The US Refugee Resettlement Program — A Return to First Principles: How Refugees Help to Define, Strengthen, and Revitalize the United States

Donald M. Kerwin
{"title":"The US Refugee Resettlement Program — A Return to First Principles: How Refugees Help to Define, Strengthen, and Revitalize the United States","authors":"Donald M. Kerwin","doi":"10.1177/2331502418787787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The US refugee resettlement program should be a source of immense national pride. The program has saved countless lives; put millions of impoverished persons on a path to work, self-sufficiency, and integration; and advanced US standing in the world. Its beneficiaries have included US leaders in science, medicine, business, the law, government, education, and the arts, as well as countless others who have strengthened the nation’s social fabric through their work, family, faith, and community commitments. Refugees embody the ideals of freedom, endurance, and self-sacrifice, and their presence closes the gap between US ideals and its practices. For these reasons, the US Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP) has enjoyed strong, bipartisan support for nearly 40 years. Yet the current administration has taken aim at this program as part of a broader attack on legal immigration programs. It has treated refugees as a burden and a potential threat to our nation, rather than as a source of strength, renewal, and inspiration. In September 2017, it set an extremely low refugee admissions ceiling (45,000) for 2018, which it had no intention of meeting: the United States is on pace to resettle fewer than half of that number. It has also tightened special clearance procedures for refugees from mostly Muslim-majority states so that virtually none can enter; cynically slow-walked the interview, screening, and admissions processes; and decimated the community-based resettlement infrastructure built up throughout many decades (Miliband 2018). At a time of record levels of forced displacement in the world, the United States should model solidarity with refugees and exercise leadership in global refugee protection efforts (Francis 2018a, 102). Instead, the administration has put the United States on pace to resettle the lowest number of refugees in USRAP’s 38year history, with possible further cuts in fiscal year (FY) 2019. This article describes the myriad ways in which this program serves US interests and values. The program:","PeriodicalId":90638,"journal":{"name":"Journal on migration and human security","volume":"15 1","pages":"205 - 225"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"43","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal on migration and human security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2331502418787787","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 43

Abstract

The US refugee resettlement program should be a source of immense national pride. The program has saved countless lives; put millions of impoverished persons on a path to work, self-sufficiency, and integration; and advanced US standing in the world. Its beneficiaries have included US leaders in science, medicine, business, the law, government, education, and the arts, as well as countless others who have strengthened the nation’s social fabric through their work, family, faith, and community commitments. Refugees embody the ideals of freedom, endurance, and self-sacrifice, and their presence closes the gap between US ideals and its practices. For these reasons, the US Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP) has enjoyed strong, bipartisan support for nearly 40 years. Yet the current administration has taken aim at this program as part of a broader attack on legal immigration programs. It has treated refugees as a burden and a potential threat to our nation, rather than as a source of strength, renewal, and inspiration. In September 2017, it set an extremely low refugee admissions ceiling (45,000) for 2018, which it had no intention of meeting: the United States is on pace to resettle fewer than half of that number. It has also tightened special clearance procedures for refugees from mostly Muslim-majority states so that virtually none can enter; cynically slow-walked the interview, screening, and admissions processes; and decimated the community-based resettlement infrastructure built up throughout many decades (Miliband 2018). At a time of record levels of forced displacement in the world, the United States should model solidarity with refugees and exercise leadership in global refugee protection efforts (Francis 2018a, 102). Instead, the administration has put the United States on pace to resettle the lowest number of refugees in USRAP’s 38year history, with possible further cuts in fiscal year (FY) 2019. This article describes the myriad ways in which this program serves US interests and values. The program:
美国难民重新安置计划-回归第一原则:难民如何帮助定义、加强和振兴美国
美国的难民安置计划应该成为巨大的民族自豪感的源泉。该计划挽救了无数人的生命;让数百万贫困人口走上工作、自给自足和融入社会的道路;提高美国在世界上的地位。它的受益者包括美国科学、医学、商业、法律、政府、教育和艺术领域的领导人,以及无数通过工作、家庭、信仰和社区承诺加强国家社会结构的人。难民体现了自由、忍耐和自我牺牲的理想,他们的存在缩小了美国理想与实践之间的差距。由于这些原因,近40年来,美国难民入学计划(USRAP)得到了两党的大力支持。然而,本届政府已经把这个项目作为对合法移民项目进行更广泛攻击的一部分。它把难民视为负担和对我们国家的潜在威胁,而不是力量、复兴和鼓舞的源泉。2017年9月,它为2018年设定了极低的难民接收上限(45,000人),它不打算达到这个上限:美国正在重新安置的人数不到这个数字的一半。它还收紧了对来自穆斯林占多数的国家的难民的特殊通关程序,因此实际上没有人能进入;面试、筛选和录取过程缓慢得令人生厌;摧毁了几十年来建立起来的以社区为基础的重新安置基础设施(Miliband 2018)。在世界上被迫流离失所的人数达到创纪录水平之际,美国应该与难民团结一致,并在全球难民保护工作中发挥领导作用(Francis 2018a, 102)。相反,特朗普政府已经让美国重新安置的难民人数达到了USRAP 38年历史上最低的水平,并可能在2019财年进一步削减。本文描述了这个项目为美国利益和价值观服务的无数方式。程序:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信