. Second, the decline during WWII was smaller than depicted. Third, the Great Depression, rather than WWII, played the more significant role. These findings indicate a need to reevaluate commonly held assumptions about the evolution of inequality during the period of the ‘Great Leveling,’ as well as the nature of its posited relationship to tax policy.","PeriodicalId":85686,"journal":{"name":"The Economic journal of Nepal","volume":"72 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Economic journal of Nepal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/ueac020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Piketty and Saez (2003) found a pronounced U-curve pattern of American income inequality since 1917, displaying a precipitous decline during World War II to a level that would hold until 1980. We offer revisions to their income inequality estimates prior to 1960 with three important findings. First, Piketty and Saez overstate inequality levels in this period. Second, the decline during WWII was smaller than depicted. Third, the Great Depression, rather than WWII, played the more significant role. These findings indicate a need to reevaluate commonly held assumptions about the evolution of inequality during the period of the ‘Great Leveling,’ as well as the nature of its posited relationship to tax policy.
u型曲线有多明显?重新审视1917-1960年美国的收入不平等
Piketty和Saez(2003)发现,自1917年以来,美国的收入不平等呈现出明显的u型曲线模式,二战期间收入不平等急剧下降,并一直持续到1980年。我们对1960年之前的收入不平等估计进行了修正,并得出了三个重要发现。首先,皮凯蒂和赛斯夸大了这一时期的不平等程度。其次,二战期间的下降比描述的要小。第三,大萧条比二战发挥了更大的作用。这些发现表明,有必要重新评估关于“大均衡”时期不平等演变的普遍假设,以及它与税收政策之间假定关系的本质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信