Clinical characteristics and outcomes of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation used in a non-cardiac surgical intensive care unit: Siriraj experiences and literature review

Annop Piriyapatsom, S. Kongsayreepong, O. Chaiwat
{"title":"Clinical characteristics and outcomes of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation used in a non-cardiac surgical intensive care unit: Siriraj experiences and literature review","authors":"Annop Piriyapatsom, S. Kongsayreepong, O. Chaiwat","doi":"10.54205/ccc.v31.259819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has substantially increased in frequency of use over the past decades. Occasionally, patients who require ECMO support are admitted to an ICU rather than medical or cardiac ICU, where physicians may be not familiar with the process of how to care for ECMO patients. The aims of this case series were to explore the utilization of ECMO support in a non-cardiac general surgical ICU (SICU) in terms of indications, ECMO-related complications and clinical outcomes. \n\nMethods: Adult patients admitted to the SICU from January 2014 to June 2021 who received ECMO support were included. Demographic data, data regarding ECMO utilization and clinical outcomes were described. Current evidence and updated literature were also researched and reviewed. \n\nResults: A total of 18 patients were admitted to the SICU and received ECMO support, but four died within four hours of SICU admission. The most common reason for ECMO support was extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) (9 cases, 50.0%), followed by cardiac and/or respiratory support. The majority of patients received venoarterial ECMO support (15 cases, 83.3%). Unfractionated heparin was used in 10 cases (71.4%) and the anticoagulant effect was monitored with aPTT, which was maintained at a lower range (30–50 seconds). There was no thromboembolic event, and four patients (28.6%) developed major bleeding. The overall hospital mortality was as high as 77.8%. \n\nConclusion: There was a small volume of cases receiving ECMO support in the SICU. ECPR was the most common reason for ECMO support in these patients. Overall, the hospital mortality was 77.8%. To improve outcomes in these patients, appropriate patient selection, well-organized protocols, and a multidisciplinary approach are mandatory.","PeriodicalId":76963,"journal":{"name":"AACN clinical issues in critical care nursing","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AACN clinical issues in critical care nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54205/ccc.v31.259819","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has substantially increased in frequency of use over the past decades. Occasionally, patients who require ECMO support are admitted to an ICU rather than medical or cardiac ICU, where physicians may be not familiar with the process of how to care for ECMO patients. The aims of this case series were to explore the utilization of ECMO support in a non-cardiac general surgical ICU (SICU) in terms of indications, ECMO-related complications and clinical outcomes. Methods: Adult patients admitted to the SICU from January 2014 to June 2021 who received ECMO support were included. Demographic data, data regarding ECMO utilization and clinical outcomes were described. Current evidence and updated literature were also researched and reviewed. Results: A total of 18 patients were admitted to the SICU and received ECMO support, but four died within four hours of SICU admission. The most common reason for ECMO support was extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) (9 cases, 50.0%), followed by cardiac and/or respiratory support. The majority of patients received venoarterial ECMO support (15 cases, 83.3%). Unfractionated heparin was used in 10 cases (71.4%) and the anticoagulant effect was monitored with aPTT, which was maintained at a lower range (30–50 seconds). There was no thromboembolic event, and four patients (28.6%) developed major bleeding. The overall hospital mortality was as high as 77.8%. Conclusion: There was a small volume of cases receiving ECMO support in the SICU. ECPR was the most common reason for ECMO support in these patients. Overall, the hospital mortality was 77.8%. To improve outcomes in these patients, appropriate patient selection, well-organized protocols, and a multidisciplinary approach are mandatory.
体外膜氧合用于非心脏外科重症监护病房的临床特点和结果:Siriraj经验和文献综述
背景:在过去的几十年里,体外膜氧合(ECMO)的使用频率大大增加。偶尔,需要ECMO支持的患者被送入ICU而不是内科或心脏ICU,那里的医生可能不熟悉如何护理ECMO患者的过程。本病例系列的目的是探讨ECMO支持在非心脏普通外科ICU (SICU)的适应症、ECMO相关并发症和临床结果方面的应用。方法:纳入2014年1月至2021年6月在SICU接受ECMO支持的成年患者。描述了人口统计数据、ECMO使用数据和临床结果。研究和回顾了现有的证据和最新的文献。结果:共有18例患者入住SICU并接受ECMO支持,其中4例患者在入院后4小时内死亡。ECMO支持最常见的原因是体外心肺复苏(ECPR)(9例,50.0%),其次是心脏和/或呼吸支持。大多数患者接受静脉动脉ECMO支持(15例,83.3%)。10例(71.4%)患者使用未分级肝素,采用aPTT监测抗凝效果,aPTT维持在较低范围(30-50秒)。无血栓栓塞事件,4例(28.6%)发生大出血。住院总死亡率高达77.8%。结论:SICU接受ECMO支持的病例较少。ECPR是这些患者进行ECMO支持的最常见原因。总体而言,住院死亡率为77.8%。为了改善这些患者的预后,适当的患者选择,组织良好的方案和多学科的方法是强制性的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信