Ethical and Social Issues in Medicine

DeckerMed Medicine Pub Date : 2019-04-03 DOI:10.2310/im.1222
R. Loewy, E. Loewy, Faith T. Fitzgerald
{"title":"Ethical and Social Issues in Medicine","authors":"R. Loewy, E. Loewy, Faith T. Fitzgerald","doi":"10.2310/im.1222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"So rapidly has the field of health care ethics continued to grow that, when recently “googled,” the term produced 28.2 million hits. The challenge is to address the ethical and social issues in medicine in this very limited article space. It remains an impossible task to present more than a superficial discussion of these complex issues and the complicated cases in which they are to be found. Like good medicine, good ethics cannot be practiced by algorithm. The authors have opted to provide an operational guide to help clinicians sort through the ethical and social quandaries they must face on a daily basis. To that end, the authors have chosen to divide this chapter into the following sections: 1. A brief description of the biopsychosocial nature of ethics and how it differs from personal morality 2. A method for identifying and dealing with ethical issues 3. A discussion of the role of bioethicists and ethics committees 4. The professional fiduciary role of clinicians 5. Listings of some of the common key bioethical and legal terms (online access only) 6. A very brief discussion of the terms cited in the above listings (online access only)\nThis reviews contains 4 tables, 8 references, 1 appendix, and 20 additional readings.\nKeywords: Ethical, social, right, wrong, good, bad, obligation, moral authority, critically reflective, and multiperspectival activity, Curiosity, Honesty, Patience, Open-mindedness","PeriodicalId":11220,"journal":{"name":"DeckerMed Medicine","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DeckerMed Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2310/im.1222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

So rapidly has the field of health care ethics continued to grow that, when recently “googled,” the term produced 28.2 million hits. The challenge is to address the ethical and social issues in medicine in this very limited article space. It remains an impossible task to present more than a superficial discussion of these complex issues and the complicated cases in which they are to be found. Like good medicine, good ethics cannot be practiced by algorithm. The authors have opted to provide an operational guide to help clinicians sort through the ethical and social quandaries they must face on a daily basis. To that end, the authors have chosen to divide this chapter into the following sections: 1. A brief description of the biopsychosocial nature of ethics and how it differs from personal morality 2. A method for identifying and dealing with ethical issues 3. A discussion of the role of bioethicists and ethics committees 4. The professional fiduciary role of clinicians 5. Listings of some of the common key bioethical and legal terms (online access only) 6. A very brief discussion of the terms cited in the above listings (online access only) This reviews contains 4 tables, 8 references, 1 appendix, and 20 additional readings. Keywords: Ethical, social, right, wrong, good, bad, obligation, moral authority, critically reflective, and multiperspectival activity, Curiosity, Honesty, Patience, Open-mindedness
医学中的伦理和社会问题
医疗保健伦理领域的发展如此之快,以至于最近在谷歌上搜索时,这个词产生了2820万次点击。挑战在于如何在这篇非常有限的文章中解决医学中的伦理和社会问题。要对这些复杂的问题和可能出现这些问题的复杂案例进行肤浅的讨论,仍然是一项不可能完成的任务。就像好的药物一样,好的伦理不能通过算法来实现。作者选择提供一个操作指南,帮助临床医生梳理他们每天必须面对的伦理和社会困境。为此,作者选择将本章分为以下几节:伦理的生物心理社会性质及其与个人道德的区别识别和处理道德问题的方法。生物伦理学家和伦理委员会作用的讨论临床医生的专业受托人角色一些常见的关键生物伦理和法律术语的列表(仅限在线访问)对上述列表中引用的术语进行了非常简短的讨论(仅限在线访问)。这篇综述包含4个表格,8个参考文献,1个附录和20个附加阅读材料。关键词:伦理,社会,对,错,好,坏,义务,道德权威,批判性反思,多视角活动,好奇心,诚实,耐心,开放思想
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信