A Comprehensive Review of Regulatory Requirements and Registration Process of Pharmaceutical Drug Products in CIS Countries

Kapil Pihwal, Neelam Pawar, Sheikh Aamir, M. S. Alam, Vikas Rathee
{"title":"A Comprehensive Review of Regulatory Requirements and Registration Process of Pharmaceutical Drug Products in CIS Countries","authors":"Kapil Pihwal, Neelam Pawar, Sheikh Aamir, M. S. Alam, Vikas Rathee","doi":"10.2174/2213476x07666200708105237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nThe CIS region has a potential market for India. The registration of the\ndrug products in CIS regions is a challenging task because these countries have no harmonized\nregulatory organization. The CIS region includes 12 countries such as Russia, Kyrgyzstan,\nUkraine, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia\nand Moldova, which require different regulatory guidelines for medicinal product registration\nas per their FDA guidelines. The different guidelines for the same region become a challenging\ntask for the manufacturer and exporter. The registration of the same product for different countries\nof CIS is not possible with the same dossier due to the lack of their regulatory harmonization.\nThese countries obey their country-specific dossier format, so to target these market manufacturers\nand exporters needs to submit different dossier documents for different countries. But Ukraine\nand Kazakhstan have harmonization and it varies in Uzbekistan and Tajikistan. Ukraine and Kazakhstan\nare also imposing strict rules and expecting USFDA level documents for approval.\n\n\n\nThe overall conclusion is that harmonization in CIS is highly imbalanced, which affects\nboth time and cost for product registration. Harmonization is the need of the era for easy\nproduct registration, and it will be beneficial for the manufacturer, regulator, importer, exporter,\nand to access medicines of high public health value.\n","PeriodicalId":8525,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Research, Clinical Trials and Regulatory Affairs","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Research, Clinical Trials and Regulatory Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/2213476x07666200708105237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The CIS region has a potential market for India. The registration of the drug products in CIS regions is a challenging task because these countries have no harmonized regulatory organization. The CIS region includes 12 countries such as Russia, Kyrgyzstan, Ukraine, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia and Moldova, which require different regulatory guidelines for medicinal product registration as per their FDA guidelines. The different guidelines for the same region become a challenging task for the manufacturer and exporter. The registration of the same product for different countries of CIS is not possible with the same dossier due to the lack of their regulatory harmonization. These countries obey their country-specific dossier format, so to target these market manufacturers and exporters needs to submit different dossier documents for different countries. But Ukraine and Kazakhstan have harmonization and it varies in Uzbekistan and Tajikistan. Ukraine and Kazakhstan are also imposing strict rules and expecting USFDA level documents for approval. The overall conclusion is that harmonization in CIS is highly imbalanced, which affects both time and cost for product registration. Harmonization is the need of the era for easy product registration, and it will be beneficial for the manufacturer, regulator, importer, exporter, and to access medicines of high public health value.
对独联体国家药品监管要求和注册过程的全面审查
独联体地区对印度有潜在的市场。在独联体地区注册药品是一项具有挑战性的任务,因为这些国家没有统一的监管组织。独联体地区包括俄罗斯、吉尔吉斯斯坦、乌克兰、乌兹别克斯坦、哈萨克斯坦、塔吉克斯坦、土库曼斯坦、亚美尼亚、阿塞拜疆、白俄罗斯、格鲁吉亚和摩尔多瓦等12个国家,根据其FDA指南,这些国家对药品注册需要不同的监管指南。对于制造商和出口商来说,同一地区的不同指导方针成为一项具有挑战性的任务。由于缺乏监管协调,同一产品在独联体不同国家的注册是不可能的。这些国家遵守其国家特定的档案格式,因此为了针对这些市场,制造商和出口商需要为不同的国家提交不同的档案文件。但乌克兰和哈萨克斯坦是和谐的,乌兹别克斯坦和塔吉克斯坦则有所不同。乌克兰和哈萨克斯坦也实施了严格的规定,并期待获得美国食品药品监督管理局(fda)级别的文件批准。总体结论是,CIS的协调是高度不平衡的,这影响了产品注册的时间和成本。统一是易于产品注册的时代的需要,它将有利于制造商、监管机构、进口商、出口商以及获得具有高公共卫生价值的药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信