Effect of statistical uncertainty on Monaco Monte-Carlo dose calculation

Seema Sharma, S. Chander, Subramani Velliyan, S. Bhaskar, S. Pathy, Pratik Kumar, G. Natanasabapathi, S. Thulkar
{"title":"Effect of statistical uncertainty on Monaco Monte-Carlo dose calculation","authors":"Seema Sharma, S. Chander, Subramani Velliyan, S. Bhaskar, S. Pathy, Pratik Kumar, G. Natanasabapathi, S. Thulkar","doi":"10.14319/IJCTO.61.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The aim of this study is to evaluate influence of statistical uncertainty on Monte-Carlo dose calculation of Monaco 5.11 treatment planning system (TPS). Methods: Phantom with contoured C-Shape structure set was downloaded from AAPM website provided with TG119 report. VMAT plan was created for C-Shape test case using Monaco TPS for 6 MV Elekta Versa-HD linear-accelerator. Dose prescription and constraints were as per TG119. After optimizations, C-Shape plan was calculated with different statistical-uncertainty (i) 0.5%, 1.0%, 3.0% and 5.0% per control point and (ii) 0.5%, 1.0%, 3.0% and 5.0% per calculation. Base plan was calculated with 0.5% per control point. Results: Variations in PTV doses for different statistical-uncertainties with respect to 0.5% per control point were within PTV-D95: 82 cGy(1.64%); PTV-D10: 14.8 cGy(0.28%); Core-D10: 3.7 cGy(0.15%). MU required to deliver a plan (920 MU) were observed same with different statistical-uncertainty. Calculation time increases with decrease in statistical-uncertainty due to more number of histories. 2D-Gamma pass rate was ranging from 98.1% to 98.9% for analyzed statistical-uncertainties. Statistical-uncertainty 0.5% per control point showed higher Gamma pass-rate (98.9%). Conclusion: Minor variation (<1.64%) in dose volume parameters was observed with different statistical-uncertainties, whereas Monitor unit remain same. 3.0% per control point and 0.5% per calculation resulted in almost similar results and found optimal with reasonable calculation time in terms of plan quality and delivery accuracy (gamma pass-rate).","PeriodicalId":13931,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cancer Therapy and Oncology","volume":"71 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cancer Therapy and Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14319/IJCTO.61.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study is to evaluate influence of statistical uncertainty on Monte-Carlo dose calculation of Monaco 5.11 treatment planning system (TPS). Methods: Phantom with contoured C-Shape structure set was downloaded from AAPM website provided with TG119 report. VMAT plan was created for C-Shape test case using Monaco TPS for 6 MV Elekta Versa-HD linear-accelerator. Dose prescription and constraints were as per TG119. After optimizations, C-Shape plan was calculated with different statistical-uncertainty (i) 0.5%, 1.0%, 3.0% and 5.0% per control point and (ii) 0.5%, 1.0%, 3.0% and 5.0% per calculation. Base plan was calculated with 0.5% per control point. Results: Variations in PTV doses for different statistical-uncertainties with respect to 0.5% per control point were within PTV-D95: 82 cGy(1.64%); PTV-D10: 14.8 cGy(0.28%); Core-D10: 3.7 cGy(0.15%). MU required to deliver a plan (920 MU) were observed same with different statistical-uncertainty. Calculation time increases with decrease in statistical-uncertainty due to more number of histories. 2D-Gamma pass rate was ranging from 98.1% to 98.9% for analyzed statistical-uncertainties. Statistical-uncertainty 0.5% per control point showed higher Gamma pass-rate (98.9%). Conclusion: Minor variation (<1.64%) in dose volume parameters was observed with different statistical-uncertainties, whereas Monitor unit remain same. 3.0% per control point and 0.5% per calculation resulted in almost similar results and found optimal with reasonable calculation time in terms of plan quality and delivery accuracy (gamma pass-rate).
统计不确定度对摩纳哥蒙特卡罗剂量计算的影响
目的:评价统计不确定性对摩纳哥5.11治疗计划系统(TPS)蒙特卡罗剂量计算的影响。方法:从TG119报告提供的AAPM网站下载具有轮廓c形结构集的幻体。VMAT计划是为C-Shape测试用例创建的,使用摩纳哥TPS用于6 MV Elekta Versa-HD线性加速器。剂量处方及限制按TG119执行。优化后的c形方案计算具有不同的统计不确定性(i)每个控制点0.5%、1.0%、3.0%和5.0%,(ii)每次计算0.5%、1.0%、3.0%和5.0%。基准计划按每个控制点0.5%计算。结果:在每个控制点0.5%的统计不确定度下,PTV剂量的变化在PTV- d95: 82 cGy(1.64%)范围内;PTV-D10: 14.8 cGy(0.28%);Core-D10: 3.7 cGy(0.15%)。在不同的统计不确定性下,对交付计划所需的MU (920 MU)进行了相同的观察。计算时间随着统计不确定性的减少而增加,这是由于历史次数的增加。2D-Gamma通过率从98.1%到98.9%不等。每个控制点的统计不确定度为0.5%时,Gamma通过率为98.9%。结论:不同统计不确定度的剂量体积参数变化较小(<1.64%),监测单位不变。每个控制点3.0%和每次计算0.5%的结果几乎相似,并且在计划质量和交付准确性(gamma通过率)方面,在合理的计算时间内找到了最优。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信