Strategi Ketidaksantunan Berbahasa dalam Wacana Keagamaan

Hanifullah Syukri, Henry Yustanto, F. X. Sawardi, Miftah Nugroho, C. S. Widyastuti, H. Widyastuti, Bakdal Ginanjar
{"title":"Strategi Ketidaksantunan Berbahasa dalam Wacana Keagamaan","authors":"Hanifullah Syukri, Henry Yustanto, F. X. Sawardi, Miftah Nugroho, C. S. Widyastuti, H. Widyastuti, Bakdal Ginanjar","doi":"10.47028/j.risenologi.2022.71.263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to describe the types of language impoliteness strategies in the discourse of religious texts, especially Islam. A pragmatic approach is used in this study. The data of this research are in the form of words, phrases, clauses, or sentences that contain impoliteness. The research data sources come from three discourses of Islamic religious texts taken from Youtube in 2020. The data collection method used is the download method. The research data were analyzed using contextual analysis methods. The results showed that there were four types of language impoliteness strategies found in three religious text discourses, namely (i) direct impoliteness strategies, (ii) positive impoliteness strategies, (iii) negative impoliteness strategies, and (iv) pseudo politeness strategies or sarcasm. The type of impoliteness strategy that is most commonly found in the discourse of religious speech texts is a negative impoliteness strategy with the most widely applied sub strategi is degrading sub strategi. The pseudo-politeness strategy or sarcasm is the least used strategy. The imbalance of power or social power between speech participants is the dominant factor in influencing the emergence of language impoliteness in the discourse of religious texts.","PeriodicalId":34646,"journal":{"name":"Risenologi","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risenologi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47028/j.risenologi.2022.71.263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to describe the types of language impoliteness strategies in the discourse of religious texts, especially Islam. A pragmatic approach is used in this study. The data of this research are in the form of words, phrases, clauses, or sentences that contain impoliteness. The research data sources come from three discourses of Islamic religious texts taken from Youtube in 2020. The data collection method used is the download method. The research data were analyzed using contextual analysis methods. The results showed that there were four types of language impoliteness strategies found in three religious text discourses, namely (i) direct impoliteness strategies, (ii) positive impoliteness strategies, (iii) negative impoliteness strategies, and (iv) pseudo politeness strategies or sarcasm. The type of impoliteness strategy that is most commonly found in the discourse of religious speech texts is a negative impoliteness strategy with the most widely applied sub strategi is degrading sub strategi. The pseudo-politeness strategy or sarcasm is the least used strategy. The imbalance of power or social power between speech participants is the dominant factor in influencing the emergence of language impoliteness in the discourse of religious texts.
宗教教义中不礼貌的策略
本研究旨在描述宗教文本,特别是伊斯兰教话语中语言不礼貌策略的类型。本研究采用了实用主义方法。本研究的数据以包含不礼貌的单词、短语、从句或句子的形式出现。研究数据来源来自2020年Youtube上的三个伊斯兰宗教文本的论述。数据收集方式为下载方式。采用上下文分析法对研究数据进行分析。结果表明,在三种宗教文本话语中存在四种语言不礼貌策略,即(i)直接不礼貌策略,(ii)积极不礼貌策略,(iii)消极不礼貌策略和(iv)伪礼貌策略或讽刺。宗教演讲文本话语中最常见的不礼貌策略类型是消极不礼貌策略,其中应用最广泛的子策略是贬低子策略。伪礼貌策略或讽刺是使用最少的策略。话语参与者之间的权力或社会权力的不平衡是影响宗教文本话语中语言不礼貌出现的主要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书