Chronic atrophic gastritis as a precancer: the evolution of ideas from the Sydney consensus to Maastricht VI

IF 0.1 Q4 PATHOLOGY
Y. Stepanov, Y. Haidar, O. A. Maltseva
{"title":"Chronic atrophic gastritis as a precancer: the evolution of ideas from the Sydney consensus to Maastricht VI","authors":"Y. Stepanov, Y. Haidar, O. A. Maltseva","doi":"10.14739/2310-1237.2022.3.269011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim. The purpose of the work is the evolution of systems and classifications of gastritis: Sydney Consensus (1990), Houston Modification (1994), OLGA/OLGIM (2008), Kyoto (2014), MAPS II (2019), Maastricht IV (2022).\nMaterials and methods. During the work, 25 sources of information were used.\nResults. Chronic atrophic gastritis (ChAG) is a clinical and morphological diagnosis, and the presented clinical forms (types) of gastritis have characteristic morphological criteria. According to the Sydney system, changes in the antrum and body of the stomach are described separately. This has led to a lack of clear risk stratification criteria for CG and also complicates the objective analysis of regression of inflammation and atrophy. OLGA/OLGIM systems were proposed to determine the stage of atrophy and IM. The authors of the Kyoto consensus add and clarify the etiological section of ChAG. In MAPS II, ChAG and IM are considered precancerous conditions, as they increase the risk of developing gastric cancer and are the background for the occurrence of dysplasia and adenocarcinoma. For patients with dysplasia and the absence of visible changes in the mucous membrane, high-resolution endoscopy with staining is recommended. They should be examined after 6 months for a high degree of dysplasia and after 12 months for a low degree of dysplasia. Patients with IM and one localization have a high risk of developing gastric cancer. However, the high risk does not give the right to follow up in the majority of cases when high-quality endoscopy with biopsy does not show severe atrophy. Patients with IM of one location, with a family history of cancer, or with incomplete IM and persistence of H. pylori chromo endoscopy with biopsy must be done once every 3 years. Patients with extended fields of atrophic aggression (pronounced atrophic changes) or IM in the antrum and body, OLGA/OLGIM III/IV should be screened with chromoendoscopy with biopsy every 3 years. Patients with significant atrophy and familial cancer benefit from chromoendoscopy and biopsy every 1–2 years after initial diagnosis. Patients with autoimmune gastritis are recommended to be screened every 3–5 years. According to Maastricht VI, H. pylori is the main etiological factor of gastric adenocarcinoma, including proximal gastric cancer.\nConclusions. After careful study and analysis, we came to the conclusion about the gradual development of the principles of evidence-based medicine in the issue of improving the clinical and morphological diagnosis of chronic atrophic gastritis as a precancerous of the stomach.\n ","PeriodicalId":41645,"journal":{"name":"Pathologia","volume":"105 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14739/2310-1237.2022.3.269011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim. The purpose of the work is the evolution of systems and classifications of gastritis: Sydney Consensus (1990), Houston Modification (1994), OLGA/OLGIM (2008), Kyoto (2014), MAPS II (2019), Maastricht IV (2022). Materials and methods. During the work, 25 sources of information were used. Results. Chronic atrophic gastritis (ChAG) is a clinical and morphological diagnosis, and the presented clinical forms (types) of gastritis have characteristic morphological criteria. According to the Sydney system, changes in the antrum and body of the stomach are described separately. This has led to a lack of clear risk stratification criteria for CG and also complicates the objective analysis of regression of inflammation and atrophy. OLGA/OLGIM systems were proposed to determine the stage of atrophy and IM. The authors of the Kyoto consensus add and clarify the etiological section of ChAG. In MAPS II, ChAG and IM are considered precancerous conditions, as they increase the risk of developing gastric cancer and are the background for the occurrence of dysplasia and adenocarcinoma. For patients with dysplasia and the absence of visible changes in the mucous membrane, high-resolution endoscopy with staining is recommended. They should be examined after 6 months for a high degree of dysplasia and after 12 months for a low degree of dysplasia. Patients with IM and one localization have a high risk of developing gastric cancer. However, the high risk does not give the right to follow up in the majority of cases when high-quality endoscopy with biopsy does not show severe atrophy. Patients with IM of one location, with a family history of cancer, or with incomplete IM and persistence of H. pylori chromo endoscopy with biopsy must be done once every 3 years. Patients with extended fields of atrophic aggression (pronounced atrophic changes) or IM in the antrum and body, OLGA/OLGIM III/IV should be screened with chromoendoscopy with biopsy every 3 years. Patients with significant atrophy and familial cancer benefit from chromoendoscopy and biopsy every 1–2 years after initial diagnosis. Patients with autoimmune gastritis are recommended to be screened every 3–5 years. According to Maastricht VI, H. pylori is the main etiological factor of gastric adenocarcinoma, including proximal gastric cancer. Conclusions. After careful study and analysis, we came to the conclusion about the gradual development of the principles of evidence-based medicine in the issue of improving the clinical and morphological diagnosis of chronic atrophic gastritis as a precancerous of the stomach.  
慢性萎缩性胃炎作为癌前病变:从悉尼共识到马斯特里赫特六世的思想演变
的目标。这项工作的目的是胃炎系统和分类的演变:悉尼共识(1990),休斯顿修订(1994),OLGA/OLGIM(2008),京都(2014),MAPS II(2019),马斯特里赫特IV(2022)。材料和方法。在工作中,使用了25个信息来源。慢性萎缩性胃炎(ChAG)是一种临床和形态学诊断,胃炎的临床表现(类型)有其特有的形态学标准。根据悉尼系统,胃窦和胃体的变化是分开描述的。这导致CG缺乏明确的风险分层标准,也使炎症和萎缩消退的客观分析变得复杂。提出了OLGA/OLGIM系统来确定萎缩阶段和IM。京都共识的作者增加并澄清了ChAG的病因部分。在MAPS II中,ChAG和IM被认为是癌前病变,因为它们增加了发生胃癌的风险,是不典型增生和腺癌发生的背景。对于不典型增生且粘膜未见明显变化的患者,建议采用高分辨率染色内镜检查。他们应该在6个月后检查高度发育不良,12个月后检查低程度发育不良。IM和一个定位的患者发生胃癌的风险很高。然而,当高质量的内镜活检没有显示严重萎缩时,大多数病例的高风险并没有给予随访的权利。单一部位的内窥镜患者、有癌症家族史的患者、不完全内窥镜患者和幽门螺杆菌染色内窥镜活检患者必须每3年做一次检查。萎缩侵袭范围扩大(明显的萎缩改变)或胃窦和体内IM, OLGA/OLGIM III/IV型患者应每3年进行一次染色内镜检查和活检。有明显萎缩和家族性癌症的患者在初次诊断后每1-2年进行一次染色内镜检查和活检。自身免疫性胃炎患者建议每3-5年筛查一次。根据Maastricht VI,幽门螺旋杆菌是胃腺癌包括近端胃癌的主要病因。经过仔细的研究和分析,我们得出结论,在提高慢性萎缩性胃炎作为胃癌前病变的临床和形态学诊断问题上,循证医学原则正在逐步发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pathologia
Pathologia PATHOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书