Mediation, Lawyers and Special Educational Needs: Ensuring a Balanced Approach to Dispute Resolution

N. Harris
{"title":"Mediation, Lawyers and Special Educational Needs: Ensuring a Balanced Approach to Dispute Resolution","authors":"N. Harris","doi":"10.1080/09615768.2021.1953815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mediation is intended to provide a less formal and more collaborative forum for dispute resolution than a court or tribunal and one in which the parties themselves can actively participate in reaching a settlement. There is an assumption that, guided by a skilled mediator, they can do so without lawyer assistance. Indeed, the presence of lawyers tends to be discouraged, deemed not conducive to the informality and the non-adversarial character of mediation. Yet in a mediation there is often an imbalance of power and inequality of arms and fundamental rights can be at issue. One such area is special educational needs (SEN), applicable to nearly 1.5 million children in England, a field where disputes between families and local authorities are common. This article examines the case for and against lawyer involvement in mediations of this kind and considers what might be the most appropriate model of such involvement.","PeriodicalId":88025,"journal":{"name":"King's law journal : KLJ","volume":"85 1","pages":"414 - 436"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"King's law journal : KLJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09615768.2021.1953815","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Mediation is intended to provide a less formal and more collaborative forum for dispute resolution than a court or tribunal and one in which the parties themselves can actively participate in reaching a settlement. There is an assumption that, guided by a skilled mediator, they can do so without lawyer assistance. Indeed, the presence of lawyers tends to be discouraged, deemed not conducive to the informality and the non-adversarial character of mediation. Yet in a mediation there is often an imbalance of power and inequality of arms and fundamental rights can be at issue. One such area is special educational needs (SEN), applicable to nearly 1.5 million children in England, a field where disputes between families and local authorities are common. This article examines the case for and against lawyer involvement in mediations of this kind and considers what might be the most appropriate model of such involvement.
调解、律师和特殊教育需要:确保解决争议的平衡方法
调解的目的是为解决争端提供一个比法院或法庭不那么正式和更具合作性的论坛,并使当事方自己能够积极参与达成解决办法。有一种假设是,在一个熟练的调解员的指导下,他们可以在没有律师帮助的情况下做到这一点。事实上,律师的存在往往不被鼓励,被认为不利于调解的非正式性和非对抗性。然而,在调解中往往会出现权力不平衡、武器不平等和基本权利不平等的问题。其中一个领域是特殊教育需求(SEN),适用于英国近150万儿童,这是家庭和地方当局之间经常发生纠纷的领域。本文考察了支持和反对律师参与这种调解的案例,并考虑了这种参与的最合适的模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信