Global assessment of internal audit competence: Does one size fit all?

IF 0.3 Q3 LAW
Philna Coetzee, L. Erasmus, K. Plant
{"title":"Global assessment of internal audit competence: Does one size fit all?","authors":"Philna Coetzee, L. Erasmus, K. Plant","doi":"10.25159/1998-8125/5802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Certified Internal Auditor (CIA) programme is the formal globally recognised test of competence for internal auditors. However, the question is raised whether this assessment of competence has kept up with the changing demands of modern internal auditing, taking into account the fact that demands may differ from one country or region to the next. The fact that Australia, the UK & Ireland and South Africa require qualifications in addition to those of the CIA programme may be attributed to a need for a different level of competence in comparison with the Rest of the World. The objective of the study was to determine whether differences exist between the respective competency level needs for internal auditors from South Africa, the UK and Ireland, Australia and the Rest of the World. Data from the Institute of Internal Auditors’ (IIA’s) latest global Common Body of Knowledge (CBOK) study was used to determine and statistically analyse the perceived levels of importance of general competencies, technical skills and behavioural skills needed by internal auditors. The results indicated that globally internal auditors have similar perceptions of what competencies are most important for internal auditors, but the levels of importance differ among the regions. South Africa demanded a higher level of competence and aligned closely with the UK and Ireland, which could explain why South Africa now needs a customised competency assessment. Australia consistently indicated different perceptions of the levels of importance of competencies, which could explain Australia’s need for a country-specific internal audit competency assessment. Hence one size may not fit all.","PeriodicalId":44582,"journal":{"name":"Southern African Business Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern African Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25159/1998-8125/5802","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The Certified Internal Auditor (CIA) programme is the formal globally recognised test of competence for internal auditors. However, the question is raised whether this assessment of competence has kept up with the changing demands of modern internal auditing, taking into account the fact that demands may differ from one country or region to the next. The fact that Australia, the UK & Ireland and South Africa require qualifications in addition to those of the CIA programme may be attributed to a need for a different level of competence in comparison with the Rest of the World. The objective of the study was to determine whether differences exist between the respective competency level needs for internal auditors from South Africa, the UK and Ireland, Australia and the Rest of the World. Data from the Institute of Internal Auditors’ (IIA’s) latest global Common Body of Knowledge (CBOK) study was used to determine and statistically analyse the perceived levels of importance of general competencies, technical skills and behavioural skills needed by internal auditors. The results indicated that globally internal auditors have similar perceptions of what competencies are most important for internal auditors, but the levels of importance differ among the regions. South Africa demanded a higher level of competence and aligned closely with the UK and Ireland, which could explain why South Africa now needs a customised competency assessment. Australia consistently indicated different perceptions of the levels of importance of competencies, which could explain Australia’s need for a country-specific internal audit competency assessment. Hence one size may not fit all.
内部审计能力的全球评估:一个标准适用于所有吗?
注册内部审计师(CIA)计划是正式的全球认可的内部审计师能力测试。但是,考虑到不同国家或区域的要求可能不同,提出的问题是,这种能力评价是否跟上了现代内部审计不断变化的要求。事实上,澳大利亚、英国、爱尔兰和南非除了CIA项目之外,还要求资格证书,这可能是因为与世界其他地区相比,他们需要不同水平的能力。该研究的目的是确定南非、英国和爱尔兰、澳大利亚和世界其他地区的内部审计师各自的能力水平需求之间是否存在差异。来自内部审计师协会(IIA)最新的全球共同知识体系(CBOK)研究的数据用于确定和统计分析内部审计师所需的一般能力、技术技能和行为技能的感知重要性水平。结果表明,全球内部审计师对什么能力是最重要的内部审计师有相似的看法,但重要性的水平在区域之间有所不同。南非要求更高水平的能力,并与英国和爱尔兰密切合作,这可以解释为什么南非现在需要一个定制的能力评估。澳大利亚一贯表示对能力重要性程度的不同看法,这可以解释澳大利亚需要针对具体国家进行内部审计能力评估的原因。因此,一种方式可能不适合所有人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信