Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation with Two Different Inorganic Bovine Bone Grafts: an Experimental Study in Rabbits.

Vitor Ferreira Balan, D. Botticelli, D. Peñarrocha-Oltra, K. Masuda, Eduardo Pires Godoy, S. Xavier
{"title":"Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation with Two Different Inorganic Bovine Bone Grafts: an Experimental Study in Rabbits.","authors":"Vitor Ferreira Balan, D. Botticelli, D. Peñarrocha-Oltra, K. Masuda, Eduardo Pires Godoy, S. Xavier","doi":"10.3290/j.cjdr.b3086337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nTo compare the sequential healing of maxillary sinuses grafted with two different xenogeneic bone substitutes processed at either a low (300°C) or high (1200°C) temperature.\n\n\nMETHODS\nA sinus augmentation procedure was performed bilaterally in 20 rabbits and two different xenogeneic bone grafts were randomly used to fill the elevated spaces. Healing was studied after 2 and 10 weeks, in 10 rabbits during each period.\n\n\nRESULTS\nAfter 2 weeks of healing, very small amounts of new bone were observed in both groups, and were mainly confined to close to the sinus bone walls and osteotomy edges. After 10 weeks of healing, new bone was found in all regions, with higher percentages in those close to the bone walls and to the osteotomy. In this period of healing, the proportion of new bone in the 300°C group was 20.0% ± 4.3%, and in the 1200°C group it was 17.2% ± 4.3% (P = 0.162). In the 1200°C group, translucent, dark fog-like shadows in regions of the grafts were hiding portions of new bone (interpenetrating bone network).\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nBoth biomaterials provided conditions that allowed bone growth within the elevated space, confirming that both biomaterials are suitable to be used as a graft for sinus floor augmentation.","PeriodicalId":22405,"journal":{"name":"The Chinese journal of dental research : the official journal of the Scientific Section of the Chinese Stomatological Association","volume":"18 1","pages":"93-105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Chinese journal of dental research : the official journal of the Scientific Section of the Chinese Stomatological Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.cjdr.b3086337","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To compare the sequential healing of maxillary sinuses grafted with two different xenogeneic bone substitutes processed at either a low (300°C) or high (1200°C) temperature. METHODS A sinus augmentation procedure was performed bilaterally in 20 rabbits and two different xenogeneic bone grafts were randomly used to fill the elevated spaces. Healing was studied after 2 and 10 weeks, in 10 rabbits during each period. RESULTS After 2 weeks of healing, very small amounts of new bone were observed in both groups, and were mainly confined to close to the sinus bone walls and osteotomy edges. After 10 weeks of healing, new bone was found in all regions, with higher percentages in those close to the bone walls and to the osteotomy. In this period of healing, the proportion of new bone in the 300°C group was 20.0% ± 4.3%, and in the 1200°C group it was 17.2% ± 4.3% (P = 0.162). In the 1200°C group, translucent, dark fog-like shadows in regions of the grafts were hiding portions of new bone (interpenetrating bone network). CONCLUSION Both biomaterials provided conditions that allowed bone growth within the elevated space, confirming that both biomaterials are suitable to be used as a graft for sinus floor augmentation.
两种不同的无机牛骨移植物在兔上颌窦底增强的实验研究。
目的比较两种不同的异种骨替代物在低(300℃)和高(1200℃)温度下移植上颌窦的顺序愈合。方法对20只家兔进行双侧鼻窦增强术,随机选择两种不同的异种骨移植物填充抬高的间隙。在2周和10周后分别观察10只家兔的愈合情况。结果两组患者愈合2周后均有少量新生骨出现,新生骨主要局限于靠近窦骨壁及截骨边缘。愈合10周后,所有区域都发现了新骨,靠近骨壁和截骨处的百分比更高。300°C组新生骨比例为20.0%±4.3%,1200°C组为17.2%±4.3% (P = 0.162)。在1200°C组,移植物区域的半透明,黑暗雾状阴影隐藏了部分新骨(互穿骨网络)。结论两种生物材料均提供了骨在抬高空间内生长的条件,证实了两种生物材料均适合作为窦底增强的移植物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信