A nemzetállam történelmi és imaginárius alternatíváinak eltűnése

Botond Szemes, Gergő Melhardt
{"title":"A nemzetállam történelmi és imaginárius alternatíváinak eltűnése","authors":"Botond Szemes, Gergő Melhardt","doi":"10.57227/liter.2023.1.1.","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper approaches the last forty-fifty years of Hungarian prose from a politico-historical and narratological point of view, combining (1) readings of individual pieces of fiction, (2) interpretations of long-term processes in literary production and (3) computerized readings using methods of Digital Humanities on a corpus of 46 volumes. As a starting point the authors identify the so-called ’Pannonian prose’ of Miklós Mészöly in a context of intellectual history regarding the discourse on the notion of Central (or Eastern) Europe in the 1980–90s. The paper then follows the trace of this highly influential Mészöly corpus first in the most canonised works of fiction between the 1980s and 2010, then in the most acclaimed novels and short story collections between 2010 and 2020. Style changes convey shifts in social, political and historical notions of the works, which are thus also interpreted as a slow process: from Central (Eastern) European regional thought to questions of national history and identity, then to family history and identity, later to the life and problems of individual persons. After showing how this process went on in recent Hungarian literature, the paper tries to answer why it happened, drawing some cautious conclusions on the dialectics of inclusiveness—closedness and Western cultural and political influences on Hungarian culture.","PeriodicalId":81044,"journal":{"name":"Cuadernos universitarios. Departamento de Literatura","volume":"120 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cuadernos universitarios. Departamento de Literatura","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57227/liter.2023.1.1.","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper approaches the last forty-fifty years of Hungarian prose from a politico-historical and narratological point of view, combining (1) readings of individual pieces of fiction, (2) interpretations of long-term processes in literary production and (3) computerized readings using methods of Digital Humanities on a corpus of 46 volumes. As a starting point the authors identify the so-called ’Pannonian prose’ of Miklós Mészöly in a context of intellectual history regarding the discourse on the notion of Central (or Eastern) Europe in the 1980–90s. The paper then follows the trace of this highly influential Mészöly corpus first in the most canonised works of fiction between the 1980s and 2010, then in the most acclaimed novels and short story collections between 2010 and 2020. Style changes convey shifts in social, political and historical notions of the works, which are thus also interpreted as a slow process: from Central (Eastern) European regional thought to questions of national history and identity, then to family history and identity, later to the life and problems of individual persons. After showing how this process went on in recent Hungarian literature, the paper tries to answer why it happened, drawing some cautious conclusions on the dialectics of inclusiveness—closedness and Western cultural and political influences on Hungarian culture.
本文从政治历史和叙事学的角度出发,结合(1)对个别小说作品的阅读,(2)对文学生产长期过程的解释,以及(3)使用数字人文学科方法对46卷语料库进行计算机化阅读,研究了匈牙利散文的最后四十年。作为起点,作者在关于1980 - 90年代中欧(或东欧)概念的话语的思想史背景下确定了Miklós Mészöly的所谓“潘诺尼亚散文”。然后,本文沿着这个极具影响力的Mészöly语料库的轨迹,首先在20世纪80年代至2010年期间最受推崇的小说作品中,然后在2010年至2020年期间最受欢迎的小说和短篇小说集中。风格的变化传达了作品的社会、政治和历史观念的转变,因此也被解释为一个缓慢的过程:从中欧(东欧)地区思想到国家历史和身份的问题,然后到家族史和身份,后来到个人的生活和问题。在展示了这一过程是如何在最近的匈牙利文学中发生的之后,本文试图回答为什么会发生,并就包容性-封闭性的辩证法以及西方文化和政治对匈牙利文化的影响得出了一些谨慎的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信